Performance of risk scores in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia Pub Date : 2023-10-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20230032
Lídia Gomes, Samuel Pereira, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto, Cidália Rodrigues
{"title":"Performance of risk scores in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD.","authors":"Lídia Gomes, Samuel Pereira, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto, Cidália Rodrigues","doi":"10.36416/1806-3756/e20230032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are common causes of hospitalization. Various scoring systems have been proposed to classify the risk of clinical deterioration or mortality in hospitalized patients with AECOPD. We sought to investigate whether clinical deterioration and mortality scores at admission can predict adverse events occurring during hospitalization and after discharge of patients with AECOPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted with AECOPD. The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), the NEWS288-92%, the Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidemia, and atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) score, and the modified DECAF (mDECAF) score were calculated at admission. We assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance of the scores for the following outcomes: in-hospital mortality; need for invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation (NIV); long hospital stays; hospital readmissions; and future AECOPD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 119 patients admitted with AECOPD. The median age was 75 years, and 87.9% were male. The NEWS288-92% was associated with an 8.9% reduction in the number of individuals classified as requiring close, continuous observation, without an increased risk of death in the group of individuals classified as being low-risk patients. The NEWS288-92% and NEWS2 scores were found to be adequate in predicting the need for acute NIV and longer hospital stays. The DECAF and mDECAF scores were found to be better at predicting in-hospital mortality than the NEWS2 and NEWS288-92%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NEWS288-92% safely reduces the need for clinical monitoring in patients with AECOPD when compared with the NEWS2. The NEWS2 and NEWS288-92% appear to be good predictors of the length of hospital stay and need for NIV, but they do not replace the DECAF and mDECAF scores as predictors of mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14845,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10759966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20230032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are common causes of hospitalization. Various scoring systems have been proposed to classify the risk of clinical deterioration or mortality in hospitalized patients with AECOPD. We sought to investigate whether clinical deterioration and mortality scores at admission can predict adverse events occurring during hospitalization and after discharge of patients with AECOPD.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted with AECOPD. The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), the NEWS288-92%, the Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidemia, and atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) score, and the modified DECAF (mDECAF) score were calculated at admission. We assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance of the scores for the following outcomes: in-hospital mortality; need for invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation (NIV); long hospital stays; hospital readmissions; and future AECOPD.

Results: We included 119 patients admitted with AECOPD. The median age was 75 years, and 87.9% were male. The NEWS288-92% was associated with an 8.9% reduction in the number of individuals classified as requiring close, continuous observation, without an increased risk of death in the group of individuals classified as being low-risk patients. The NEWS288-92% and NEWS2 scores were found to be adequate in predicting the need for acute NIV and longer hospital stays. The DECAF and mDECAF scores were found to be better at predicting in-hospital mortality than the NEWS2 and NEWS288-92%.

Conclusions: The NEWS288-92% safely reduces the need for clinical monitoring in patients with AECOPD when compared with the NEWS2. The NEWS2 and NEWS288-92% appear to be good predictors of the length of hospital stay and need for NIV, but they do not replace the DECAF and mDECAF scores as predictors of mortality.

COPD急性加重患者的风险评分表现。
目的:COPD急性加重(AECOPD)是住院治疗的常见原因。已经提出了各种评分系统来对AECOPD住院患者的临床恶化或死亡风险进行分类。我们试图调查入院时的临床恶化和死亡率评分是否可以预测AECOPD患者住院期间和出院后发生的不良事件。方法:我们对AECOPD患者进行了回顾性研究。入院时计算国家早期预警评分2(NEWS2)、NEWS288-92%、呼吸困难、白细胞减少症、合并症、酸血症和心房颤动(DECAF)评分以及改良DECAF(mDECAF)得分。我们评估了以下结果评分的敏感性、特异性和总体表现:住院死亡率;需要有创机械通气或无创通气(NIV);长期住院;再次入院;以及未来的AECOPD。结果:我们纳入了119例AECOPD患者。中位年龄为75岁,87.9%为男性。NEWS288-92%与被归类为需要密切、持续观察的人数减少8.9%有关,而被归类为低风险患者的死亡风险没有增加。NEWS288-92%和NEWS2评分足以预测急性NIV和更长住院时间的需求。DECAF和mDECAF评分在预测住院死亡率方面优于NEWS2和NEWS288-92%。结论:与NEWS2相比,NEWS288-92%安全地减少了AECOPD患者的临床监测需求。NEWS2和NEWS288-92%似乎是住院时间和NIV需求的良好预测指标,但它们不能取代DECAF和mDECAF评分作为死亡率的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology publishes scientific articles that contribute to the improvement of knowledge in the field of the lung diseases and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信