The Importance of Basal Cell Carcinoma Risk Stratification and Potential Future Pathways.

Q3 Medicine
JMIR dermatology Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.2196/50309
Sharad Paul, Allanah Knight
{"title":"The Importance of Basal Cell Carcinoma Risk Stratification and Potential Future Pathways.","authors":"Sharad Paul, Allanah Knight","doi":"10.2196/50309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human cancer. Although there are surgical and topical treatments available, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, leading to higher costs. What is needed is an accurate risk assessment of BCC so that treatments can be planned in a patient-centered manner.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we will review the literature about guidelines for the management of BCC and analyze the potential indicators of high-risk BCC. Using this risk assessment approach, we will propose pathways that will be able to optimize treatments more efficiently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper presents a perspective from a skin cancer expert and clinic involved in the treatment of both simple and complex cases of BCC. It addresses the key challenges associated with accurate risk stratification prior to any treatment or procedure. Different immunohistochemical and angiogenic markers for high-risk BCC were reviewed in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expression of interleukin-6, vascular endothelial growth factor, and mast cells within BCC correlates with its aggressiveness. Other immunohistochemical markers, such as Cyclin D1 and Bcl-2, also play a significant role-Cyclin D1 is higher in the aggressive BCC, while Bcl-2 is lower in the aggressive BCC, compared to the nonaggressive variants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our research, we will conclude that using immunohistochemical and angiogenic markers for risk assessment and stratification of BCC can help optimize treatment, ensuring that surgical procedures are used only when necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"6 ","pages":"e50309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human cancer. Although there are surgical and topical treatments available, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, leading to higher costs. What is needed is an accurate risk assessment of BCC so that treatments can be planned in a patient-centered manner.

Objective: In this study, we will review the literature about guidelines for the management of BCC and analyze the potential indicators of high-risk BCC. Using this risk assessment approach, we will propose pathways that will be able to optimize treatments more efficiently.

Methods: This paper presents a perspective from a skin cancer expert and clinic involved in the treatment of both simple and complex cases of BCC. It addresses the key challenges associated with accurate risk stratification prior to any treatment or procedure. Different immunohistochemical and angiogenic markers for high-risk BCC were reviewed in this study.

Results: The expression of interleukin-6, vascular endothelial growth factor, and mast cells within BCC correlates with its aggressiveness. Other immunohistochemical markers, such as Cyclin D1 and Bcl-2, also play a significant role-Cyclin D1 is higher in the aggressive BCC, while Bcl-2 is lower in the aggressive BCC, compared to the nonaggressive variants.

Conclusions: Based on our research, we will conclude that using immunohistochemical and angiogenic markers for risk assessment and stratification of BCC can help optimize treatment, ensuring that surgical procedures are used only when necessary.

基底细胞癌风险分层的重要性和潜在的未来途径。
背景:基底细胞癌(BCC)是人类最常见的癌症。尽管有手术和局部治疗,但手术仍然是治疗的支柱,导致成本更高。需要的是对基底细胞癌进行准确的风险评估,以便以患者为中心规划治疗。目的:在本研究中,我们将回顾有关BCC管理指南的文献,并分析高危BCC的潜在指标。使用这种风险评估方法,我们将提出能够更有效地优化治疗的途径。方法:本文从癌症专家和临床角度介绍了BCC的简单和复杂病例的治疗。它解决了在任何治疗或程序之前与准确的风险分层相关的关键挑战。本研究综述了高危基底细胞癌的不同免疫组织化学和血管生成标志物。结果:白细胞介素-6、血管内皮生长因子和肥大细胞在基底细胞癌中的表达与其侵袭性相关。其他免疫组织化学标记物,如细胞周期蛋白D1和Bcl-2,也发挥着重要作用。与非侵袭性变体相比,细胞周期蛋白D1-在侵袭性BCC中较高,而Bcl-2在侵袭性BCC中较低。结论:根据我们的研究,我们将得出结论,使用免疫组织化学和血管生成标记物对基底细胞癌进行风险评估和分层有助于优化治疗,确保只有在必要时才使用外科手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信