Development of a pain self-management intervention framework for people with spinal cord injury.

IF 1.2 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Mokgadi K Mashola, Elzette Korkie, Diphale J Mothabeng
{"title":"Development of a pain self-management intervention framework for people with spinal cord injury.","authors":"Mokgadi K Mashola,&nbsp;Elzette Korkie,&nbsp;Diphale J Mothabeng","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.4039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Pain is the most common reason for medical visits to primary health care practitioners. Pain self-management interventions are encouraged and there is no known self-management intervention framework available that clinicians and people with spinal cord injury (PWSCI) can use to guide treatment selection.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> This study aimed to develop a pain self-management intervention framework for PWSCI.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Online and facilitated in Gauteng, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A three-round modified e-Delphi method was used to reach an 80% consensus among a 21-expert panel. Fifty-nine interventions were distributed via REDCap and a final online audio meeting was held to either include or exclude interventions in the final framework. SPSS v27 was used to analyse descriptive data and content analysis was used for qualitative responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The final developed pain self-management framework consists of 56 interventions and includes interventions from multiple health professions to encompass medical, psychological, therapeutic and social interventions. Interventions are also specified for nociceptive and/or neuropathic pain and grouped according to the biopsychosocial model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The interprofessional framework may be used as a guideline for PWSCI to alleviate pain, as well as assist health professionals in clinical decision-making, by providing them with the freedom to choose acceptable and adequate interventions that may be appropriate to treat the affected individual's pain.Contribution: Pain management is a basic need at the primary healthcare level and PWSCI need access to the broad range of interventions available to manage their pain. The framework highlights the variety of appropriate interventions to guide both health professionals and PWSCI with pain relief options.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"e1-e12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.4039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Pain is the most common reason for medical visits to primary health care practitioners. Pain self-management interventions are encouraged and there is no known self-management intervention framework available that clinicians and people with spinal cord injury (PWSCI) can use to guide treatment selection.

Aim:  This study aimed to develop a pain self-management intervention framework for PWSCI.

Setting:  Online and facilitated in Gauteng, South Africa.

Methods:  A three-round modified e-Delphi method was used to reach an 80% consensus among a 21-expert panel. Fifty-nine interventions were distributed via REDCap and a final online audio meeting was held to either include or exclude interventions in the final framework. SPSS v27 was used to analyse descriptive data and content analysis was used for qualitative responses.

Results:  The final developed pain self-management framework consists of 56 interventions and includes interventions from multiple health professions to encompass medical, psychological, therapeutic and social interventions. Interventions are also specified for nociceptive and/or neuropathic pain and grouped according to the biopsychosocial model.

Conclusion:  The interprofessional framework may be used as a guideline for PWSCI to alleviate pain, as well as assist health professionals in clinical decision-making, by providing them with the freedom to choose acceptable and adequate interventions that may be appropriate to treat the affected individual's pain.Contribution: Pain management is a basic need at the primary healthcare level and PWSCI need access to the broad range of interventions available to manage their pain. The framework highlights the variety of appropriate interventions to guide both health professionals and PWSCI with pain relief options.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

为脊髓损伤患者开发疼痛自我管理干预框架。
背景:疼痛是初级保健医生就诊的最常见原因。鼓励疼痛自我管理干预,目前还没有已知的自我管理干预框架可供临床医生和脊髓损伤(PWSCI)患者用于指导治疗选择。目的:本研究旨在为PWSCI开发一个疼痛自我管理干预框架。设置:在线并在南非豪登省提供便利。方法:采用三轮改进的e-Delphi方法,在21个专家组中达成80%的一致意见。通过REDCap分发了59项干预措施,并举行了最后一次在线音频会议,将干预措施纳入或排除在最终框架中。SPSS v27用于分析描述性数据,内容分析用于定性反应。结果:最终制定的疼痛自我管理框架由56项干预措施组成,包括来自多个卫生专业的干预措施,包括医疗、心理、治疗和社会干预措施。干预措施也被指定用于伤害性和/或神经性疼痛,并根据生物心理社会模型进行分组。结论:跨专业框架可作为PWSCI的指南,通过让卫生专业人员自由选择适合治疗受影响个体疼痛的可接受和充分的干预措施,来减轻疼痛,并帮助他们做出临床决策。贡献:疼痛管理是初级医疗保健层面的基本需求,PWSCI需要获得广泛的干预措施来管理他们的疼痛。该框架强调了各种适当的干预措施,以指导卫生专业人员和PWSCI的疼痛缓解选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信