Gaps in Patient Education on Safe Handling and Disposal of Oral Chemotherapy Drugs: A Pilot Prospective Cohort Survey Study.

Sun Yang, Priya Patel, Alexandra Corcoran, Eric Dobberpuhl, Samantha Isidro, Dustin Le, Analise Klassen, Jay Rho, David Tran, Richard Beuttler, Neda Noori Nassr, Katherine Gruenberg, Siu-Fun Wong
{"title":"Gaps in Patient Education on Safe Handling and Disposal of Oral Chemotherapy Drugs: A Pilot Prospective Cohort Survey Study.","authors":"Sun Yang, Priya Patel, Alexandra Corcoran, Eric Dobberpuhl, Samantha Isidro, Dustin Le, Analise Klassen, Jay Rho, David Tran, Richard Beuttler, Neda Noori Nassr, Katherine Gruenberg, Siu-Fun Wong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral anticancer chemotherapy (OC) has been misperceived as being safer than intravenous chemotherapy, leading to its increased risk of improper handling and disposal. This survey study assessed the knowledge, practices and attitudes of pharmacists and patients regarding OC handling and disposal, gaps in knowledge and barriers to patient education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were developed based on literature review and pilot study validation results. Patients completed a 33-item paper or electronic survey whereas pharmacists completed a 38-item electronic survey. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test computed using the R Project were used for analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmacist group (16/25, 62.5%) and patient group (14/29, 48.3%) believed that the oral route is safer than IV. Average overall correct response rates for pharmacist and patient groups were 78.3% and 61.9%, respectively. Significant gaps in knowledge between groups were observed in three sections (p < 0.05). Common barriers to providing patient education were insufficient training (70.8%) and insufficient time (50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacist and patient knowledge, awareness and practices of OC safe handling and disposal are suboptimal. Areas of knowledge gaps and barriers to patient education were identified. Enhanced supports are needed to empower pharmacists to assume an active role in patient education on safe handling and disposal of OC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice","volume":"70 2","pages":"23-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral anticancer chemotherapy (OC) has been misperceived as being safer than intravenous chemotherapy, leading to its increased risk of improper handling and disposal. This survey study assessed the knowledge, practices and attitudes of pharmacists and patients regarding OC handling and disposal, gaps in knowledge and barriers to patient education.

Methods: Surveys were developed based on literature review and pilot study validation results. Patients completed a 33-item paper or electronic survey whereas pharmacists completed a 38-item electronic survey. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test computed using the R Project were used for analyses.

Results: Pharmacist group (16/25, 62.5%) and patient group (14/29, 48.3%) believed that the oral route is safer than IV. Average overall correct response rates for pharmacist and patient groups were 78.3% and 61.9%, respectively. Significant gaps in knowledge between groups were observed in three sections (p < 0.05). Common barriers to providing patient education were insufficient training (70.8%) and insufficient time (50%).

Conclusion: Pharmacist and patient knowledge, awareness and practices of OC safe handling and disposal are suboptimal. Areas of knowledge gaps and barriers to patient education were identified. Enhanced supports are needed to empower pharmacists to assume an active role in patient education on safe handling and disposal of OC.

关于口服化疗药物安全处理和处置的患者教育差距:一项前瞻性队列调查研究。
背景:口服抗癌化疗(OC)被误认为比静脉化疗更安全,导致其处理和处置不当的风险增加。这项调查研究评估了药剂师和患者对OC处理和处置的知识、实践和态度、知识差距和患者教育障碍。方法:根据文献综述和中试研究验证结果进行调查。患者完成了33项纸质或电子调查,而药剂师完成了38项电子调查。使用描述性统计和使用R项目计算的Fisher精确检验进行分析。结果:药剂师组(16/25,62.5%)和患者组(14/29,48.3%)认为口服途径比IV更安全。药剂师组和患者组的平均总体正确反应率分别为78.3%和61.9%。在三个部分中,观察到各组之间的知识存在显著差距(p<0.05)。提供患者教育的常见障碍是培训不足(70.8%)和时间不足(50%)。结论:药剂师和患者对OC安全处理和处置的知识、意识和实践是次优的。确定了知识差距和患者教育障碍的领域。需要加强支持,使药剂师能够在患者安全处理和处置OC的教育中发挥积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信