Final-year medical students' reflections on types of significant events in primary care.

IF 1.2 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Samantha Dube, Motlatso Mlambo, Nontsikelelo O Mapukata O Mapukata
{"title":"Final-year medical students' reflections on types of significant events in primary care.","authors":"Samantha Dube, Motlatso Mlambo, Nontsikelelo O Mapukata O Mapukata","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.4099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Adverse events are considered a universal challenge and a burden in the provision of healthcare. For that reason, significant event analysis (SEA) is a critical undertaking in primary health care (PHC), particularly in South Africa where 84% of the population relies on the public health system for their care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> The study aimed to describe the types of perceived significant events medical students experienced during an integrated primary care block placement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Eighteen PHC settings included clinics, community health centres and district hospitals across three provinces in Gauteng, Mpumalanga and the North West.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Using a qualitative descriptive design with purposeful sampling and maximum variation, structured reflection reports were retrieved from logbooks of final-year medical students studying at a South African university in 2014. Conventional content analysis was used to record the relevant facets of secondary data from 124 logbooks that contained a recording of a significant event using MAXQDA software version 2020.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> An iterative process revealed three major themes of significant events that were prevalent in PHC settings. These comprised medication and prescription errors, diagnostic errors and suboptimal patient management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Significant event analysis became a critical quality improvement reflective learning tool. Logbooks offered an opportunity for medical students to explore significant events as a strategic way towards addressing quality and safe practices in PHC settings.Contribution: This study demonstrated medical students' ability to identify incidents in the care of patients using the SEA approach and their role in assessing patient safety issues in PHC settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"e1-e6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.4099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Adverse events are considered a universal challenge and a burden in the provision of healthcare. For that reason, significant event analysis (SEA) is a critical undertaking in primary health care (PHC), particularly in South Africa where 84% of the population relies on the public health system for their care.

Aim:  The study aimed to describe the types of perceived significant events medical students experienced during an integrated primary care block placement.

Setting:  Eighteen PHC settings included clinics, community health centres and district hospitals across three provinces in Gauteng, Mpumalanga and the North West.

Methods:  Using a qualitative descriptive design with purposeful sampling and maximum variation, structured reflection reports were retrieved from logbooks of final-year medical students studying at a South African university in 2014. Conventional content analysis was used to record the relevant facets of secondary data from 124 logbooks that contained a recording of a significant event using MAXQDA software version 2020.4.

Results:  An iterative process revealed three major themes of significant events that were prevalent in PHC settings. These comprised medication and prescription errors, diagnostic errors and suboptimal patient management.

Conclusion:  Significant event analysis became a critical quality improvement reflective learning tool. Logbooks offered an opportunity for medical students to explore significant events as a strategic way towards addressing quality and safe practices in PHC settings.Contribution: This study demonstrated medical students' ability to identify incidents in the care of patients using the SEA approach and their role in assessing patient safety issues in PHC settings.

医学系大四学生对初级保健中重大事件类型的思考。
背景:不良事件被认为是提供医疗保健的普遍挑战和负担。因此,重大事件分析(SEA)是初级卫生保健(PHC)的一项关键工作,尤其是在南非,84%的人口依赖公共卫生系统进行护理。目的:本研究旨在描述医学生在综合初级保健区安置期间经历的感知重大事件的类型。设置:豪登省、普马兰加省和西北部三个省的18个初级保健机构包括诊所、社区卫生中心和地区医院。方法:采用有目的的抽样和最大变异的定性描述性设计,从2014年南非一所大学医学系大四学生的日志中检索结构化反思报告。使用MAXQDA软件版本2020.4,使用常规内容分析记录124本日志中包含重大事件记录的二次数据的相关方面。结果:迭代过程揭示了PHC环境中普遍存在的重大事件的三个主要主题。其中包括药物和处方错误、诊断错误和患者管理不理想。结论:显著事件分析成为一种重要的质量改进反思性学习工具。航海日志为医学生提供了一个探索重大事件的机会,作为解决PHC环境中质量和安全实践的战略途径。贡献:这项研究展示了医学生使用SEA方法识别患者护理中事件的能力,以及他们在评估PHC环境中患者安全问题中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信