SSRIs in the Treatment of Depression: A Pharmacological CUL-DE-SAC?

Q3 Neuroscience
Philip J Cowen
{"title":"SSRIs in the Treatment of Depression: A Pharmacological CUL-DE-SAC?","authors":"Philip J Cowen","doi":"10.1007/7854_2023_447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The widespread adoption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as first-line pharmacological treatments in the management of clinical depression transformed the landscape of drug therapy for this condition. SSRIs are safer and better tolerated than the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) that they replaced. However, they have limitations that may have placed a ceiling on the expectations of first-line pharmacological treatment. Notable problems with SSRIs include induction of anxiety on treatment initiation, delayed onset of significant therapeutic effect, sexual dysfunction, sleep disturbance and overall modest efficacy. The latter is linked with an inability of SSRIs to effectively treat syndromes of anhedonia and cognitive impairment. Combined serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), such as venlafaxine, have produced some limited improvements over SSRIs in efficacy, at the cost of a greater side-effect burden. Attempts to supplement serotonin reuptake activity with actions at serotonin receptor sub-types have not yet yielded substantial benefits; however, vortioxetine may provide more utility in the management of cognitive impairment. Future advances might come from the development of SNRIs, which more closely mimic the actions of effective TCAs. There may also be possible benefits to be derived from combining SSRIs with 5-HT<sub>4</sub> receptor agonists and 5-HT<sub>7</sub> receptor antagonists.</p>","PeriodicalId":11257,"journal":{"name":"Current topics in behavioral neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current topics in behavioral neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2023_447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread adoption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as first-line pharmacological treatments in the management of clinical depression transformed the landscape of drug therapy for this condition. SSRIs are safer and better tolerated than the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) that they replaced. However, they have limitations that may have placed a ceiling on the expectations of first-line pharmacological treatment. Notable problems with SSRIs include induction of anxiety on treatment initiation, delayed onset of significant therapeutic effect, sexual dysfunction, sleep disturbance and overall modest efficacy. The latter is linked with an inability of SSRIs to effectively treat syndromes of anhedonia and cognitive impairment. Combined serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), such as venlafaxine, have produced some limited improvements over SSRIs in efficacy, at the cost of a greater side-effect burden. Attempts to supplement serotonin reuptake activity with actions at serotonin receptor sub-types have not yet yielded substantial benefits; however, vortioxetine may provide more utility in the management of cognitive impairment. Future advances might come from the development of SNRIs, which more closely mimic the actions of effective TCAs. There may also be possible benefits to be derived from combining SSRIs with 5-HT4 receptor agonists and 5-HT7 receptor antagonists.

SSRIs治疗抑郁症:药理学CUL-DE-SAC?
选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)作为治疗临床抑郁症的一线药物治疗方法的广泛采用改变了这种疾病的药物治疗格局。SSRIs比它们所取代的三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)更安全,耐受性更好。然而,它们的局限性可能给一线药物治疗的期望值设置了上限。SSRIs的显著问题包括在治疗开始时引发焦虑、显著治疗效果的延迟发作、性功能障碍、睡眠障碍和总体适度疗效。后者与SSRIs无法有效治疗快感缺乏和认知障碍综合征有关。联合使用血清素和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs),如文拉法辛,在疗效上比SSRIs产生了一些有限的改善,但代价是更大的副作用负担。用血清素受体亚型的作用来补充血清素再摄取活性的尝试尚未产生实质性的益处;然而,沃替西汀可能在认知障碍的治疗中发挥更大的作用。未来的进展可能来自SNRI的开发,它更接近于有效TCA的作用。将SSRIs与5-HT4受体激动剂和5-HT7受体拮抗剂结合也可能产生益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信