Forecasting carrot yield with optimal timing of Sentinel 2 image acquisition

IF 5.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
L. A. Suarez, M. Robertson-Dean, J. Brinkhoff, A. Robson
{"title":"Forecasting carrot yield with optimal timing of Sentinel 2 image acquisition","authors":"L. A. Suarez, M. Robertson-Dean, J. Brinkhoff, A. Robson","doi":"10.1007/s11119-023-10083-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate, non-destructive forecasting of carrot yield is difficult due to its subterranean growing habit. Furthermore, the timing of forecasting usually occurs when the crop is mature, limiting the opportunity to implement alternative management decisions to improve yield (during the growing season). This study aims to improve the accuracy of carrot yield forecasting by exploring time series and multivariate approaches. Using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery in three Australian vegetable regions, we established a time series of carrot phenological stages (PhS) from ‘days after sowing’ (DAS) to enhance prediction timing. Numerous vegetation indices (VIs) were analyzed to derive temporal growth patterns. Correlations with yield at different PhS were established. Although the average root yield (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) did not significantly differ across the regions, the temporal VI signatures, indicating different regional crop growth trends, did vary as well as the PhS at when the maximum correlation with yield occurred (<span>\\(PhS_{{R2_{max} }} )\\)</span> with two of the regions producing a delayed <span>\\(PhS_{{R2_{max} }}\\)</span> (i.e. 90–130 DAS). The best multivariate model was identified at 70 DAS, extending the forecasting window before harvest between 20 to 60 days. The performance of this model was validated with new crops producing an average error of 16.9 t ha<sup>−1</sup> (27% of total yield). These results demonstrate the potential of the model at such early stage under varying growing conditions offering growers and stakeholders the chance to optimize farming practices, make informed decisions on selling, harvesting, and labor planning, and adopt precision agriculture methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"63 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-023-10083-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate, non-destructive forecasting of carrot yield is difficult due to its subterranean growing habit. Furthermore, the timing of forecasting usually occurs when the crop is mature, limiting the opportunity to implement alternative management decisions to improve yield (during the growing season). This study aims to improve the accuracy of carrot yield forecasting by exploring time series and multivariate approaches. Using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery in three Australian vegetable regions, we established a time series of carrot phenological stages (PhS) from ‘days after sowing’ (DAS) to enhance prediction timing. Numerous vegetation indices (VIs) were analyzed to derive temporal growth patterns. Correlations with yield at different PhS were established. Although the average root yield (t ha−1) did not significantly differ across the regions, the temporal VI signatures, indicating different regional crop growth trends, did vary as well as the PhS at when the maximum correlation with yield occurred (\(PhS_{{R2_{max} }} )\) with two of the regions producing a delayed \(PhS_{{R2_{max} }}\) (i.e. 90–130 DAS). The best multivariate model was identified at 70 DAS, extending the forecasting window before harvest between 20 to 60 days. The performance of this model was validated with new crops producing an average error of 16.9 t ha−1 (27% of total yield). These results demonstrate the potential of the model at such early stage under varying growing conditions offering growers and stakeholders the chance to optimize farming practices, make informed decisions on selling, harvesting, and labor planning, and adopt precision agriculture methods.

利用Sentinel 2图像采集的最佳时机预测胡萝卜产量
由于胡萝卜的地下生长习惯,很难准确、无损地预测其产量。此外,预测的时间通常发生在作物成熟时,限制了实施替代管理决策以提高产量的机会(在生长季节)。本研究旨在通过探索时间序列和多元方法来提高胡萝卜产量预测的准确性。利用澳大利亚三个蔬菜区的Sentinel-2卫星图像,我们建立了从“播种后几天”(DAS)开始的胡萝卜酚期(PhS)时间序列,以提高预测时间。对大量植被指数(VI)进行了分析,以得出时间生长模式。建立了不同PhS下产量的相关性。尽管各地区的平均根产量(t ha−1)没有显著差异,但表明不同地区作物生长趋势的时间VI特征以及与产量出现最大相关性时的PhS(PhS_{R2_{max}})确实有所不同,其中两个地区产生延迟的\(PhS_{R2_{max}}})(即90–130 DAS)。最佳的多变量模型是在70 DAS时确定的,将收获前的预测窗口延长了20至60天。该模型的性能得到了新作物产量的验证,平均误差为16.9 t ha−1(占总产量的27%)。这些结果证明了该模型在不同生长条件下的早期阶段的潜力,为种植者和利益相关者提供了优化农业实践、在销售、收割和劳动力规划方面做出明智决策以及采用精准农业方法的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming. There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc. Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc. Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc. Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc. Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc. Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信