Application of linear and machine learning models to genomic prediction of fatty acid composition in Japanese Black cattle

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Motohide Nishio, Keiichi Inoue, Aisaku Arakawa, Kasumi Ichinoseki, Eiji Kobayashi, Toshihiro Okamura, Yo Fukuzawa, Shinichiro Ogawa, Masaaki Taniguchi, Mika Oe, Masayuki Takeda, Takehiro Kamata, Masaru Konno, Michihiro Takagi, Mario Sekiya, Tamotsu Matsuzawa, Yoshinobu Inoue, Akihiro Watanabe, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Eri Shibata, Akihumi Ohtani, Ryu Yazaki, Ryotaro Nakashima, Kazuo Ishii
{"title":"Application of linear and machine learning models to genomic prediction of fatty acid composition in Japanese Black cattle","authors":"Motohide Nishio,&nbsp;Keiichi Inoue,&nbsp;Aisaku Arakawa,&nbsp;Kasumi Ichinoseki,&nbsp;Eiji Kobayashi,&nbsp;Toshihiro Okamura,&nbsp;Yo Fukuzawa,&nbsp;Shinichiro Ogawa,&nbsp;Masaaki Taniguchi,&nbsp;Mika Oe,&nbsp;Masayuki Takeda,&nbsp;Takehiro Kamata,&nbsp;Masaru Konno,&nbsp;Michihiro Takagi,&nbsp;Mario Sekiya,&nbsp;Tamotsu Matsuzawa,&nbsp;Yoshinobu Inoue,&nbsp;Akihiro Watanabe,&nbsp;Hiroshi Kobayashi,&nbsp;Eri Shibata,&nbsp;Akihumi Ohtani,&nbsp;Ryu Yazaki,&nbsp;Ryotaro Nakashima,&nbsp;Kazuo Ishii","doi":"10.1111/asj.13883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We collected 3180 records of oleic acid (C18:1) and monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) measured using gas chromatography (GC) and 6960 records of C18:1 and MUFA measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in intermuscular fat samples of Japanese Black cattle. We compared genomic prediction performance for four linear models (genomic best linear unbiased prediction [GBLUP], kinship-adjusted multiple loci [KAML], BayesC, and BayesLASSO) and five machine learning models (Gaussian kernel [GK], deep kernel [DK], random forest [RF], extreme gradient boost [XGB], and convolutional neural network [CNN]). For GC-based C18:1 and MUFA, KAML showed the highest accuracies, followed by BayesC, XGB, DK, GK, and BayesLASSO, with more than 6% gain of accuracy by KAML over GBLUP. Meanwhile, DK had the highest prediction accuracy for NIRS-based C18:1 and MUFA, but the difference in accuracies between DK and KAML was slight. For all traits, accuracies of RF and CNN were lower than those of GBLUP. The KAML extends GBLUP methods, of which marker effects are weighted, and involves only additive genetic effects; whereas machine learning methods capture non-additive genetic effects. Thus, KAML is the most suitable method for breeding of fatty acid composition in Japanese Black cattle.</p>","PeriodicalId":7890,"journal":{"name":"Animal Science Journal","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asj.13883","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We collected 3180 records of oleic acid (C18:1) and monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) measured using gas chromatography (GC) and 6960 records of C18:1 and MUFA measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in intermuscular fat samples of Japanese Black cattle. We compared genomic prediction performance for four linear models (genomic best linear unbiased prediction [GBLUP], kinship-adjusted multiple loci [KAML], BayesC, and BayesLASSO) and five machine learning models (Gaussian kernel [GK], deep kernel [DK], random forest [RF], extreme gradient boost [XGB], and convolutional neural network [CNN]). For GC-based C18:1 and MUFA, KAML showed the highest accuracies, followed by BayesC, XGB, DK, GK, and BayesLASSO, with more than 6% gain of accuracy by KAML over GBLUP. Meanwhile, DK had the highest prediction accuracy for NIRS-based C18:1 and MUFA, but the difference in accuracies between DK and KAML was slight. For all traits, accuracies of RF and CNN were lower than those of GBLUP. The KAML extends GBLUP methods, of which marker effects are weighted, and involves only additive genetic effects; whereas machine learning methods capture non-additive genetic effects. Thus, KAML is the most suitable method for breeding of fatty acid composition in Japanese Black cattle.

线性和机器学习模型在日本黑牛脂肪酸组成基因组预测中的应用
采用气相色谱法测定了日本黑牛肌间脂肪样品中的油酸(C18:1)和单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)含量3180条,近红外光谱法测定了C18:1和MUFA含量6960条。我们比较了四种线性模型(基因组最佳线性无偏预测[GBLUP]、亲缘关系调整多位点[KAML]、BayesC和BayesLASSO)和五种机器学习模型(高斯核[GK]、深度核[DK]、随机森林[RF]、极端梯度增强[XGB]和卷积神经网络[CNN])的基因组预测性能。对于基于gc的C18:1和MUFA, KAML的准确率最高,其次是BayesC、XGB、DK、GK和BayesLASSO, KAML的准确率比GBLUP提高6%以上。同时,DK对NIRS-based C18:1和MUFA的预测精度最高,但DK与KAML的预测精度差异不大。对于所有性状,RF和CNN的准确率均低于GBLUP。KAML扩展了GBLUP方法,其中标记效应是加权的,并且只涉及加性遗传效应;而机器学习方法捕捉非加性遗传效应。因此,KAML是最适合日本黑牛脂肪酸组成的育种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Science Journal
Animal Science Journal 生物-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Animal Science Journal (a continuation of Animal Science and Technology) is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Animal Science (JSAS) and publishes Original Research Articles (full papers and rapid communications) in English in all fields of animal and poultry science: genetics and breeding, genetic engineering, reproduction, embryo manipulation, nutrition, feeds and feeding, physiology, anatomy, environment and behavior, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, and livestock economics. Animal Science Journal will invite Review Articles in consultations with Editors. Submission to the Journal is open to those who are interested in animal science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信