Risk and Timing of Major Bleeding Complications Requiring Intervention of the Percutaneous Kidney Biopsy With a Short Observation Protocol: A Retrospective Chart Review.

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease Pub Date : 2023-10-31 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20543581231205334
Melissa Schorr, Pavel S Roshanov, Jeremy Vandelinde, Andrew A House
{"title":"Risk and Timing of Major Bleeding Complications Requiring Intervention of the Percutaneous Kidney Biopsy With a Short Observation Protocol: A Retrospective Chart Review.","authors":"Melissa Schorr,&nbsp;Pavel S Roshanov,&nbsp;Jeremy Vandelinde,&nbsp;Andrew A House","doi":"10.1177/20543581231205334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously published a retrospective study of kidney biopsies performed in a tertiary care hospital in London, Ontario from 2012 to 2017. This study resulted in a change of practice in our institution to shorter postbiopsy monitoring for outpatients as well as the development of a risk calculator to predict serious bleeding complications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to determine whether this shorter monitoring time is adequate in the outpatient setting. A secondary objective was to validate the bleeding risk calculator in both inpatients and outpatients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was performed at a tertiary academic hospital in London, Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 400 adult patients who underwent kidney biopsy between April 30, 2018 and February 25, 2022 at a tertiary academic hospital in London, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed frequency and timing of major bleeding complications in patients who underwent kidney biopsy. In secondary analyses, we examined the prediction performance of the risk calculator in discrimination and calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (1.8%). Five of these patients required blood transfusions (1.3%) and 2 required embolization (0.5%). In the outpatient setting, any major bleeding events were identified immediately (1 patient) or on the routine 2-hour ultrasounds (1 patient). The risk calculator showed good discrimination (C-statistic, 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.84 to 0.95]) and calibration (slope, 1.10, 95% CI = [0.47 to 1.74]; intercept, 95% CI = -0.02 [-0.79 to 0.75]), but with much uncertainty in the estimates.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The occurrence of only a few major bleeding events limits the reliability of our assessment of our risk calculator.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There appears to be little yield in extending observation beyond 2 hours after an outpatient kidney biopsy with the use of immediate and 2-hour postbiopsy ultrasounds. The bleeding risk calculator (http://perioperativerisk.com/kbrc) warrants further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"10 ","pages":"20543581231205334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581231205334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We previously published a retrospective study of kidney biopsies performed in a tertiary care hospital in London, Ontario from 2012 to 2017. This study resulted in a change of practice in our institution to shorter postbiopsy monitoring for outpatients as well as the development of a risk calculator to predict serious bleeding complications.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether this shorter monitoring time is adequate in the outpatient setting. A secondary objective was to validate the bleeding risk calculator in both inpatients and outpatients.

Design: This was a retrospective chart review.

Setting: This study was performed at a tertiary academic hospital in London, Ontario, Canada.

Participants: This was a retrospective study of 400 adult patients who underwent kidney biopsy between April 30, 2018 and February 25, 2022 at a tertiary academic hospital in London, Canada.

Methods: We retrospectively assessed frequency and timing of major bleeding complications in patients who underwent kidney biopsy. In secondary analyses, we examined the prediction performance of the risk calculator in discrimination and calibration.

Results: Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (1.8%). Five of these patients required blood transfusions (1.3%) and 2 required embolization (0.5%). In the outpatient setting, any major bleeding events were identified immediately (1 patient) or on the routine 2-hour ultrasounds (1 patient). The risk calculator showed good discrimination (C-statistic, 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.84 to 0.95]) and calibration (slope, 1.10, 95% CI = [0.47 to 1.74]; intercept, 95% CI = -0.02 [-0.79 to 0.75]), but with much uncertainty in the estimates.

Limitations: The occurrence of only a few major bleeding events limits the reliability of our assessment of our risk calculator.

Conclusions: There appears to be little yield in extending observation beyond 2 hours after an outpatient kidney biopsy with the use of immediate and 2-hour postbiopsy ultrasounds. The bleeding risk calculator (http://perioperativerisk.com/kbrc) warrants further validation.

需要短期观察方案介入经皮肾活检的主要出血并发症的风险和时机:回顾性图表回顾。
背景:我们之前发表了一项对2012年至2017年在安大略省伦敦一家三级护理医院进行的肾活检的回顾性研究。这项研究改变了我们机构的做法,缩短了门诊患者的术后监测时间,并开发了一种预测严重出血并发症的风险计算器。目的:本研究的主要目的是确定这种较短的监测时间在门诊环境中是否足够。第二个目的是验证住院患者和门诊患者的出血风险计算器。设计:这是一个回顾性图表回顾。背景:这项研究在加拿大安大略省伦敦的一家三级学院医院进行。参与者:这是一项对2018年4月30日至2022年2月25日在加拿大伦敦一家三级学术医院接受肾活检的400名成年患者的回顾性研究。方法:我们回顾性评估了肾活检患者主要出血并发症的发生频率和时间。在二次分析中,我们检验了风险计算器在判别和校准方面的预测性能。结果:7名患者(1.8%)发生大出血。其中5名患者需要输血(1.3%),2名患者需要栓塞(0.5%)。在门诊环境中,任何大出血事件都能立即发现(1名患者)或在常规2小时超声波检查中发现(1例患者)。风险计算器显示出良好的辨别能力(C统计量,0.91,95%置信区间[CI]=[0.84至0.95])和校准能力(斜率,1.10,95%可信区间=[0.47至1.74];截距,95%可信可信区间=-0.02[-0.79至0.75]),但估计值存在很大的不确定性。局限性:只有少数重大出血事件的发生限制了我们对风险计算器评估的可靠性。结论:在门诊肾活检后,使用即时和2小时的眼压后超声将观察时间延长到2小时以上似乎收效甚微。出血风险计算器(http://perioperativerisk.com/kbrc)值得进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, the official journal of the Canadian Society of Nephrology, is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encourages high quality submissions focused on clinical, translational and health services delivery research in the field of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, kidney transplantation and organ donation. Our mandate is to promote and advocate for kidney health as it impacts national and international communities. Basic science, translational studies and clinical studies will be peer reviewed and processed by an Editorial Board comprised of geographically diverse Canadian and international nephrologists, internists and allied health professionals; this Editorial Board is mandated to ensure highest quality publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信