Regulatory Qualification of a Cross-Disease Digital Measure: Benefits and Challenges from the Perspective of IMI Consortium IDEA-FAST.

Q1 Computer Science
Digital Biomarkers Pub Date : 2023-09-19 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000533189
David Nobbs, Wojciech Piwko, Christopher Bull, Francesca Cormack, Teemu Ahmaniemi, Sebastian C Holst, Meenakshi Chatterjee, Walter Maetzler, Stefan Avey, Wan Fai Ng
{"title":"Regulatory Qualification of a Cross-Disease Digital Measure: Benefits and Challenges from the Perspective of IMI Consortium IDEA-FAST.","authors":"David Nobbs, Wojciech Piwko, Christopher Bull, Francesca Cormack, Teemu Ahmaniemi, Sebastian C Holst, Meenakshi Chatterjee, Walter Maetzler, Stefan Avey, Wan Fai Ng","doi":"10.1159/000533189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) consortium IDEA-FAST is developing novel digital measures of fatigue, sleep quality, and impact of sleep disturbances for neurodegenerative diseases and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. In 2022, the consortium met with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to receive advice on its plans for regulatory qualification of the measures. This viewpoint reviews the IDEA-FAST perspective on developing digital measures for multiple diseases and the advice provided by the EMA.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The EMA considered a cross-disease measure an interesting and arguably feasible concept. Developers should account for the need for a strong rationale that the clinical features to be measured are similar across diseases. In addition, they may expect increased complexity of study design, challenges when managing differences within and between disease populations, and the need for validation in both heterogeneous and homogeneous populations.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>EMA highlighted the challenges teams may encounter when developing a cross-disease measure, though benefits potentially include reduced resources for the technology developer and health authority, faster access to innovation across different therapeutic fields, and feasibility of cross-disease comparisons. The insights included here can be used by project teams to guide them in the development of cross-disease digital measures intended for regulatory qualification.</p>","PeriodicalId":11242,"journal":{"name":"Digital Biomarkers","volume":"7 1","pages":"132-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) consortium IDEA-FAST is developing novel digital measures of fatigue, sleep quality, and impact of sleep disturbances for neurodegenerative diseases and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. In 2022, the consortium met with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to receive advice on its plans for regulatory qualification of the measures. This viewpoint reviews the IDEA-FAST perspective on developing digital measures for multiple diseases and the advice provided by the EMA.

Summary: The EMA considered a cross-disease measure an interesting and arguably feasible concept. Developers should account for the need for a strong rationale that the clinical features to be measured are similar across diseases. In addition, they may expect increased complexity of study design, challenges when managing differences within and between disease populations, and the need for validation in both heterogeneous and homogeneous populations.

Key messages: EMA highlighted the challenges teams may encounter when developing a cross-disease measure, though benefits potentially include reduced resources for the technology developer and health authority, faster access to innovation across different therapeutic fields, and feasibility of cross-disease comparisons. The insights included here can be used by project teams to guide them in the development of cross-disease digital measures intended for regulatory qualification.

Abstract Image

跨疾病数字测量的监管资格:IMI联盟IDEA-FAST视角下的利益和挑战。
背景:创新药物倡议(IMI)联盟IDEA-FAST正在开发新的疲劳、睡眠质量和睡眠障碍对神经退行性疾病和免疫介导的炎症性疾病影响的数字测量方法。2022年,该财团与欧洲药品管理局(EMA)会面,就其措施的监管资格计划征求意见。这一观点回顾了IDEA-FAST对开发多种疾病的数字测量的观点以及EMA提供的建议。总结:EMA认为跨疾病测量是一个有趣且可行的概念。开发人员应该考虑到需要一个强有力的理由,即要测量的临床特征在不同疾病中是相似的。此外,他们可能预计研究设计的复杂性会增加,在管理疾病人群内部和之间的差异时会遇到挑战,以及需要在异质和同质人群中进行验证。关键信息:EMA强调了团队在制定跨疾病措施时可能遇到的挑战,尽管其好处可能包括减少技术开发人员和卫生当局的资源,更快地获得不同治疗领域的创新,以及跨疾病比较的可行性。项目团队可以使用此处包含的见解来指导他们制定用于监管资格的跨疾病数字措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digital Biomarkers
Digital Biomarkers Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信