Relationship between 1-, 3-, and 6-Month Gingival Bleeding Outcomes.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
JDR Clinical & Translational Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1177/23800844231206387
T He, J Grender, S Farrell, A R Biesbrock
{"title":"Relationship between 1-, 3-, and 6-Month Gingival Bleeding Outcomes.","authors":"T He, J Grender, S Farrell, A R Biesbrock","doi":"10.1177/23800844231206387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses show generally consistent antigingivitis effects between 3- and 6-mo observation time points with twice-daily use of stannous fluoride (SnF<sub>2</sub>) dentifrice. However, the relationship between 1-, 3-, and 6-mo gingivitis responses has not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pooled analysis was conducted to understand the relationship of 1-, 3-, and 6-mo gingival bleeding outcomes. Number of bleeding sites, derived from Löe-Silness Gingival Index (LSGI) or Gingival Bleeding Index, was identified as the primary end point of the analysis for the biological and clinical relevance. Randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical studies meeting the following predefined selection criteria were identified: 1) published and unpublished gingivitis clinical trials conducted from 1995 to 2022 comparing efficacy of 0.454% SnF<sub>2</sub> dentifrices to negative controls (sodium fluoride or sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice) and 2) studies with a 3-mo assessment and at least a 1- or 6-mo assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search resulted in ten 6-mo and fourteen 3-mo studies meeting selection criteria. A mixed-effects model was performed on the pooled data to assess gingival bleeding outcomes across time. The bleeding efficacy significantly increased between months 1 and 3 (<u>P</u> < 0.0001) and plateaued between months 3 and 6 (<u>P</u> = 0.007), supporting the fact that bleeding reduction relative to control established by 1 mo will increase and be maintained through 3 and 6 mo (<u>R</u><sup>2</sup> = 0.857). In addition, gingival bleeding and gingivitis efficacy, as measured by LSGI, were found to be highly correlated (<u>R</u><sup>2</sup> = 0.874).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A clear relationship has been demonstrated between 1-, 3-, and 6-mo gingival bleeding outcomes in gingivitis clinical studies comparing SnF<sub>2</sub> dentifrice to negative control dentifrice. These findings have important implications to the dental practice and scientific research as antigingivitis efficacy evaluations can be observed as early as 1 mo and are consistent with those seen at 3 or 6 mo.</p><p><strong>Knowledge transfer statement: </strong>Outcomes from this investigation indicate that the clinical evaluation of antigingivitis efficacy at 1 mo is predictive of that at 3 and 6 mo, supporting studies of 1-mo duration as a viable method of knowledge acquisition. This more efficient, expedited research design has positive implications for patient care, clinical practice guidelines, protocols, and policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14783,"journal":{"name":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":"286-293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844231206387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses show generally consistent antigingivitis effects between 3- and 6-mo observation time points with twice-daily use of stannous fluoride (SnF2) dentifrice. However, the relationship between 1-, 3-, and 6-mo gingivitis responses has not been investigated.

Methods: This pooled analysis was conducted to understand the relationship of 1-, 3-, and 6-mo gingival bleeding outcomes. Number of bleeding sites, derived from Löe-Silness Gingival Index (LSGI) or Gingival Bleeding Index, was identified as the primary end point of the analysis for the biological and clinical relevance. Randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical studies meeting the following predefined selection criteria were identified: 1) published and unpublished gingivitis clinical trials conducted from 1995 to 2022 comparing efficacy of 0.454% SnF2 dentifrices to negative controls (sodium fluoride or sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice) and 2) studies with a 3-mo assessment and at least a 1- or 6-mo assessment.

Results: The search resulted in ten 6-mo and fourteen 3-mo studies meeting selection criteria. A mixed-effects model was performed on the pooled data to assess gingival bleeding outcomes across time. The bleeding efficacy significantly increased between months 1 and 3 (P < 0.0001) and plateaued between months 3 and 6 (P = 0.007), supporting the fact that bleeding reduction relative to control established by 1 mo will increase and be maintained through 3 and 6 mo (R2 = 0.857). In addition, gingival bleeding and gingivitis efficacy, as measured by LSGI, were found to be highly correlated (R2 = 0.874).

Conclusion: A clear relationship has been demonstrated between 1-, 3-, and 6-mo gingival bleeding outcomes in gingivitis clinical studies comparing SnF2 dentifrice to negative control dentifrice. These findings have important implications to the dental practice and scientific research as antigingivitis efficacy evaluations can be observed as early as 1 mo and are consistent with those seen at 3 or 6 mo.

Knowledge transfer statement: Outcomes from this investigation indicate that the clinical evaluation of antigingivitis efficacy at 1 mo is predictive of that at 3 and 6 mo, supporting studies of 1-mo duration as a viable method of knowledge acquisition. This more efficient, expedited research design has positive implications for patient care, clinical practice guidelines, protocols, and policies.

1个月、3个月和6个月牙龈出血结果之间的关系。
引言:系统综述和荟萃分析的结果显示,每天使用两次氟化亚锡(SnF2)洁牙剂,在3个月和6个月的观察时间点之间,抗牙龈炎效果总体一致。然而,1、3和6个月牙龈炎反应之间的关系尚未得到研究。方法:进行此汇总分析以了解1、3和6个月牙龈出血结果的关系。根据Löe-Silness牙龈指数(LSGI)或牙龈出血指数得出的出血部位数量被确定为生物学和临床相关性分析的主要终点。随机、双盲、,确定了符合以下预定义选择标准的对照临床研究:1)1995年至2022年进行的已发表和未发表的牙龈炎临床试验,比较0.454%SnF2洁牙剂与阴性对照(氟化钠或单氟磷酸钠洁牙剂)的疗效;2)进行3个月评估和至少1个月或6个月评估的研究。结果:检索得到10项6个月和14项3个月的研究符合选择标准。对合并数据进行混合效应模型,以评估不同时间的牙龈出血结果。出血疗效在第1个月和第3个月之间显著增加(P<0.0001),在第3个和第6个月之间趋于平稳(P=0.007),这支持了一个事实,即相对于1个月前建立的对照,出血减少将增加并维持到3个和6个月(R2=0.857)。此外,通过LSGI测量的牙龈出血和牙龈炎疗效,结论:在比较SnF2洁牙剂和阴性对照洁牙剂的牙龈炎临床研究中,1、3和6个月牙龈出血结果之间存在明确的关系。这些发现对牙科实践和科学研究具有重要意义,因为抗牙龈炎疗效评估最早可以在1个月内观察到,并且与3个月或6个月时的疗效评估一致,支持为期1个月的研究,作为一种可行的知识获取方法。这种更高效、快速的研究设计对患者护理、临床实践指南、方案和政策具有积极意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
JDR Clinical & Translational Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: JDR Clinical & Translational Research seeks to publish the highest quality research articles on clinical and translational research including all of the dental specialties and implantology. Examples include behavioral sciences, cariology, oral & pharyngeal cancer, disease diagnostics, evidence based health care delivery, human genetics, health services research, periodontal diseases, oral medicine, radiology, and pathology. The JDR Clinical & Translational Research expands on its research content by including high-impact health care and global oral health policy statements and systematic reviews of clinical concepts affecting clinical practice. Unique to the JDR Clinical & Translational Research are advances in clinical and translational medicine articles created to focus on research with an immediate potential to affect clinical therapy outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信