Total knee arthroplasty: do newer CR implants yield better results? A single center prospective study.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
K Kempenaers, N VAN Beek, R Lauwers, M Tengrootenhuysen
{"title":"Total knee arthroplasty: do newer CR implants yield better results? A single center prospective study.","authors":"K Kempenaers, N VAN Beek, R Lauwers, M Tengrootenhuysen","doi":"10.52628/89.3.11325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare whether the newest TKA prosthesis (Persona) gives improved clinical outcomes due its more anatomical design in comparison to older prostheses (balanSys). This study included a total of 89 patients planned for TKA from June 2018 to September 2019. Outcomes such as Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), range of motion (ROM), numeric pain rating scale (NRS), analgesics and alignment were recorded next to patient characteristics and complications. Our results showed a significant improvement in NRS, ROM and functional scores postoperatively compared to preoperatively for both the Persona and the balanSys implants. Although the flexion ROM for the Persona group was higher at 6 and 12 months postoperative compared to the balanSys, this was mainly a regaining of the preoperative ROM. Throughout all timepoints, there were no statistically significant differences observed in NSAID and opioid usage between the balanSys and Persona groups. Both implants are safe and efficient to use in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Although Persona had an improved postoperative flexion, this did not have an impact on any of the patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.3.11325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare whether the newest TKA prosthesis (Persona) gives improved clinical outcomes due its more anatomical design in comparison to older prostheses (balanSys). This study included a total of 89 patients planned for TKA from June 2018 to September 2019. Outcomes such as Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), range of motion (ROM), numeric pain rating scale (NRS), analgesics and alignment were recorded next to patient characteristics and complications. Our results showed a significant improvement in NRS, ROM and functional scores postoperatively compared to preoperatively for both the Persona and the balanSys implants. Although the flexion ROM for the Persona group was higher at 6 and 12 months postoperative compared to the balanSys, this was mainly a regaining of the preoperative ROM. Throughout all timepoints, there were no statistically significant differences observed in NSAID and opioid usage between the balanSys and Persona groups. Both implants are safe and efficient to use in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Although Persona had an improved postoperative flexion, this did not have an impact on any of the patient-reported outcomes.

全膝关节置换术:新的CR植入物能产生更好的效果吗?单中心前瞻性研究。
本研究的目的是比较最新的TKA假体(Persona)与较旧的假体(balanSys)相比,由于其更具解剖设计,是否能改善临床效果。该研究包括计划于2018年6月至2019年9月进行TKA的89名患者。结果,如膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)、活动范围(ROM)、数字疼痛评定量表(NRS)、止痛药和对齐,记录在患者特征和并发症旁边。我们的结果显示,与术前相比,Persona和balanceSys植入物的术后NRS、ROM和功能评分均有显著改善。尽管术后6个月和12个月,Persona组的屈曲ROM高于balanSys组,但这主要是术前ROM的恢复。在所有时间点,balanSys和Persona组在NSAID和阿片类药物使用方面没有观察到统计学上的显著差异。这两种植入物在治疗膝骨关节炎方面都是安全有效的。尽管Persona术后屈曲功能有所改善,但这对任何患者报告的结果都没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信