An exploration of the cultural appropriateness of the family-centered function-focused care intervention.

Dementia (London, England) Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1177/14713012231206288
Rhonda BeLue, Ashley Kuzmik, Michaila Dix, Camille Luckett, Anju Paudel, Barbara Resnick, Marie Boltz
{"title":"An exploration of the cultural appropriateness of the family-centered function-focused care intervention.","authors":"Rhonda BeLue, Ashley Kuzmik, Michaila Dix, Camille Luckett, Anju Paudel, Barbara Resnick, Marie Boltz","doi":"10.1177/14713012231206288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Family-centered Function Focused Care (Fam-FFC) intervention, is a nurse-family care partnership model aimed to improve the physical and cognitive recovery in hospitalized persons living with Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (ADRD) while improving the care partner's experiences. Discussions of patients' needs and preferences between nurses and the patient's close family members have been found to be useful in preventing excessive stress in persons with dementia, while lessening the anxiety of care partners. However, the efficacy of dementia-specific interventions is influenced in part by the degree to which the interventions are flexible and sensitive to the patient's and care-partner's condition, needs, and preferences, including cultural preferences. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the cultural appropriateness of Fam-FFC using the Ecological Validity Model (EVM). This qualitative, descriptive study included 28 consented care partners drawn from a sample of 455 dyads enrolled in the Fam-FFC intervention. An interview guide was created based on the EVM. Participants provided demographic data. Thematic analysis was conducted to analyze transcribed interviews. The majority of the sample was female (79%), Non-Hispanic (96%) and half were married. One-half of the sample represented Black care partners and one-half were White. Seventy-nine percent lived with their family member with ADRD. Three major themes were identified from the thematic analysis including Care Partner Identity, Care Partner Preferences, and Goals of Care for functional recovery of their family member living with dementia. In this study care partners wanted more social services as well as home care that supported not just physical needs but also social and recreational needs. Findings from the study offer guidance on improving the Fam-FFC intervention including strengthening education and resources on partner self-care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"7-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012231206288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Family-centered Function Focused Care (Fam-FFC) intervention, is a nurse-family care partnership model aimed to improve the physical and cognitive recovery in hospitalized persons living with Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (ADRD) while improving the care partner's experiences. Discussions of patients' needs and preferences between nurses and the patient's close family members have been found to be useful in preventing excessive stress in persons with dementia, while lessening the anxiety of care partners. However, the efficacy of dementia-specific interventions is influenced in part by the degree to which the interventions are flexible and sensitive to the patient's and care-partner's condition, needs, and preferences, including cultural preferences. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the cultural appropriateness of Fam-FFC using the Ecological Validity Model (EVM). This qualitative, descriptive study included 28 consented care partners drawn from a sample of 455 dyads enrolled in the Fam-FFC intervention. An interview guide was created based on the EVM. Participants provided demographic data. Thematic analysis was conducted to analyze transcribed interviews. The majority of the sample was female (79%), Non-Hispanic (96%) and half were married. One-half of the sample represented Black care partners and one-half were White. Seventy-nine percent lived with their family member with ADRD. Three major themes were identified from the thematic analysis including Care Partner Identity, Care Partner Preferences, and Goals of Care for functional recovery of their family member living with dementia. In this study care partners wanted more social services as well as home care that supported not just physical needs but also social and recreational needs. Findings from the study offer guidance on improving the Fam-FFC intervention including strengthening education and resources on partner self-care.

探讨以家庭为中心的功能性护理干预的文化适宜性。
以家庭为中心的以功能为中心的护理(Fam-FFC)干预是一种护士-家庭护理伙伴关系模式,旨在改善阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆症(ADRD)住院患者的身体和认知恢复,同时改善护理伙伴的体验。研究发现,护士和患者亲密家庭成员之间对患者需求和偏好的讨论有助于预防痴呆症患者的过度压力,同时减轻护理伙伴的焦虑。然而,针对痴呆症的干预措施的疗效在一定程度上受到干预措施对患者和护理伙伴的状况、需求和偏好(包括文化偏好)的灵活性和敏感性的影响。因此,本研究的目的是使用生态有效性模型(EVM)来评估Fam FFC的文化适宜性。这项定性描述性研究包括28名同意的护理伙伴,他们来自参与Fam FFC干预的455对二人组样本。根据EVM编制了面试指南。参与者提供了人口统计数据。对转录的访谈进行了主题分析。大多数样本是女性(79%),非西班牙裔(96%),一半已婚。一半的样本代表黑人护理伙伴,一半是白人。79%的患者与患有ADRD的家庭成员生活在一起。主题分析确定了三个主要主题,包括护理伙伴身份、护理伙伴偏好和痴呆症家庭成员功能恢复的护理目标。在这项研究中,护理伙伴想要更多的社会服务和家庭护理,不仅支持身体需求,还支持社交和娱乐需求。研究结果为改进Fam FFC干预提供了指导,包括加强伴侣自我护理的教育和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信