Mobility of antipyretic drugs with different molecular structures in saturated soil porous media†

IF 4.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jiuyan Chen, Qiang Zhang, Weifeng Chen, Usman Farooq, Taotao Lu, Bin Wang, Jinzhi Ni, Huiying Zhang and Zhichong Qi
{"title":"Mobility of antipyretic drugs with different molecular structures in saturated soil porous media†","authors":"Jiuyan Chen, Qiang Zhang, Weifeng Chen, Usman Farooq, Taotao Lu, Bin Wang, Jinzhi Ni, Huiying Zhang and Zhichong Qi","doi":"10.1039/D3EM00358B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In the post-COVID-19 era, extensive quantities of antipyretic drugs are being haphazardly released from households into the environment, which may pose potential risks to ecological systems and human health. Identification of the mobility behaviors of these compounds in the subsurface environment is crucial to understand the environmental fate of these common contaminants. The mobility properties of three broad-spectrum antipyretic drugs, including ibuprofen (IBF), indometacin (IMC), and acetaminophen (APAP), in porous soil media, were investigated in this study. The results showed that the mobility of the three drugs (the background electrolyte was Na<small><sup>+</sup></small>) through the soil column followed the order of APAP &gt; IBF &gt; IMC. The difference in the physicochemical characteristics of various antipyretic drugs (<em>e.g.</em>, the molecular structure and hydrophobicity) could explain this trend. Unlike Na<small><sup>+</sup></small>, Ca<small><sup>2+</sup></small> ions tended to serve as bridging agents by linking the soil grains and antipyretic molecules, leading to the relatively weak mobility behaviors of antipyretic drugs. Furthermore, for a given antipyretic drug, the antipyretic mobility was promoted when the background solution pH values were raised from 5.0 to 9.0. The phenomenon stemmed from the improved electrostatic repulsion between the dissociated species of antipyretic molecules and soil grains, as well as the weakened hydrophobic interactions between antipyretic drugs and soil organic matter. Furthermore, a two-site non-equilibrium transport model was used to estimate the mobility of antipyretic drugs. The results obtained from this work provide vital information illustrating the transport and retention of various antipyretic drugs in aquifers.</p>","PeriodicalId":74,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts","volume":" 12","pages":" 2092-2101"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/em/d3em00358b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the post-COVID-19 era, extensive quantities of antipyretic drugs are being haphazardly released from households into the environment, which may pose potential risks to ecological systems and human health. Identification of the mobility behaviors of these compounds in the subsurface environment is crucial to understand the environmental fate of these common contaminants. The mobility properties of three broad-spectrum antipyretic drugs, including ibuprofen (IBF), indometacin (IMC), and acetaminophen (APAP), in porous soil media, were investigated in this study. The results showed that the mobility of the three drugs (the background electrolyte was Na+) through the soil column followed the order of APAP > IBF > IMC. The difference in the physicochemical characteristics of various antipyretic drugs (e.g., the molecular structure and hydrophobicity) could explain this trend. Unlike Na+, Ca2+ ions tended to serve as bridging agents by linking the soil grains and antipyretic molecules, leading to the relatively weak mobility behaviors of antipyretic drugs. Furthermore, for a given antipyretic drug, the antipyretic mobility was promoted when the background solution pH values were raised from 5.0 to 9.0. The phenomenon stemmed from the improved electrostatic repulsion between the dissociated species of antipyretic molecules and soil grains, as well as the weakened hydrophobic interactions between antipyretic drugs and soil organic matter. Furthermore, a two-site non-equilibrium transport model was used to estimate the mobility of antipyretic drugs. The results obtained from this work provide vital information illustrating the transport and retention of various antipyretic drugs in aquifers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同分子结构的退烧药在饱和土壤多孔介质中的流动性。
在后COVID-19时代,大量的退烧药正从家庭随意释放到环境中,这可能会对生态系统和人类健康构成潜在风险。识别这些化合物在地下环境中的迁移行为对于了解这些常见污染物的环境命运至关重要。研究了布洛芬(IBF)、吲哚美辛(IMC)和对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)三种广谱解热药物在多孔土壤介质中的流动性。结果表明,三种药物(背景电解质为Na+)在土柱中的迁移率依次为APAP>IBF>IMC。各种解热药物的物理化学特性(如分子结构和疏水性)的差异可以解释这一趋势。与Na+不同,Ca2+离子倾向于通过连接土壤颗粒和解热分子来充当桥接剂,导致解热药物的流动性相对较弱。此外,对于给定的退热药物,当背景溶液的pH值从5.0提高到9.0时,退热移动性得到提高。这一现象源于退热分子的解离物种与土壤颗粒之间的静电斥力增强,以及退热药物与土壤有机物之间的疏水相互作用减弱。此外,还使用了一个双位点非平衡转运模型来估计退热药物的流动性。从这项工作中获得的结果提供了重要信息,说明了各种解热药物在含水层中的运输和滞留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
202
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts publishes high quality papers in all areas of the environmental chemical sciences, including chemistry of the air, water, soil and sediment. We welcome studies on the environmental fate and effects of anthropogenic and naturally occurring contaminants, both chemical and microbiological, as well as related natural element cycling processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信