Pharyngeal Airway Changes Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis as Evaluated with Laryngoscopy.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1177/10556656231204517
Mychajlo S Kosyk, Ryan L Ruiz, Matthew E Pontell, Anna R Carlson, Dillan F Villavisanis, Zachary D Zapatero, Christopher L Kalmar, Scott P Bartlett, Jesse A Taylor, Jordan W Swanson
{"title":"Pharyngeal Airway Changes Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis as Evaluated with Laryngoscopy.","authors":"Mychajlo S Kosyk, Ryan L Ruiz, Matthew E Pontell, Anna R Carlson, Dillan F Villavisanis, Zachary D Zapatero, Christopher L Kalmar, Scott P Bartlett, Jesse A Taylor, Jordan W Swanson","doi":"10.1177/10556656231204517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeMandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) may improve airway grade in patients with Robin Sequence (RS), but little is known about the response of the oropharyngeal airway to the distraction process in cases of tongue base obstruction (TBAO). This study used drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) to evaluate the impact of MDO on the oropharynx.MethodsRS patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were prospectively enrolled, and underwent DISE prior to MDO, and at the time of distractor removal. Laryngoscopy views, glossoptosis degree, polysomnography (PSG) results, oxygen saturations and airway measurements were compared pre- and post-MDO.ResultsTwenty patients met inclusion criteria. At the time of distractor placement, a grade II laryngoscopic view was most frequently observed (63%), and one patient (5%) had a grade I view. Median obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI) improved after MDO (49.1 [30.2-74.0] to 9.1, [3.9-18.0], <i>p </i>≤ .001). Median oxygen saturation nadir also improved (preoperative 69% [60-76] to 85% [82-91], <i>p </i>≤ .001). At distractor removal, mean laryngoscopic view improved (<i>p </i>≤ .002) with no views that were grade 3 or higher. Median intraoperative oropharyngeal width improved, (3.1 mm [2.8-4.4] to 6.0 mm [4.4-6.8], <i>p </i>≤ .021), as did median cephalometric anteroposterior oropharyngeal width (3.5 mm [2.7-4.1] to 6.3 mm [5.6-8.2], <i>p </i>≤ .002).ConclusionFollowing MDO, RS patients with TBAO have an approximate doubling of oropharyngeal width and an improvement in laryngoscopic grade. These findings likely contribute to improved oxygenation, OAHI and ease of intubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"361-370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231204517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeMandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) may improve airway grade in patients with Robin Sequence (RS), but little is known about the response of the oropharyngeal airway to the distraction process in cases of tongue base obstruction (TBAO). This study used drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) to evaluate the impact of MDO on the oropharynx.MethodsRS patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were prospectively enrolled, and underwent DISE prior to MDO, and at the time of distractor removal. Laryngoscopy views, glossoptosis degree, polysomnography (PSG) results, oxygen saturations and airway measurements were compared pre- and post-MDO.ResultsTwenty patients met inclusion criteria. At the time of distractor placement, a grade II laryngoscopic view was most frequently observed (63%), and one patient (5%) had a grade I view. Median obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI) improved after MDO (49.1 [30.2-74.0] to 9.1, [3.9-18.0], p ≤ .001). Median oxygen saturation nadir also improved (preoperative 69% [60-76] to 85% [82-91], p ≤ .001). At distractor removal, mean laryngoscopic view improved (p ≤ .002) with no views that were grade 3 or higher. Median intraoperative oropharyngeal width improved, (3.1 mm [2.8-4.4] to 6.0 mm [4.4-6.8], p ≤ .021), as did median cephalometric anteroposterior oropharyngeal width (3.5 mm [2.7-4.1] to 6.3 mm [5.6-8.2], p ≤ .002).ConclusionFollowing MDO, RS patients with TBAO have an approximate doubling of oropharyngeal width and an improvement in laryngoscopic grade. These findings likely contribute to improved oxygenation, OAHI and ease of intubation.

喉镜检查评估下颌牵引成骨后咽气道的变化。
目的:下颌牵张成骨(MDO)可以改善Robin序列(RS)患者的气道分级,但对舌根阻塞(TBAO)患者口咽气道对牵张过程的反应知之甚少。本研究使用药物诱导睡眠内镜(DISE)来评估MDO对口咽的影响。方法:前瞻性纳入患有严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的RS患者,并在MDO前和移除干扰物时进行DISE。比较了MDO前后的喉镜检查结果、舌下垂程度、多导睡眠图(PSG)结果、血氧饱和度和气道测量结果。结果:20名患者符合纳入标准。在放置干扰物时,最常见的是II级喉镜检查(63%),一名患者(5%)的检查结果为I级。MDO后中位阻塞性呼吸暂停低通气指数(OAHI)改善(49.1[30.2-74.0]至9.1,[3.9-18.0],p ≤ .001)。中位血氧饱和度最低点也有所改善(术前69%[60-76]至85%[82-91],p ≤ .001)。在移除牵开器时,平均喉镜视野改善(p ≤ .002),没有3级或更高级别的视图。术中口咽宽度中位数改善,(3.1 mm[2.8-4.4]至6.0 毫米[4.4-6.8],p ≤ .021),以及头部测量前后口咽宽度中位数(3.5 mm[2.7-4.1]至6.3 毫米[5.6-8.2],p ≤ .002)。结论:在MDO之后,患有TBAO的RS患者的口咽宽度大约增加了一倍,喉镜分级也有所改善。这些发现可能有助于改善氧合、OAHI和插管的简易性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信