Differences in self-perceptions of aging across the adult lifespan: The sample case of awareness of age-related gains and losses.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1037/pag0000783
Roman Kaspar, Oliver K Schilling, Manfred Diehl, Denis Gerstorf, Fiona S Rupprecht, Serena Sabatini, Hans-Werner Wahl
{"title":"Differences in self-perceptions of aging across the adult lifespan: The sample case of awareness of age-related gains and losses.","authors":"Roman Kaspar, Oliver K Schilling, Manfred Diehl, Denis Gerstorf, Fiona S Rupprecht, Serena Sabatini, Hans-Werner Wahl","doi":"10.1037/pag0000783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rooted in the premises of lifespan developmental theory, the concept of awareness of age-related change (AARC) posits that growing older comes with both experiences of gains and losses across different behavioral domains. However, little is known about how age-related change is perceived across the entire adult lifespan, provided that respective measures can be validly compared. Further, few studies have adopted an approach that examines gains and losses simultaneously to study a potential shift in the ratio of perceived age-related gains and losses from adolescence to advanced old age. Using cross-sectional data from the German Socio-Economic Panel, this study tested the measurement invariance of the 10-item AARC short form and examined age differences in the awareness of age-related changes across 1,612 participants aged 16-93 years. First, partial measurement invariance of the AARC-Gains and AARC-Losses scales was established, allowing for valid group comparisons across young adulthood, midlife, and old age. Second, results indicated that people experience more AARC-Gains than AARC-Losses throughout the adult lifespan. However, older adults exhibited an increasingly less favorable gains-to-losses ratio, primarily driven by more loss experiences. Gain experiences were mostly stable across age groups. Third, differences in levels of AARC were related to individuals' background characteristics relevant at the respective time of life, such as education (early adulthood), employment (midlife), and social resources (old age). These results highlight the utility of considering a broad age range when examining the nature and correlates of age differences in perceived age-related gains and losses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":"824-836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000783","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Rooted in the premises of lifespan developmental theory, the concept of awareness of age-related change (AARC) posits that growing older comes with both experiences of gains and losses across different behavioral domains. However, little is known about how age-related change is perceived across the entire adult lifespan, provided that respective measures can be validly compared. Further, few studies have adopted an approach that examines gains and losses simultaneously to study a potential shift in the ratio of perceived age-related gains and losses from adolescence to advanced old age. Using cross-sectional data from the German Socio-Economic Panel, this study tested the measurement invariance of the 10-item AARC short form and examined age differences in the awareness of age-related changes across 1,612 participants aged 16-93 years. First, partial measurement invariance of the AARC-Gains and AARC-Losses scales was established, allowing for valid group comparisons across young adulthood, midlife, and old age. Second, results indicated that people experience more AARC-Gains than AARC-Losses throughout the adult lifespan. However, older adults exhibited an increasingly less favorable gains-to-losses ratio, primarily driven by more loss experiences. Gain experiences were mostly stable across age groups. Third, differences in levels of AARC were related to individuals' background characteristics relevant at the respective time of life, such as education (early adulthood), employment (midlife), and social resources (old age). These results highlight the utility of considering a broad age range when examining the nature and correlates of age differences in perceived age-related gains and losses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

成年人一生中对衰老的自我认知差异:与年龄相关的得失意识的样本案例。
基于寿命发展理论的前提,与年龄相关的变化意识(AARC)的概念认为,随着年龄的增长,不同行为领域的得失都会随之而来。然而,对于在整个成年人寿命中如何感知与年龄相关的变化,人们知之甚少,前提是可以有效地比较各个指标。此外,很少有研究采用同时检查收益和损失的方法来研究感知的与年龄相关的收益和损失比率从青春期到高龄的潜在变化。本研究使用德国社会经济小组的横断面数据,测试了10项AARC简表的测量不变性,并调查了1612名16-93岁参与者对年龄相关变化的认识的年龄差异。首先,建立了AARC增益和AARC损失量表的部分测量不变性,允许对年轻成年、中年和老年进行有效的群体比较。其次,研究结果表明,在成年人的一生中,人们经历的AARC收益多于AARC损失。然而,老年人表现出越来越不利的得失比,这主要是由更多的损失经历驱动的。不同年龄组的增益体验基本稳定。第三,AARC水平的差异与个人在各自生活时期的背景特征有关,如教育(成年早期)、就业(中年)和社会资源(老年)。这些结果强调了在检查年龄差异的性质和相关性时考虑广泛的年龄范围在感知与年龄相关的收益和损失中的效用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信