[Acetabular metastatic defect reconstruction using the modular revision support cup MRS-C].

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1007/s00064-023-00834-6
S Koob, H Kohlhof, T M Randau, D C Wirtz
{"title":"[Acetabular metastatic defect reconstruction using the modular revision support cup MRS-C].","authors":"S Koob, H Kohlhof, T M Randau, D C Wirtz","doi":"10.1007/s00064-023-00834-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stabilization of metastatic acetabular defects with a bone cement-augmented revision support cup for remobilization of oncological patients in advanced cancer stages.</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>Metastatic acetabular defects (Metastatic Acetabular Classification, MAC 2-4) in patients with a prognostic medium or long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Contraindications: </strong>Highly limited survival due to metastatic disease (< 6 weeks). Local bone or soft tissue infection. Primary bone tumor with curative treatment option. Advanced pelvic discontinuity. Recent wound compromising systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Surgical technique: </strong>Standard hip approach. Curettage of the metastatic defect and careful reaming of the acetabulum before insertion of the cup. Predrilling of the dome und flange screws before application of the bone cement through the center hole of the implant and filling of the acetabular defect. Complete insertion of the screws for compound osteosynthesis. Implant of a modular inlay or dual mobility system.</p><p><strong>Postoperative management: </strong>Full weight bearing or mobilization with two crutches according to the level of pain. Adjuvant local radiation therapy after wound consolidation. Continuation of systemic therapy according to tumor board decision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2012 and 2019, we treated 14 patients with metastatic acetabular defects using the modular revision support cup \"MRS-TITAN® Comfort\", MRS-C, Peter Brehm GmbH, Weisendorf, Germany) at our institution. Mean Harris Hip Score improvement was 23.2 with a mean patient's survival of 9.7 months due to the reduced cancer-related prognosis; 13 of the 14 implants endured the patient's prognosis. One implant had to be removed due soft tissue defect-related periprosthetic joint infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":54677,"journal":{"name":"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie","volume":" ","pages":"145-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11014813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-023-00834-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Stabilization of metastatic acetabular defects with a bone cement-augmented revision support cup for remobilization of oncological patients in advanced cancer stages.

Indications: Metastatic acetabular defects (Metastatic Acetabular Classification, MAC 2-4) in patients with a prognostic medium or long-term survival.

Contraindications: Highly limited survival due to metastatic disease (< 6 weeks). Local bone or soft tissue infection. Primary bone tumor with curative treatment option. Advanced pelvic discontinuity. Recent wound compromising systemic therapy.

Surgical technique: Standard hip approach. Curettage of the metastatic defect and careful reaming of the acetabulum before insertion of the cup. Predrilling of the dome und flange screws before application of the bone cement through the center hole of the implant and filling of the acetabular defect. Complete insertion of the screws for compound osteosynthesis. Implant of a modular inlay or dual mobility system.

Postoperative management: Full weight bearing or mobilization with two crutches according to the level of pain. Adjuvant local radiation therapy after wound consolidation. Continuation of systemic therapy according to tumor board decision.

Results: Between 2012 and 2019, we treated 14 patients with metastatic acetabular defects using the modular revision support cup "MRS-TITAN® Comfort", MRS-C, Peter Brehm GmbH, Weisendorf, Germany) at our institution. Mean Harris Hip Score improvement was 23.2 with a mean patient's survival of 9.7 months due to the reduced cancer-related prognosis; 13 of the 14 implants endured the patient's prognosis. One implant had to be removed due soft tissue defect-related periprosthetic joint infection.

[使用模块化翻修支撑杯MRS-C重建髋臼转移性缺损]。
目的:用骨水泥强化翻修支持杯稳定转移性髋臼缺损,使癌症晚期肿瘤患者重新活动。适应症:具有中长期生存预后的患者中的转移性髋臼缺损(转移性髋臼分类,MAC 2-4)。禁忌症:由于转移性疾病,生存率非常有限(手术技术:标准髋关节入路。切除转移性缺损,在插入髋臼杯之前仔细扩孔。在通过植入物的中心孔应用骨水泥并填充髋臼缺损之前,预钻圆顶和凸缘螺钉。完全插入螺钉进行复合骨合成l移动系统。术后处理:根据疼痛程度,用两根拐杖完全负重或活动。伤口巩固后的辅助局部放射治疗。根据肿瘤委员会的决定继续进行全身治疗。结果:2012年至2019年间,我们在我们的机构使用模块化翻修支撑杯“MRS-TITAN®Comfort”,MRS-C,Peter Brehm GmbH,Weisendorf,德国)治疗了14名转移性髋臼缺损患者。平均Harris髋关节评分改善23.2,由于癌症相关预后降低,患者平均存活9.7个月;14个植入物中有13个经受住了患者的预后。一个植入物由于软组织缺损相关的假体周围关节感染而不得不移除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedics and Traumatology is directed toward all orthopedic surgeons, trauma-tologists, hand surgeons, specialists in sports injuries, orthopedics and rheumatology as well as gene-al surgeons who require access to reliable information on current operative methods to ensure the quality of patient advice, preoperative planning, and postoperative care. The journal presents established and new operative procedures in uniformly structured and extensively illustrated contributions. All aspects are presented step-by-step from indications, contraindications, patient education, and preparation of the operation right through to postoperative care. The advantages and disadvantages, possible complications, deficiencies and risks of the methods as well as significant results with their evaluation criteria are discussed. To allow the reader to assess the outcome, results are detailed and based on internationally recognized scoring systems. Orthopedics and Traumatology facilitates effective advancement and further education for all those active in both special and conservative fields of orthopedics, traumatology, and general surgery, offers sup-port for therapeutic decision-making, and provides – more than 30 years after its first publication – constantly expanding and up-to-date teaching on operative techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信