Develop and Validate a Risk Score in Predicting Renal Failure in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney Diseases Pub Date : 2023-03-28 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1159/000529773
Yikai Cai, Yunzi Liu, Jun Tong, Yuanmeng Jin, Jian Liu, Xu Hao, Yinhong Ji, Jun Ma, Xiaoxia Pan, Nan Chen, Hong Ren, Jingyuan Xie
{"title":"Develop and Validate a Risk Score in Predicting Renal Failure in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis.","authors":"Yikai Cai,&nbsp;Yunzi Liu,&nbsp;Jun Tong,&nbsp;Yuanmeng Jin,&nbsp;Jian Liu,&nbsp;Xu Hao,&nbsp;Yinhong Ji,&nbsp;Jun Ma,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Pan,&nbsp;Nan Chen,&nbsp;Hong Ren,&nbsp;Jingyuan Xie","doi":"10.1159/000529773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk score (RS) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient with biopsy-proven FSGS was enrolled. All the patients were allocated 1:1 to the two groups according to their baseline gender, age, and baseline creatinine level by using a stratified randomization method. ESKD was the primary endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 359 FSGS patients, and 177 subjects were assigned to group 1 and 182 to group 2. The clinicopathological variables were similar between two groups. There were 23 (13%) subjects reached to ESKD in group 1 and 22 (12.1%) in group 2. By multivariate Cox regression analyses, we established RS 1 and RS 2 in groups 1 and 2, respectively. RS 1 consists of five parameters including lower eGFR, higher urine protein, MAP, IgG level, and tubulointerstitial lesion (TIL) score; RS 2 also consists of five predictors including lower C3, higher MAP, IgG level, hemoglobin, and TIL score. RS 1 and RS 2 were cross-validated between these two groups, showing RS 1 had better performance in predicting 5-year ESKD in group 1 (c statics, 0.86 [0.74-0.98] vs. 0.82 [0.69-0.95]) and group 2 (c statics, 0.91 [0.83-0.99] vs. 0.89 [0.79-0.99]) compared to RS 2. We then stratified the risk factors into four groups, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve revealed that patients progressed to ESKD increased as risk levels increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A predictive model incorporated clinicopathological feature was developed and validated for the prediction of ESKD in FSGS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17830,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Diseases","volume":"9 4","pages":"285-297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk score (RS) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS).

Methods: Patient with biopsy-proven FSGS was enrolled. All the patients were allocated 1:1 to the two groups according to their baseline gender, age, and baseline creatinine level by using a stratified randomization method. ESKD was the primary endpoint.

Results: We recruited 359 FSGS patients, and 177 subjects were assigned to group 1 and 182 to group 2. The clinicopathological variables were similar between two groups. There were 23 (13%) subjects reached to ESKD in group 1 and 22 (12.1%) in group 2. By multivariate Cox regression analyses, we established RS 1 and RS 2 in groups 1 and 2, respectively. RS 1 consists of five parameters including lower eGFR, higher urine protein, MAP, IgG level, and tubulointerstitial lesion (TIL) score; RS 2 also consists of five predictors including lower C3, higher MAP, IgG level, hemoglobin, and TIL score. RS 1 and RS 2 were cross-validated between these two groups, showing RS 1 had better performance in predicting 5-year ESKD in group 1 (c statics, 0.86 [0.74-0.98] vs. 0.82 [0.69-0.95]) and group 2 (c statics, 0.91 [0.83-0.99] vs. 0.89 [0.79-0.99]) compared to RS 2. We then stratified the risk factors into four groups, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve revealed that patients progressed to ESKD increased as risk levels increased.

Conclusions: A predictive model incorporated clinicopathological feature was developed and validated for the prediction of ESKD in FSGS patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

开发和验证预测局灶性节段性肾小球硬化症肾功能衰竭的风险评分。
引言:本研究的目的是开发和验证局灶节段性肾小球硬化症(FSGS)患者终末期肾病(ESKD)的风险评分(RS)。方法:选择经活检证实的FSGS患者。根据基线性别、年龄和基线肌酸酐水平,采用分层随机化方法将所有患者1:1分为两组。ESKD是主要终点。结果:我们招募了359名FSGS患者,177名受试者被分配到第一组,182名被分配到第二组。两组患者的临床病理变量相似。第1组有23名(13%)受试者达到ESKD,第2组有22名(12.1%)受试人达到ESKD。通过多元Cox回归分析,我们分别在第1组和第2组中建立了RS 1和RS 2。RS 1由5个参数组成,包括较低的eGFR、较高的尿蛋白、MAP、IgG水平和肾小管间质病变(TIL)评分;RS 2还包括五个预测因子,包括较低的C3、较高的MAP、IgG水平、血红蛋白和TIL评分。RS 1和RS 2在这两组之间进行了交叉验证,表明与RS 2相比,RS 1在预测5年ESKD方面在第1组(c静力学,0.86[0.74-0.98]对0.82[0.69-0.95])和第2组(c statics,0.91[0.83-0.99]对0.89[0.79-0.99])具有更好的性能。然后,我们将风险因素分为四组,Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,随着风险水平的增加,患者进展为ESKD。结论:建立并验证了一个结合临床病理特征的预测模型,用于预测FSGS患者的ESKD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Diseases
Kidney Diseases UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.70%
发文量
33
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Kidney Diseases'' aims to provide a platform for Asian and Western research to further and support communication and exchange of knowledge. Review articles cover the most recent clinical and basic science relevant to the entire field of nephrological disorders, including glomerular diseases, acute and chronic kidney injury, tubulo-interstitial disease, hypertension and metabolism-related disorders, end-stage renal disease, and genetic kidney disease. Special articles are prepared by two authors, one from East and one from West, which compare genetics, epidemiology, diagnosis methods, and treatment options of a disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信