Mapuana C K Antonio, Samantha Keaulana, LeShay Keli'iholokai, H Ilima Ho-Lastimosa, Jane J Chung-Do
{"title":"Indigenous Research Methodologies with Kānaka 'Ōiwi to Address Health Inequities: Two Case Studies.","authors":"Mapuana C K Antonio, Samantha Keaulana, LeShay Keli'iholokai, H Ilima Ho-Lastimosa, Jane J Chung-Do","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kānaka 'Ōiwi (Native Hawaiians), the Indigenous Peoples of Hawai'i, have worldviews of health that emphasize the importance of being pono (ie, right and just) and maintaining balance with all our relations. Yet, the literature of health for Native Hawaiians often focuses on the disproportionate health disparities that affect the Native Hawaiian community. The purpose of this paper is to present 2 case studies that integrate Indigenous research methodologies with, for, and by Kānaka 'Ōiwi, moving beyond Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approaches to respond to the health needs identified with, for, and by Native Hawaiian communities. The first case study, Mini Ahupua'a for Lifestyle and Mea'ai through Aquaponics (MALAMA), reports on the processes and outcomes for backyard aquaponics, which started with, for, and by the Waimānalo community and extended to include other Native Hawaiian communities. The second case study, Ke Ola O Ka 'Āina, reports on the development and pilot findings of the 'Āina Connectedness Scale, developed with, for, and by Native Hawaiian communities. Common themes resulting from the processes of these case examples include the importance of establishing relationships, protocols, and procedures for pono research, identifying community-based health priorities and solutions to address health disparities, and \"walking in multiple worlds\" to address the priorities of multiple stakeholders. Public health recommendations and implications, including lessons learned and academic policies that may counter Indigenous research methodologies, are further described.</p>","PeriodicalId":36659,"journal":{"name":"Hawai''i journal of health & social welfare","volume":"82 10 Suppl 1","pages":"5-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hawai''i journal of health & social welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Kānaka 'Ōiwi (Native Hawaiians), the Indigenous Peoples of Hawai'i, have worldviews of health that emphasize the importance of being pono (ie, right and just) and maintaining balance with all our relations. Yet, the literature of health for Native Hawaiians often focuses on the disproportionate health disparities that affect the Native Hawaiian community. The purpose of this paper is to present 2 case studies that integrate Indigenous research methodologies with, for, and by Kānaka 'Ōiwi, moving beyond Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approaches to respond to the health needs identified with, for, and by Native Hawaiian communities. The first case study, Mini Ahupua'a for Lifestyle and Mea'ai through Aquaponics (MALAMA), reports on the processes and outcomes for backyard aquaponics, which started with, for, and by the Waimānalo community and extended to include other Native Hawaiian communities. The second case study, Ke Ola O Ka 'Āina, reports on the development and pilot findings of the 'Āina Connectedness Scale, developed with, for, and by Native Hawaiian communities. Common themes resulting from the processes of these case examples include the importance of establishing relationships, protocols, and procedures for pono research, identifying community-based health priorities and solutions to address health disparities, and "walking in multiple worlds" to address the priorities of multiple stakeholders. Public health recommendations and implications, including lessons learned and academic policies that may counter Indigenous research methodologies, are further described.
夏威夷原住民Kānaka'Ōiwi(夏威夷原住民)的健康世界观强调了成为波诺人(即正确和公正)和与我们所有关系保持平衡的重要性。然而,夏威夷原住民的健康文献往往关注影响夏威夷原住民社区的不成比例的健康差异。本文的目的是介绍2个案例研究,这些案例研究将土著研究方法与Kānaka'Ōiwi相结合,超越了基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)方法,以应对夏威夷土著社区确定的健康需求。第一个案例研究,Mini Ahupua'a for Lifestyle and Mea’ai through Aquaponics(MALAMA),报告了后院水培的过程和结果,该研究始于Waimānalo社区,由其负责,并扩展到包括其他夏威夷原住民社区。第二个案例研究Ke Ola O Ka’256ina报告了与夏威夷原住民社区、为夏威夷原住民社区和由夏威夷原住民社区开发的‘256ina连通性量表的开发和试点结果。这些案例的过程产生的共同主题包括为波诺研究建立关系、协议和程序的重要性,确定基于社区的卫生优先事项和解决方案以解决健康差距,以及“走进多个世界”以解决多个利益相关者的优先事项。进一步描述了公共卫生建议和影响,包括可能对抗土著研究方法的经验教训和学术政策。