Association between rectal diameter and response to treatment with parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and behavioral changes in children and adolescents with bladder and bowel dysfunction.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Noel Charlles Nunes, Glicia Estevam de Abreu, Eneida Regis Dourado, Maria Luiza Veiga, Ananda Nacif, Maria Thaís de Andrade Calasans, Ana Aparecida Nascimento Martinelli Braga, Ubirajara Barroso
{"title":"Association between rectal diameter and response to treatment with parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and behavioral changes in children and adolescents with bladder and bowel dysfunction.","authors":"Noel Charlles Nunes, Glicia Estevam de Abreu, Eneida Regis Dourado, Maria Luiza Veiga, Ananda Nacif, Maria Thaís de Andrade Calasans, Ana Aparecida Nascimento Martinelli Braga, Ubirajara Barroso","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (TENS) is one of the treatments for children with Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction (BBD). Some studies showed that children with increased Rectal Diameter (RD) have more Functional Constipation (FC). However, RD prediction in maintenance of BBD after treatment was never evaluated. Our aim is to evaluate the association between RD and response to treatment in children and adolescents with BBD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study evaluated patients from 5-17 years old with BBD. Dysfunctional Voiding Scoring System (DVSS), Rome IV criteria, and the Constipation Score were used. RD was measured using abdominal ultrasound before treatment according to the technique established by Klijn et al. and was considered enlarged when >3cm. No laxatives were used during treatment. Descriptive analysis and binary regression were performed and the area under the ROC curve was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty children were included (mean age 8.4±2.8 years, 52.5% male). Before treatment, RD was enlarged in 15 children (37.5%) (mean diameter 3.84±0.6cm), with FC persisting post-treatment in 11/15(73.3%). Those patients also required more laxatives following treatment and had more severe FC. Binary regression showed pretreatment RD to be an independent predictor of the persistence of FC post-treatment (OR=9.56; 95%CI:2.05-44.60). In ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI: 0.49-1.0) and specificity 77.14% (95%CI:0.60-0.90) for rectal diameter >3 cm. The likelihood ratio was 4.38 (95%CI:2.40-8.0) for the persistence of BBD following treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RD appears to be relevant in the evaluation of children with BBD, not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a predictor of treatment outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10947615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Braz J Urol","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (TENS) is one of the treatments for children with Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction (BBD). Some studies showed that children with increased Rectal Diameter (RD) have more Functional Constipation (FC). However, RD prediction in maintenance of BBD after treatment was never evaluated. Our aim is to evaluate the association between RD and response to treatment in children and adolescents with BBD.

Materials and methods: This study evaluated patients from 5-17 years old with BBD. Dysfunctional Voiding Scoring System (DVSS), Rome IV criteria, and the Constipation Score were used. RD was measured using abdominal ultrasound before treatment according to the technique established by Klijn et al. and was considered enlarged when >3cm. No laxatives were used during treatment. Descriptive analysis and binary regression were performed and the area under the ROC curve was calculated.

Results: Forty children were included (mean age 8.4±2.8 years, 52.5% male). Before treatment, RD was enlarged in 15 children (37.5%) (mean diameter 3.84±0.6cm), with FC persisting post-treatment in 11/15(73.3%). Those patients also required more laxatives following treatment and had more severe FC. Binary regression showed pretreatment RD to be an independent predictor of the persistence of FC post-treatment (OR=9.56; 95%CI:2.05-44.60). In ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI: 0.49-1.0) and specificity 77.14% (95%CI:0.60-0.90) for rectal diameter >3 cm. The likelihood ratio was 4.38 (95%CI:2.40-8.0) for the persistence of BBD following treatment.

Conclusion: RD appears to be relevant in the evaluation of children with BBD, not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a predictor of treatment outcome.

患有膀胱和肠功能障碍的儿童和青少年的直肠直径与经肢端旁电神经刺激治疗反应和行为变化之间的关系。
目的:肢端旁经皮电刺激(TENS)是治疗儿童膀胱和肠道功能障碍(BBD)的方法之一。一些研究表明,直肠直径(RD)增加的儿童有更多的功能性便秘(FC)。然而,从未对治疗后维持BBD的RD预测进行评估。我们的目的是评估RD与儿童和青少年BBD治疗反应之间的关系。材料和方法:本研究评估了5-17岁的BBD患者。使用功能障碍性排尿评分系统(DVSS)、罗马IV标准和便秘评分。根据Klijn等人建立的技术,在治疗前使用腹部超声测量RD。当>3cm时,认为RD增大。治疗期间未使用泻药。进行描述性分析和二元回归,并计算ROC曲线下的面积。结果:纳入40名儿童(平均年龄8.4±2.8岁,52.5%为男性)。治疗前,15名儿童(37.5%)RD增大(平均直径3.84±0.6cm),治疗后FC持续存在(73.3%)。这些患者在治疗后还需要更多的泻药,FC更严重。二元回归显示,治疗前RD是治疗后FC持续性的独立预测因素(OR=9.56;95%CI:2.05-44.60)。在ROC曲线分析中,直肠直径>3cm的敏感性为100%(95%CI:0.49-1.0),特异性为77.14%(95%CI:0.60-0.90)。治疗后BBD持续性的似然比为4.38(95%CI:2.40-8.0)。结论:RD似乎与儿童BBD的评估相关,不仅是一种诊断工具,也是治疗结果的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Braz J Urol
International Braz J Urol UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
21.60%
发文量
246
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信