Association of Physical Frailty and Cognitive Function in a Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study of American Older Adults.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Gerontology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1159/000533919
Shama Karanth, Dejana Braithwaite, Yuriko Katsumata, Ranjan Duara, Paul Norrod, Ikramuddin Aukhil, Erin Abner
{"title":"Association of Physical Frailty and Cognitive Function in a Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study of American Older Adults.","authors":"Shama Karanth, Dejana Braithwaite, Yuriko Katsumata, Ranjan Duara, Paul Norrod, Ikramuddin Aukhil, Erin Abner","doi":"10.1159/000533919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive impairment and frailty are prevalent in older persons. Physical frailty is associated with cognitive decline; however, the role of effect modifiers such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, and cognitive reserve is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2014) were obtained for participants aged ≥60 years. Complete availability of cognitive scores was an inclusion criterion. Physical frailty was defined by the presence of exhaustion, weakness, low body mass, and/or low physical activity, and categorized into three groups: robust (0 present), pre-frail (1-2 present), or frail (3-4 present). Four cognitive test scores were converted to z-scores, and global cognition (composite z-score) was calculated by averaging the four-individual z-scores. Multivariable linear regression models were fit to estimate the associations between frailty and cognitive function. Frailty was also evaluated as a risk factor for self-reported subjective memory complaint (SMC) using logistic regression. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, alcohol use, income, marital status, diabetes, hypertension, and history of stroke. Effect measure modification analyses were conducted by age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and occupational cognitive demand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population comprised 2,863 participants aged ≥60 years. 50.6% of the participants were categorized into robust, 43.2% pre-frail, and 6.2% frail. After adjusting for covariates, compared to robust participants, frail and prefrail participants had lower adjusted mean global cognitive z-scores, <inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m1\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = -0.61, 95% CI: -0.83, -0.38 and <inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m2\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = -0.21, 95% CI: -0.30, -0.12, respectively. Both prefrail and frail participants had higher odds of SMC compared to the robust participants. We did not see strong evidence that the association between frailty and cognition was modified by the factors we studied.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Both pre-frailty and frailty were associated with lower cognitive performance and were more likely to report subjective memory complaints relative to persons without frailty. These findings provide additional evidence that physical frailty may serve as a prognostic factor for cognitive deterioration or dementia, and prevention of frailty may be an important public health strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"48-58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive impairment and frailty are prevalent in older persons. Physical frailty is associated with cognitive decline; however, the role of effect modifiers such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, and cognitive reserve is not well understood.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2014) were obtained for participants aged ≥60 years. Complete availability of cognitive scores was an inclusion criterion. Physical frailty was defined by the presence of exhaustion, weakness, low body mass, and/or low physical activity, and categorized into three groups: robust (0 present), pre-frail (1-2 present), or frail (3-4 present). Four cognitive test scores were converted to z-scores, and global cognition (composite z-score) was calculated by averaging the four-individual z-scores. Multivariable linear regression models were fit to estimate the associations between frailty and cognitive function. Frailty was also evaluated as a risk factor for self-reported subjective memory complaint (SMC) using logistic regression. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, alcohol use, income, marital status, diabetes, hypertension, and history of stroke. Effect measure modification analyses were conducted by age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and occupational cognitive demand.

Results: The study population comprised 2,863 participants aged ≥60 years. 50.6% of the participants were categorized into robust, 43.2% pre-frail, and 6.2% frail. After adjusting for covariates, compared to robust participants, frail and prefrail participants had lower adjusted mean global cognitive z-scores, β^ = -0.61, 95% CI: -0.83, -0.38 and β^ = -0.21, 95% CI: -0.30, -0.12, respectively. Both prefrail and frail participants had higher odds of SMC compared to the robust participants. We did not see strong evidence that the association between frailty and cognition was modified by the factors we studied.

Discussion/conclusion: Both pre-frailty and frailty were associated with lower cognitive performance and were more likely to report subjective memory complaints relative to persons without frailty. These findings provide additional evidence that physical frailty may serve as a prognostic factor for cognitive deterioration or dementia, and prevention of frailty may be an important public health strategy.

一项基于人群的美国老年人横断面研究中身体虚弱与认知功能的相关性。
引言:老年人普遍存在认知障碍和虚弱。身体虚弱与认知能力下降有关;然而,诸如年龄、性别、种族/民族和认知储备等效应修饰因子的作用还没有得到很好的理解。方法:从国家健康和营养检查调查(2011-2014)中获得年龄≥60岁的参与者的横断面数据。认知评分的完全可用性是一个纳入标准。身体虚弱由疲惫、虚弱、低体重和/或低体力活动的存在来定义,并分为三组:强壮(0存在)、前期虚弱(1-2存在)或虚弱(3-4存在)。将四个认知测试分数转换为z分数,并通过对四个个体z分数取平均值来计算全局认知(综合z分数)。多元线性回归模型适用于评估虚弱与认知功能之间的关系。虚弱也被评估为自我报告记忆抱怨(SMC)的风险因素使用逻辑回归。所有模型都根据年龄、性别、种族/民族、教育、饮酒、收入、婚姻状况、糖尿病、高血压和中风史进行了调整。根据年龄、性别、种族/民族、教育程度和职业认知需求进行效果测量修正分析。结果:研究人群包括2863名年龄≥60岁的参与者。大约有一半的参与者被分为健壮型(50.6%)、前期虚弱型(43.2%)和虚弱型(6.2%)。在调整协变量后,与强壮的参与者相比,虚弱和飞行前的参与者调整后的平均全局认知z评分较低,分别为β=-0.61,95%CI:0.83,-0.38和β=-0.21,95%CI:0.30,-0.12。与强壮的参与者相比,运动前和虚弱的参与者患SMC的几率都更高。我们没有看到强有力的证据表明,我们研究的因素改变了虚弱和认知之间的联系。讨论/结论:与没有虚弱的人相比,前期虚弱和虚弱都与较低的认知表现有关,并且更有可能报告主观记忆抱怨。这些发现提供了额外的证据,表明身体虚弱可能是认知退化或痴呆的预后因素,预防虚弱可能是一项重要的公共卫生策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontology
Gerontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信