Associations Between Buprenorphine\Naloxone and Methadone Treatment and non-Opioid Substance Use in Prescription-Type Opioid Use Disorder: Secondary Analyses From the OPTIMA Study: Associations entre le traitement avec la buprénorphine/naloxone et avec la méthadone et l'utilisation de substances non opioïdes dans le trouble lié à l'usage d'opioïdes de type sur ordonnance : analyses secondaires de l'étude OPTIMA.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1177/07067437231210796
Hamzah Bakouni, Heidar Sharafi, Sarah Drouin, Raphaelle Fortin, Stéphanie Marsan, Suzanne Brissette, Maria Eugenia Socias, Bernard Le Foll, Ron Lim, Didier Jutras-Aswad
{"title":"Associations Between Buprenorphine\\Naloxone and Methadone Treatment and non-Opioid Substance Use in Prescription-Type Opioid Use Disorder: Secondary Analyses From the OPTIMA Study: Associations entre le traitement avec la buprénorphine/naloxone et avec la méthadone et l'utilisation de substances non opioïdes dans le trouble lié à l'usage d'opioïdes de type sur ordonnance : analyses secondaires de l'étude OPTIMA.","authors":"Hamzah Bakouni, Heidar Sharafi, Sarah Drouin, Raphaelle Fortin, Stéphanie Marsan, Suzanne Brissette, Maria Eugenia Socias, Bernard Le Foll, Ron Lim, Didier Jutras-Aswad","doi":"10.1177/07067437231210796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is limited evidence on how opioid agonist treatment (OAT) may affect psychoactive non-opioid substance use in prescription-type opioid use disorder (POUD) and whether this effect might explain OAT outcomes. We aimed to assess the effect of methadone on non-opioid substance use compared to buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NX), to explore whether non-opioid substance use is associated with opioid use and retention in treatment, and to test non-opioid use as a moderator of associations between methadone with retention in OAT and opioid use compared to BUP/NX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of data from the OPTIMA trial, an open-label, pragmatic, parallel, two-arm, pan-Canadian, multicentre, randomized-controlled trial to compare standard methadone model of care and flexible take-home dosing BUP/NX for POUD treatment. We studied the effect of methadone and BUP/NX on non-opioid substance use evaluated by urine drug screen (UDS) and by classes of non-opioid substances (i.e., tetrahydrocannabinol [THC], benzodiazepines, stimulants) (weeks 2-24) using adjusted generalized estimation equation (GEE). We studied the association between non-opioid substance-positive UDS and opioid-positive UDS and retention in treatment, using adjusted GEE and logistic regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, methadone was not associated with non-opioid substance-positive UDS compared to BUP/NX (OR: 0.78; 95%CI, 0.41 to 1.48). When non-opioid substances were studied separately, methadone was associated with lower odds of benzodiazepine-positive UDS (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.98) and THC-positive UDS (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.77), but not with different odds of stimulant-positive UDS (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.78 to 2.16) compared to BUP/NX. Substance-positive UDS, overall and separate classes, were not associated with opioid-positive UDS or retention in treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methadone did not show a significant effect on overall non-opioid substance use in POUD compared to BUP/NX treatment but was associated with lower odds of benzodiazepine and THC use in particular. Non-opioid substance use did not predict OAT outcomes. Further research is needed to ascertain whether specific patterns of polysubstance use (quantity and frequency) may affect treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10924583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437231210796","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There is limited evidence on how opioid agonist treatment (OAT) may affect psychoactive non-opioid substance use in prescription-type opioid use disorder (POUD) and whether this effect might explain OAT outcomes. We aimed to assess the effect of methadone on non-opioid substance use compared to buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NX), to explore whether non-opioid substance use is associated with opioid use and retention in treatment, and to test non-opioid use as a moderator of associations between methadone with retention in OAT and opioid use compared to BUP/NX.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from the OPTIMA trial, an open-label, pragmatic, parallel, two-arm, pan-Canadian, multicentre, randomized-controlled trial to compare standard methadone model of care and flexible take-home dosing BUP/NX for POUD treatment. We studied the effect of methadone and BUP/NX on non-opioid substance use evaluated by urine drug screen (UDS) and by classes of non-opioid substances (i.e., tetrahydrocannabinol [THC], benzodiazepines, stimulants) (weeks 2-24) using adjusted generalized estimation equation (GEE). We studied the association between non-opioid substance-positive UDS and opioid-positive UDS and retention in treatment, using adjusted GEE and logistic regressions.

Results: Overall, methadone was not associated with non-opioid substance-positive UDS compared to BUP/NX (OR: 0.78; 95%CI, 0.41 to 1.48). When non-opioid substances were studied separately, methadone was associated with lower odds of benzodiazepine-positive UDS (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.98) and THC-positive UDS (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.77), but not with different odds of stimulant-positive UDS (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.78 to 2.16) compared to BUP/NX. Substance-positive UDS, overall and separate classes, were not associated with opioid-positive UDS or retention in treatment.

Conclusion: Methadone did not show a significant effect on overall non-opioid substance use in POUD compared to BUP/NX treatment but was associated with lower odds of benzodiazepine and THC use in particular. Non-opioid substance use did not predict OAT outcomes. Further research is needed to ascertain whether specific patterns of polysubstance use (quantity and frequency) may affect treatment outcomes.

处方型阿片类药物使用障碍中丁丙诺啡、纳洛酮和美沙酮治疗与非阿片类物质使用的相关性:来自OPTIMA研究的二次分析。
目的:关于阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)如何影响处方型阿片类药物使用障碍(POUD)中精神活性非阿片类物质的使用,以及这种影响是否可以解释OAT的结果,证据有限。我们旨在评估与丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(BUP/NX)相比,美沙酮对非阿片类药物使用的影响,探讨非阿片性药物使用是否与治疗中的阿片类物质使用和滞留有关,并测试非阿片样药物使用是否是美沙酮与OAT滞留和阿片类药使用之间的调节因素。方法:这是对OPTIMA试验数据的二次分析,OPTIMA试验是一项开放标签、务实、平行、双臂、泛加拿大、多中心随机对照试验,旨在比较标准美沙酮护理模式和灵活的家庭给药BUP/NX治疗POUD。我们研究了美沙酮和BUP/NX对非阿片类药物使用的影响,通过尿液药物筛查(UDS)和使用调整广义估计方程(GEE)的非阿片物质类别(即四氢大麻酚[THC]、苯二氮卓类药物、兴奋剂)(第2-24周)进行评估。我们使用调整后的GEE和logistic回归研究了非阿片类物质阳性UDS和阿片类药物阳性UDS与治疗保留之间的关系。结果:总体而言,与BUP/NX相比,美沙酮与非阿片类物质阳性UDS无关(OR:0.78;95%CI,0.41-1.48)。当单独研究非阿片类物质时,美沙顿与苯二氮卓类药物阳性UDS(OR:0.63;95%CI:0.40-0.98)和四氢大麻酚阳性UDS的几率较低(OR:0.47;95%CI:0.28-0.77)相关,但与BUP/NX相比,刺激物阳性UDS的几率不同(OR:1.29;95%CI:0.78至2.16)。总体和单独类别的物质阳性UDS与阿片类药物阳性UDS或治疗中的滞留无关。结论:与BUP/NX治疗相比,美沙酮对POUD中非阿片类药物的总体使用没有显著影响,但与苯二氮卓类药物和四氢大麻酚使用的几率较低有关。非阿片类药物的使用并不能预测OAT的结果。需要进一步的研究来确定多物质使用的特定模式(数量和频率)是否会影响治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信