Diagnosing Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Using Color Fundus Photography, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-25 DOI:10.3341/kjo.2023.0085
Sejun Park, Junwoo Lee, Jong Beom Park, Eung Suk Kim, Seung-Young Yu, Min Seok Kang, Kiyoung Kim
{"title":"Diagnosing Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Using Color Fundus Photography, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.","authors":"Sejun Park, Junwoo Lee, Jong Beom Park, Eung Suk Kim, Seung-Young Yu, Min Seok Kang, Kiyoung Kim","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2023.0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic accuracy of differentiating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) from exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), using color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and swept-source OCT angiography (SS-OCTA) without using indocyanine green angiography (ICGA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Treatment-naive eyes with exudative AMD that underwent CFP, OCT, SS-OCTA, and ICGA imaging before treatment were identified. Images of each patient were categorized into two sets (set A, CFP + OCT; set B, CFP + SS-OCTA). In set B, both the en face and cross-sectional B scans were analyzed. Each set was reviewed by two graders, and it was determined whether the presumed diagnosis was PCV. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the diagnosis of PCV were assessed for each set by comparing diagnoses that included ICGA. The number of polypoidal lesions in each set was calculated and compared to ICGA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 94 eyes from 94 patients with AMD were included in the study, of which 66.0% were male, and the mean age was 71.8 ± 9.0 years. The PCV diagnosis rate using ICGA was 45.7%. The sensitivity was 0.88 for set A and 0.93 for set B, while the specificity was 0.94 for set A and 0.96 for set B. The AUC was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.97) for set A and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.90-1.00) for set B. Set A detected 1.28 ± 0.91 polypoidal lesions, while set B detected 1.47 ± 1.01; ICGA showed 1.51 ± 0.86.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that, without using ICGA, both CFP combined with OCT and CFP combined with SS-OCTA demonstrate high sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in diagnosing PCV. It is evident that SS-OCTA contributes to enhancing sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for PCV diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":101356,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","volume":" ","pages":"468-476"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10721403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2023.0085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of differentiating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) from exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), using color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and swept-source OCT angiography (SS-OCTA) without using indocyanine green angiography (ICGA).

Methods: Treatment-naive eyes with exudative AMD that underwent CFP, OCT, SS-OCTA, and ICGA imaging before treatment were identified. Images of each patient were categorized into two sets (set A, CFP + OCT; set B, CFP + SS-OCTA). In set B, both the en face and cross-sectional B scans were analyzed. Each set was reviewed by two graders, and it was determined whether the presumed diagnosis was PCV. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the diagnosis of PCV were assessed for each set by comparing diagnoses that included ICGA. The number of polypoidal lesions in each set was calculated and compared to ICGA.

Results: A total of 94 eyes from 94 patients with AMD were included in the study, of which 66.0% were male, and the mean age was 71.8 ± 9.0 years. The PCV diagnosis rate using ICGA was 45.7%. The sensitivity was 0.88 for set A and 0.93 for set B, while the specificity was 0.94 for set A and 0.96 for set B. The AUC was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.97) for set A and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.90-1.00) for set B. Set A detected 1.28 ± 0.91 polypoidal lesions, while set B detected 1.47 ± 1.01; ICGA showed 1.51 ± 0.86.

Conclusions: This study highlights that, without using ICGA, both CFP combined with OCT and CFP combined with SS-OCTA demonstrate high sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in diagnosing PCV. It is evident that SS-OCTA contributes to enhancing sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for PCV diagnosis.

应用彩色眼底摄影、光学相干断层扫描和光学相干断层成像血管造影诊断息肉状脉络膜血管病。
目的:比较彩色眼底摄影术(CFP)、光学相干断层扫描术(OCT)鉴别息肉状脉络膜血管病(PCV)和渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的诊断准确性,和扫描源光学相干断层扫描血管造影术(SS-OCTA),而不使用荧光素血管造影学/吲哚青绿血管造影法(FA/ICGA)。方法:确定治疗前接受CFP、OCT、SS-OCTA和FA/ICGA成像的渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的幼稚眼。每个患者的图像分为2组(A组:CFP+OCT;B组:CFP+SS-OCTA)。在B组中,分析了表面和横截面B扫描。每一组都由两名评分者进行审查,并确定推定诊断是否为PCV。通过比较包括ICGA在内的诊断,评估各组PCV诊断的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。计算各组息肉样病变的数量,并与ICGA进行比较。结果:本研究共纳入94例AMD患者的94只研究眼,其中66.0%为男性,平均年龄为71.8±9.0岁。ICGA对PCV的诊断率为45.7%,A、B组敏感性分别为0.88、0.93;特异性:0.94,0.96;阳性预测值:0.93,0.95;阴性预测值:0.91,0.94,AUC:0.90(95%可信区间[CI]:0.83-0.97),0.96(95%CI:0.90-100)。A组检测息肉样病变1.28±0.91,B组检测息肉状病变1.47±1.01,ICGA显示1.51±0.86。在类间相关系数分析中,Set A和ICGA之间的相关性为ICC=0.76(95%CI:0.60-0.86,P结论:本研究强调,在不使用ICGA的情况下,CFP联合OCT和CFP联合SS-OCTA在诊断PCV时都表现出高灵敏度、特异性和AUC。很明显,SS-OCTA有助于提高PCV诊断的灵敏度、特异性和AUC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信