An Assessment Rubric for a Resident Training Program in Surgery: A Single-Institution Experience.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Atsushi Okita, Kazunori Tsukuda, Hideo Ino, Ema Mitsui, Nanami Ikeya, Sumiharu Yamamoto, Nobuji Yokoyama, Aubra Bulin
{"title":"An Assessment Rubric for a Resident Training Program in Surgery: A Single-Institution Experience.","authors":"Atsushi Okita,&nbsp;Kazunori Tsukuda,&nbsp;Hideo Ino,&nbsp;Ema Mitsui,&nbsp;Nanami Ikeya,&nbsp;Sumiharu Yamamoto,&nbsp;Nobuji Yokoyama,&nbsp;Aubra Bulin","doi":"10.18926/AMO/65967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using a Collaborative Action Research model, our research team established a one-month clinical resident training program for first- and second-year clinical residents. We created and implemented an assessment rubric to assess the residents' progress toward independent practice in surgery, and thereby, to evaluate the program itself. The program included training in three areas: basic techniques and procedures in the operating room, surgical ward management, and academic activities. The rubric measured the residents' performance according to three achievement levels: Level 1 (demonstration), Level 2 (active help) and Level 3 (passive help). The program and rubric implementation began in June 2019 and continued until March 2020, when the program outcomes and shortcomings were analyzed. Among nineteen clinical residents, a total of nine clinical residents participated in the study. Most participants reached achievement Level 3 for their performance of basic techniques in the operating room. Finally, we discussed ideas for improvement and drafted plans for an improved rubric to complete the action research cycle. Our research team found the rubric to be a useful tool in evaluating the status of the new clinical resident training program.</p>","PeriodicalId":7017,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Okayama","volume":"77 5","pages":"451-460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Okayama","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/65967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a Collaborative Action Research model, our research team established a one-month clinical resident training program for first- and second-year clinical residents. We created and implemented an assessment rubric to assess the residents' progress toward independent practice in surgery, and thereby, to evaluate the program itself. The program included training in three areas: basic techniques and procedures in the operating room, surgical ward management, and academic activities. The rubric measured the residents' performance according to three achievement levels: Level 1 (demonstration), Level 2 (active help) and Level 3 (passive help). The program and rubric implementation began in June 2019 and continued until March 2020, when the program outcomes and shortcomings were analyzed. Among nineteen clinical residents, a total of nine clinical residents participated in the study. Most participants reached achievement Level 3 for their performance of basic techniques in the operating room. Finally, we discussed ideas for improvement and drafted plans for an improved rubric to complete the action research cycle. Our research team found the rubric to be a useful tool in evaluating the status of the new clinical resident training program.

外科住院医师培训项目的评估准则:单一机构的经验。
使用合作行动研究模式,我们的研究团队为一年级和二年级临床住院医师制定了一个为期一个月的临床住院医师培训计划。我们创建并实施了一个评估准则,以评估住院医师在独立手术方面的进展,从而评估该项目本身。该项目包括三个领域的培训:手术室的基本技术和程序、外科病房管理和学术活动。该量表根据三个成就水平来衡量居民的表现:一级(示范)、二级(主动帮助)和三级(被动帮助)。该计划和准则的实施始于2019年6月,一直持续到2020年3月,当时对计划结果和不足进行了分析。在19名临床住院医师中,共有9名临床住院医生参与了这项研究。大多数参与者在手术室的基本技术表现达到了成绩3级。最后,我们讨论了改进的想法,并起草了改进准则的计划,以完成行动研究周期。我们的研究团队发现,在评估新的临床住院医师培训计划的状态时,该准则是一个有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta medica Okayama
Acta medica Okayama 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Okayama (AMO) publishes papers relating to all areas of basic and clinical medical science. Papers may be submitted by those not affiliated with Okayama University. Only original papers which have not been published or submitted elsewhere and timely review articles should be submitted. Original papers may be Full-length Articles or Short Communications. Case Reports are considered if they describe significant and substantial new findings. Preliminary observations are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信