A Comparison of Strategies to Increase Household Survey Response Rates in a Predominantly Indigenous Community Population.

Q4 Medicine
Jeanelle J Sugimoto-Matsuda, Jennifer W Kaminski, Earl S Hishinuma, Janice Y Chang, Fa'apisa M Soli, D Michele Hoover, Randy Paul M Bautista
{"title":"A Comparison of Strategies to Increase Household Survey Response Rates in a Predominantly Indigenous Community Population.","authors":"Jeanelle J Sugimoto-Matsuda, Jennifer W Kaminski, Earl S Hishinuma, Janice Y Chang, Fa'apisa M Soli, D Michele Hoover, Randy Paul M Bautista","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study describes 4 strategies for increasing response rates to a community-based survey on youth violence in an ethnically diverse population in Hawai'i. A total of 350 households were mailed a Safe Community Survey using 4 different randomly assigned incentive strategies. The strategies varied by length of survey and timing of incentive for completion (given before completion, after completion, or both). In univariate analyses, there were no significant differences across survey strategies on participant demographics, community perceptions of violence-related behaviors, or percent of missing items. However, in multivariate regressions, respondents' sex and percent of missing items on the surveys were consistently significant predictors across multiple outcomes. Although the use of strategies to increase response rates in community-based surveys might be desirable, resulting data need to be examined for the potential that strategies might recruit different populations, which may have an impact on the data obtained. This study offers lessons and recommendations for surveying Native and Indigenous communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36659,"journal":{"name":"Hawai''i journal of health & social welfare","volume":"82 10 Suppl 1","pages":"51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hawai''i journal of health & social welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study describes 4 strategies for increasing response rates to a community-based survey on youth violence in an ethnically diverse population in Hawai'i. A total of 350 households were mailed a Safe Community Survey using 4 different randomly assigned incentive strategies. The strategies varied by length of survey and timing of incentive for completion (given before completion, after completion, or both). In univariate analyses, there were no significant differences across survey strategies on participant demographics, community perceptions of violence-related behaviors, or percent of missing items. However, in multivariate regressions, respondents' sex and percent of missing items on the surveys were consistently significant predictors across multiple outcomes. Although the use of strategies to increase response rates in community-based surveys might be desirable, resulting data need to be examined for the potential that strategies might recruit different populations, which may have an impact on the data obtained. This study offers lessons and recommendations for surveying Native and Indigenous communities.

在以土著为主的社区人口中提高家庭调查响应率的策略比较。
本研究描述了4项策略,以提高对夏威夷不同种族人口中青年暴力行为的社区调查的响应率。共有350户家庭收到了一份安全社区调查,使用了4种不同的随机分配的激励策略。策略因调查时间长短和完成激励的时间(在完成前、完成后或两者兼有)而异。在单变量分析中,不同调查策略在参与者人口统计、社区对暴力相关行为的看法或缺失项目的百分比方面没有显著差异。然而,在多变量回归中,受访者的性别和调查中遗漏项目的百分比始终是多种结果的重要预测因素。尽管在基于社区的调查中使用提高答复率的策略可能是可取的,但需要审查由此产生的数据,以确定策略可能招募不同人群的可能性,这可能会对所获得的数据产生影响。这项研究为调查土著和土著社区提供了经验教训和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信