Cleaved caspase-3 is present in the majority of glial cells in the intact rat spinal cord during postnatal life.

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Histochemistry and Cell Biology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s00418-023-02249-7
R Holota, V Dečmanová, A Alexovič Matiašová, J Košuth, L Slovinská, L Pačut, Z Tomori, Z Daxnerová, J Ševc
{"title":"Cleaved caspase-3 is present in the majority of glial cells in the intact rat spinal cord during postnatal life.","authors":"R Holota, V Dečmanová, A Alexovič Matiašová, J Košuth, L Slovinská, L Pačut, Z Tomori, Z Daxnerová, J Ševc","doi":"10.1007/s00418-023-02249-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cell death is an essential process that occurs during the development of the central nervous system. Despite the availability of a wide range of commercially produced antibodies against various apoptotic markers, data regarding apoptosis in intact spinal cord during postnatal development and adulthood are mostly missing. We investigated apoptosis in rat spinal cord at different stages of ontogenesis (postnatal days 8, 29, and 90). For this purpose, we applied immunofluorescent detection of two widely used apoptotic markers, cleaved caspase-3 (cC3) and cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (cPARP). Surprisingly, we found significant discrepancy between the number of cC3<sup>+</sup> cells and PARP<sup>+</sup> cells, with a ratio between 500:1 and 5000:1 in rat spinal cord at all postnatal time points. The majority of cC3<sup>+</sup> cells were glial cells and did not exhibit an apoptotic phenotype. In contrast with in vivo results, in vitro analysis of primary cell cultures derived from neonatal rat spinal cord and treated with the apoptotic inductor staurosporine revealed a similar onset of occurrence of both cC3 and cPARP in cells subjected to apoptosis. Gene expression analysis of spinal cord revealed elevated expression of the Birc4 (XIAP), Birc2, and Birc5 (Survivin) genes, which are known potent inhibitors of apoptosis. Our data indicate that cC3 is not an exclusive marker of apoptosis, especially in glial cells, owing its possible presence in inhibited forms and/or its participation in other non-apoptotic roles. Therefore, cPARP appears to be a more appropriate marker to detect apoptosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13107,"journal":{"name":"Histochemistry and Cell Biology","volume":" ","pages":"269-286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histochemistry and Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-023-02249-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cell death is an essential process that occurs during the development of the central nervous system. Despite the availability of a wide range of commercially produced antibodies against various apoptotic markers, data regarding apoptosis in intact spinal cord during postnatal development and adulthood are mostly missing. We investigated apoptosis in rat spinal cord at different stages of ontogenesis (postnatal days 8, 29, and 90). For this purpose, we applied immunofluorescent detection of two widely used apoptotic markers, cleaved caspase-3 (cC3) and cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (cPARP). Surprisingly, we found significant discrepancy between the number of cC3+ cells and PARP+ cells, with a ratio between 500:1 and 5000:1 in rat spinal cord at all postnatal time points. The majority of cC3+ cells were glial cells and did not exhibit an apoptotic phenotype. In contrast with in vivo results, in vitro analysis of primary cell cultures derived from neonatal rat spinal cord and treated with the apoptotic inductor staurosporine revealed a similar onset of occurrence of both cC3 and cPARP in cells subjected to apoptosis. Gene expression analysis of spinal cord revealed elevated expression of the Birc4 (XIAP), Birc2, and Birc5 (Survivin) genes, which are known potent inhibitors of apoptosis. Our data indicate that cC3 is not an exclusive marker of apoptosis, especially in glial cells, owing its possible presence in inhibited forms and/or its participation in other non-apoptotic roles. Therefore, cPARP appears to be a more appropriate marker to detect apoptosis.

Abstract Image

在出生后的生活中,裂解的胱天蛋白酶-3存在于完整大鼠脊髓中的大多数神经胶质细胞中。
细胞死亡是中枢神经系统发育过程中发生的一个重要过程。尽管可以获得广泛的商业生产的抗各种凋亡标志物的抗体,但关于出生后发育和成年期间完整脊髓中细胞凋亡的数据大多缺失。我们研究了大鼠脊髓在个体发生的不同阶段(出生后第8、29和90天)的细胞凋亡。为此,我们应用免疫荧光检测两种广泛使用的凋亡标记物,裂解的胱天蛋白酶-3(cC3)和裂解的聚ADP核糖聚合酶(cPARP)。令人惊讶的是,我们发现大鼠脊髓中cC3+细胞和PARP+细胞的数量存在显著差异,在出生后的所有时间点,比例在500:1和5000:1之间。大多数cC3+细胞是神经胶质细胞,并且没有表现出凋亡表型。与体内结果相反,对来源于新生大鼠脊髓并用凋亡诱导剂星形孢菌素处理的原代细胞培养物的体外分析显示,在经历凋亡的细胞中,cC3和cPARP的发生开始相似。脊髓的基因表达分析显示Birc4(XIAP)、Birc2和Birc5(Survivin)基因的表达升高,这是已知的有效的细胞凋亡抑制剂。我们的数据表明,cC3不是凋亡的唯一标志物,尤其是在神经胶质细胞中,因为它可能以抑制的形式存在和/或参与其他非凋亡作用。因此,cPARP似乎是检测细胞凋亡的更合适的标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Histochemistry and Cell Biology
Histochemistry and Cell Biology 生物-细胞生物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
112
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Histochemistry and Cell Biology is devoted to the field of molecular histology and cell biology, publishing original articles dealing with the localization and identification of molecular components, metabolic activities and cell biological aspects of cells and tissues. Coverage extends to the development, application, and/or evaluation of methods and probes that can be used in the entire area of histochemistry and cell biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信