Factors Associated With Working Caregivers' Well-Being: Comparisons Between Black and White Working Caregivers in the United States.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Maureen E Templeman, Soomi Lee, William E Haley
{"title":"Factors Associated With Working Caregivers' Well-Being: Comparisons Between Black and White Working Caregivers in the United States.","authors":"Maureen E Templeman, Soomi Lee, William E Haley","doi":"10.1177/00914150231208680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated stressors and strains, resources, and well-being among Black working caregivers (BWC) and White working caregivers (WWC) who participated in the Midlife in the United States study (Black: <i>n</i>  =  49, White: <i>n</i>  =  250). Comparisons were made between BWC and WWC for primary caregiving stressors, secondary strains, resources, and well-being, and hierarchical regression models tested associations among these factors. BWC reported less negative work-to-family spillover, more perceived control and religious/spiritual coping, and higher positive affect than WWC, complementing existing evidence of greater resilience among BWC. Secondary strains stemming from the workplace had stronger associations with well-being than primary caregiving stressors, confirming that the workplace deserves greater attention in stress research and interventions for working caregivers. Finally, perceived control, optimism, and family support were important resources for well-being for both BWC and WWC, substantiating their valuable role in interventions for working caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47878,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aging & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":"179-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aging & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150231208680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated stressors and strains, resources, and well-being among Black working caregivers (BWC) and White working caregivers (WWC) who participated in the Midlife in the United States study (Black: n  =  49, White: n  =  250). Comparisons were made between BWC and WWC for primary caregiving stressors, secondary strains, resources, and well-being, and hierarchical regression models tested associations among these factors. BWC reported less negative work-to-family spillover, more perceived control and religious/spiritual coping, and higher positive affect than WWC, complementing existing evidence of greater resilience among BWC. Secondary strains stemming from the workplace had stronger associations with well-being than primary caregiving stressors, confirming that the workplace deserves greater attention in stress research and interventions for working caregivers. Finally, perceived control, optimism, and family support were important resources for well-being for both BWC and WWC, substantiating their valuable role in interventions for working caregivers.

与工作照顾者幸福感相关的因素:美国黑人和白人工作照顾者的比较。
这项研究调查了参与美国中年研究的黑人工作照顾者(BWC)和白人工作照顾者的压力源和压力、资源和幸福感(黑人:  =  49,白色:n  =  250)。对《生物武器公约》和《世界野生动物公约》的主要照顾压力源、次要压力、资源和幸福感进行了比较,分层回归模型测试了这些因素之间的相关性。《生物武器公约》报告称,与《世界大战》相比,《生物武器条约》的负面工作对家庭的溢出作用更少,感知到的控制和宗教/精神应对能力更强,积极影响更高,这补充了《生物武器委员会》更具韧性的现有证据。与主要护理压力源相比,来自工作场所的次要压力源与幸福感的相关性更强,这证实了工作场所在压力研究和对在职护理人员的干预中值得更多关注。最后,感知到的控制、乐观和家庭支持是《生物武器公约》和《WWC》幸福的重要资源,证明了它们在工作照顾者干预中的宝贵作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: These are some of the broad questions with which the International Journal of Aging and Human Development is concerned. Emphasis is upon psychological and social studies of aging and the aged. However, the Journal also publishes research that introduces observations from other fields that illuminate the "human" side of gerontology, or utilizes gerontological observations to illuminate in other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信