Intravenous Iron for Heart Failure: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Angiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1177/00033197231213181
Witina Techasatian, Yoshito Nishimura, Manasawee Tanariyakul, Clarke Morihara, Chinnawat Arayangkool, Alexander Settle, Noppawit Aiumtrakul, Jakrin Kewcharoen
{"title":"Intravenous Iron for Heart Failure: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Witina Techasatian, Yoshito Nishimura, Manasawee Tanariyakul, Clarke Morihara, Chinnawat Arayangkool, Alexander Settle, Noppawit Aiumtrakul, Jakrin Kewcharoen","doi":"10.1177/00033197231213181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the administration of intravenous (IV) iron to those with heart failure has been implicated to be associated with a possible reduction in hospitalizations and improvement in symptoms, a recent large multicenter trial only showed modest benefits in reducing hospitalization, necessitating the updated systematic review. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE database until January 9, 2023. Outcomes included total heart failure hospitalizations, first heart failure hospitalization, six-minute walk test (6MWT) distance, and incidence of infection. There were 13 studies with 3410 participants (1,790 with IV iron). Pooled analysis that reported the incidence of cardiovascular death showed that patients with IV iron did not have significantly lower odds of cardiovascular death or first heart failure hospitalization. In contrast, those who received IV iron had significantly lower total heart failure hospitalization (pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.90, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> 59.0%, <i>P</i> = .017) and a composite of cardiovascular death and first heart failure hospitalization (pooled OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.47-0.64, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> 0%, <i>P</i> = .656). While the efficacy is modest, IV iron therapy could be associated with reduced hospitalization for heart failure without significant adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"370-381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197231213181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the administration of intravenous (IV) iron to those with heart failure has been implicated to be associated with a possible reduction in hospitalizations and improvement in symptoms, a recent large multicenter trial only showed modest benefits in reducing hospitalization, necessitating the updated systematic review. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE database until January 9, 2023. Outcomes included total heart failure hospitalizations, first heart failure hospitalization, six-minute walk test (6MWT) distance, and incidence of infection. There were 13 studies with 3410 participants (1,790 with IV iron). Pooled analysis that reported the incidence of cardiovascular death showed that patients with IV iron did not have significantly lower odds of cardiovascular death or first heart failure hospitalization. In contrast, those who received IV iron had significantly lower total heart failure hospitalization (pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.90, I 2 59.0%, P = .017) and a composite of cardiovascular death and first heart failure hospitalization (pooled OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.47-0.64, I 2 0%, P = .656). While the efficacy is modest, IV iron therapy could be associated with reduced hospitalization for heart failure without significant adverse events.

静脉注射铁治疗心力衰竭:最新系统综述和荟萃分析。
虽然心力衰竭患者静脉注射铁与可能减少住院人数和改善症状有关,但最近的一项大型多中心试验仅显示出在减少住院方面的适度益处,因此有必要进行最新的系统审查。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,搜索MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库,直到2023年1月9日。结果包括总的心力衰竭住院、首次心力衰竭住院、6分钟步行测试(6MWT)距离和感染发生率。共有13项研究,共有3410名参与者(1790名接受静脉注射铁)。报告心血管死亡发生率的汇总分析表明,静脉注射铁的患者心血管死亡或首次心力衰竭住院的几率并没有显著降低。相比之下,接受静脉注射铁治疗的患者的总心力衰竭住院率显著较低(合并优势比(OR)0.63,95%置信区间(CI)0.44-0.90,I2 59.0%,P=.017),心血管死亡和首次心力衰竭住院的复合率(合并OR 0.55,95%CI 0.47-0.64,I2 0%,P=.656),静脉注射铁治疗可以减少心力衰竭的住院时间,而不会出现重大不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Angiology
Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A presentation of original, peer-reviewed original articles, review and case reports relative to all phases of all vascular diseases, Angiology (ANG) offers more than a typical cardiology journal. With approximately 1000 pages per year covering diagnostic methods, therapeutic approaches, and clinical and laboratory research, ANG is among the most informative publications in the field of peripheral vascular and cardiovascular diseases. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 13 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信