The Clinical Implementation of CYP2C19 Genotyping in Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the FORCE-ACS Registry.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jaouad Azzahhafi, Wout W A van den Broek, Dean R P P Chan Pin Yin, Ankie M Harmsze, Ron H N van Schaik, Jurriën M Ten Berg
{"title":"The Clinical Implementation of <i>CYP2C19</i> Genotyping in Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the FORCE-ACS Registry.","authors":"Jaouad Azzahhafi, Wout W A van den Broek, Dean R P P Chan Pin Yin, Ankie M Harmsze, Ron H N van Schaik, Jurriën M Ten Berg","doi":"10.1177/10742484231210704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines recommend prasugrel or ticagrelor for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, these P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitors increase bleeding risk compared to clopidogrel. Although genotype-guided P2Y<sub>12</sub>-inhibitor selection has been shown to reduce bleeding risk, data on its clinical implementation is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included ACS patients receiving genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy, utilising either a point-of-care (POC) device or laboratory-based testing. We aimed to collect qualitative and quantitative data on genotyping, eligibility for de-escalation, physician adherence to genotype results, time to de-escalation and cost reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,530 patients included in the ACS registry from 2021 to 2023, 738 ACS patients treated with ticagrelor received a <i>CYP2C19</i> genotype test. The median turnover time of genotyping was 6.3 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 3.2-16.7), with 82.3% of the genotyping results known within 24 hours after admission. POC genotyping exhibited significantly shorter turnaround times compared to laboratory-based testing (with respective medians of 5.7 vs 47.8 hours; <i>P</i> < .001). Of the genotyped patients, 81.7% were eligible for de-escalation which was carried out within 24 hours in 70.9% and within 48 h in 93.0%. The time to de-escalation was significantly shorter using POC (25.4 hours) compared to laboratory-based testing (58.9 hours; <i>P</i> < .001). Implementing this strategy led to a reduction of €211,150.50 in medication costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CYP2C19 genotype-guided-de-escalation in an all-comers ACS population is feasible. POC genotyping leads to shorter turnaround times and quicker de-escalation. Time to de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in noncarriers was short, with high physician adherence to genotype results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"28 ","pages":"10742484231210704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484231210704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend prasugrel or ticagrelor for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, these P2Y12 inhibitors increase bleeding risk compared to clopidogrel. Although genotype-guided P2Y12-inhibitor selection has been shown to reduce bleeding risk, data on its clinical implementation is lacking.

Methods: The study included ACS patients receiving genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy, utilising either a point-of-care (POC) device or laboratory-based testing. We aimed to collect qualitative and quantitative data on genotyping, eligibility for de-escalation, physician adherence to genotype results, time to de-escalation and cost reduction.

Results: Of the 1,530 patients included in the ACS registry from 2021 to 2023, 738 ACS patients treated with ticagrelor received a CYP2C19 genotype test. The median turnover time of genotyping was 6.3 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 3.2-16.7), with 82.3% of the genotyping results known within 24 hours after admission. POC genotyping exhibited significantly shorter turnaround times compared to laboratory-based testing (with respective medians of 5.7 vs 47.8 hours; P < .001). Of the genotyped patients, 81.7% were eligible for de-escalation which was carried out within 24 hours in 70.9% and within 48 h in 93.0%. The time to de-escalation was significantly shorter using POC (25.4 hours) compared to laboratory-based testing (58.9 hours; P < .001). Implementing this strategy led to a reduction of €211,150.50 in medication costs.

Conclusions: CYP2C19 genotype-guided-de-escalation in an all-comers ACS population is feasible. POC genotyping leads to shorter turnaround times and quicker de-escalation. Time to de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in noncarriers was short, with high physician adherence to genotype results.

急性冠状动脉综合征患者CYP2C19基因分型的临床应用:来自FORCE-ACS注册表的见解。
背景:指南推荐普拉格雷或替卡格雷治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者。然而,与氯吡格雷相比,这些P2Y12抑制剂会增加出血风险。尽管基因型引导的P2Y12抑制剂选择已被证明可以降低出血风险,但其临床应用数据尚缺乏。方法:该研究包括接受基因型引导抗血小板治疗的ACS患者,使用护理点(POC)设备或实验室测试。我们旨在收集有关基因分型、降级资格、医生对基因型结果的依从性、降级时间和成本降低的定性和定量数据。结果:在2021年至2023年纳入ACS登记的1530名患者中,738名接受替卡格雷治疗的ACS患者接受了CYP2C19基因型检测。基因分型的中位周转时间为6.3 小时(四分位间距[IQR],3.2-16.7),82.3%的基因分型结果在24小时内已知 入院后数小时。与实验室检测相比,POC基因分型显示出明显更短的周转时间(中位数分别为5.7和47.8 小时;P P 结论:CYP2C19基因型指导下在所有参与者ACS人群中降级是可行的。POC基因分型可缩短周转时间并加快降级速度。非携带者从替卡格雷降级为氯吡格雷的时间很短,医生对基因型结果的依从性很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JCPT) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical application to cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. Experimental studies focus on translational research. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信