Exercise of professional autonomy of intensive care nurses in the pandemic scenario.

Q3 Nursing
Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS Pub Date : 2023-10-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2023.20220225.en
Rafaela Lira Mendes Costa, Regina Maria Dos Santos, Isabel Comassetto, Maria Ligia Dos Reis Bellaguarda
{"title":"Exercise of professional autonomy of intensive care nurses in the pandemic scenario.","authors":"Rafaela Lira Mendes Costa,&nbsp;Regina Maria Dos Santos,&nbsp;Isabel Comassetto,&nbsp;Maria Ligia Dos Reis Bellaguarda","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2023.20220225.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the exercise of professional autonomy of intensive care nurses during times of the new coronavirus pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A descriptive, qualitative study, conducted with 19 nurses from Intensive Care Units of two public hospitals and one private hospital. The information was produced from October 2020 to January 2021, through semi-structured interviews, using content analysis in thematic modality, guided by Eliot Freidson's Sociology of Professions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nursesargued that it was difficult, amidst the pandemic, to act with all the prerogatives assigned to them by their social mandate, for various reasons, such as limited knowledge about the disease, fragile teamwork communication, and scarcity of material and human resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The exercise of professional autonomy is shaped by the confrontation of multiple factors that impact the performance of intensive care nurses, especially in a context of pandemic crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2023.20220225.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the exercise of professional autonomy of intensive care nurses during times of the new coronavirus pandemic.

Method: A descriptive, qualitative study, conducted with 19 nurses from Intensive Care Units of two public hospitals and one private hospital. The information was produced from October 2020 to January 2021, through semi-structured interviews, using content analysis in thematic modality, guided by Eliot Freidson's Sociology of Professions.

Results: Nursesargued that it was difficult, amidst the pandemic, to act with all the prerogatives assigned to them by their social mandate, for various reasons, such as limited knowledge about the disease, fragile teamwork communication, and scarcity of material and human resources.

Conclusion: The exercise of professional autonomy is shaped by the confrontation of multiple factors that impact the performance of intensive care nurses, especially in a context of pandemic crisis.

在新冠疫情情况下,重症监护护士行使专业自主权。
目的:分析新型冠状病毒疫情期间重症监护护士职业自主性的行使情况。方法:对两所公立医院和一所私立医院重症监护室的19名护士进行描述性、定性研究。这些信息是在Eliot Freidson的《职业社会学》的指导下,于2020年10月至2021年1月通过半结构化访谈,使用主题形式的内容分析产生的。结果:Nurses认为,在疫情期间,由于各种原因,很难行使社会授权赋予他们的所有特权,比如对疾病的了解有限,团队合作沟通脆弱,物质和人力资源匮乏。结论:专业自主权的行使是由影响重症监护护士表现的多种因素共同作用形成的,尤其是在疫情危机的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信