A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis.

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY
Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2023-10-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2023.1244012
Jean Bousquet, Ludger Klimek, Hans-Christian Kuhl, Duc Tung Nguyen, Rajesh Kumar Ramalingam, G W Canonica, William E Berger
{"title":"A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis.","authors":"Jean Bousquet,&nbsp;Ludger Klimek,&nbsp;Hans-Christian Kuhl,&nbsp;Duc Tung Nguyen,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar Ramalingam,&nbsp;G W Canonica,&nbsp;William E Berger","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2023.1244012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) is a selective, non-sedating H1 antagonist with anti-inflammatory and mast cell stabilizing properties, which can be used as an alternative to intranasal corticosteroids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of 0.15% AZE compared to that of the placebo at a dosage of two sprays per nostril twice daily for 4 weeks in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 581 subjects were randomized in this double-blind (DB) placebo-controlled trial (NCT00712920) that compared 0.10% (1,096 μg daily) and 0.15% AZE (1,644 μg daily) to the placebo in PAR patients. The study consisted of a 7-day single-blind placebo lead-in period and a 28-day DB treatment period. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the 12-h reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) for the entire 28-day study period of 0.15% AZE, two sprays per nostril BID compared to the placebo. The efficacy and safety of 0.15% AZE were compared to the placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Least square (LS) mean improvement from baseline in the morning (AM) and evening (PM) combined rTNSS was statistically significant for the 0.15% AZE group (<i>p</i> = 0.04) compared to the placebo group. LS mean improvement from baseline in the AM and PM combined rTNSS was 4.10 (4.26) units for 0.15% AZE and 3.81 (3.99) for 0.10% AZE. For individual symptoms, there was a statistically significant change in the LS mean (<i>p</i> = 0.04) improvement from baseline on the 12-h reflective assessment for the 0.15% AZE group for runny nose. Further numerical improvements were shown for itchy nose, nasal congestion, runny nose, and sneezing compared to the placebo. No deaths or serious adverse events related to the study medication were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present formulation of 0.15% AZE is safe and effective in relieving PAR symptoms. It effectively relieves nasal and non-nasal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT00712920.</p>","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":"4 ","pages":"1244012"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1244012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) is a selective, non-sedating H1 antagonist with anti-inflammatory and mast cell stabilizing properties, which can be used as an alternative to intranasal corticosteroids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of 0.15% AZE compared to that of the placebo at a dosage of two sprays per nostril twice daily for 4 weeks in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).

Materials and methods: A total of 581 subjects were randomized in this double-blind (DB) placebo-controlled trial (NCT00712920) that compared 0.10% (1,096 μg daily) and 0.15% AZE (1,644 μg daily) to the placebo in PAR patients. The study consisted of a 7-day single-blind placebo lead-in period and a 28-day DB treatment period. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the 12-h reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) for the entire 28-day study period of 0.15% AZE, two sprays per nostril BID compared to the placebo. The efficacy and safety of 0.15% AZE were compared to the placebo.

Results: Least square (LS) mean improvement from baseline in the morning (AM) and evening (PM) combined rTNSS was statistically significant for the 0.15% AZE group (p = 0.04) compared to the placebo group. LS mean improvement from baseline in the AM and PM combined rTNSS was 4.10 (4.26) units for 0.15% AZE and 3.81 (3.99) for 0.10% AZE. For individual symptoms, there was a statistically significant change in the LS mean (p = 0.04) improvement from baseline on the 12-h reflective assessment for the 0.15% AZE group for runny nose. Further numerical improvements were shown for itchy nose, nasal congestion, runny nose, and sneezing compared to the placebo. No deaths or serious adverse events related to the study medication were reported.

Conclusion: The present formulation of 0.15% AZE is safe and effective in relieving PAR symptoms. It effectively relieves nasal and non-nasal symptoms.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT00712920.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

两剂盐酸氮卓斯汀治疗常年性过敏性鼻炎的疗效和安全性双盲安慰剂对照试验。
背景:盐酸氮卓斯汀(AZE)是一种选择性非镇静H1拮抗剂,具有抗炎和稳定肥大细胞的特性,可作为鼻内皮质类固醇的替代品。本研究的目的是评估0.15%AZE新配方与安慰剂相比,在常年性变应性鼻炎(标准杆数)患者中,每鼻孔两次,每天两次,为期4周的剂量。材料和方法:在这项双盲(DB)安慰剂对照试验(NCT00712920)中,共有581名受试者被随机分组,比较了0.10%(1096 μg每日)和0.15%AZE(1644 μg每日)给标准杆数患者的安慰剂。该研究包括7天的单盲安慰剂导入期和28天的DB治疗期。主要终点是与安慰剂相比,0.15%AZE、每个鼻孔BID两次喷雾的整个28天研究期间12小时反射性总鼻症状评分(rTNSS)与基线相比的变化。0.15%AZE的疗效和安全性与安慰剂进行了比较。结果:0.15%AZE组在上午(AM)和晚上(PM)联合rTNSS的最小二乘(LS)平均改善率与基线相比具有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。0.15%AZE和0.10%AZE的AM和PM联合rTNSS的LS平均改善率分别为4.10(4.26)和3.81(3.99)。对于个体症状,LS平均值有统计学意义的变化(p = 0.04)在0.15%AZE组流鼻涕的12小时反思性评估中比基线改善。与安慰剂相比,鼻痒、鼻塞、流鼻涕和打喷嚏的数值有了进一步的改善。未报告与研究药物相关的死亡或严重不良事件。结论:0.15%AZE制剂对缓解标准杆数症状安全有效。它能有效缓解鼻腔和非鼻腔症状。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT00712920。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信