How does selection operate on whole-organism functional performance capacities? A review and synthesis

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
D. Irschick, J. Meyers, J. Husak, J. Galliard
{"title":"How does selection operate on whole-organism functional performance capacities? A review and synthesis","authors":"D. Irschick, J. Meyers, J. Husak, J. Galliard","doi":"10.7275/R58G8HX6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypothesis: Natural and sexual selection should be stronger on whole-organism functional performance traits (sprinting, biting) than on correlated morphological variables. Organisms: Lizards, snakes, turtles, frogs, and fish (review of past field and laboratory studies). Field sites: Various (review of past field and laboratory studies). Methods: We reviewed existing literature on the nature and intensity of natural and sexual selection on whole-organism performance traits. We answer some key questions in regards to how selection operates on performance, and whether selection is stronger on performance compared with morphological traits. Results: We identified 23 studies that have quantified selection on performance. Natural and sexual selection were typically directional in nature, with a distinct preference for high rather than low values of performance. However, some studies uncovered no significant selection on performance, and there was also no evidence that selection was stronger on performance traits than morphological traits.","PeriodicalId":50469,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Ecology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"354","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Ecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7275/R58G8HX6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 354

Abstract

Hypothesis: Natural and sexual selection should be stronger on whole-organism functional performance traits (sprinting, biting) than on correlated morphological variables. Organisms: Lizards, snakes, turtles, frogs, and fish (review of past field and laboratory studies). Field sites: Various (review of past field and laboratory studies). Methods: We reviewed existing literature on the nature and intensity of natural and sexual selection on whole-organism performance traits. We answer some key questions in regards to how selection operates on performance, and whether selection is stronger on performance compared with morphological traits. Results: We identified 23 studies that have quantified selection on performance. Natural and sexual selection were typically directional in nature, with a distinct preference for high rather than low values of performance. However, some studies uncovered no significant selection on performance, and there was also no evidence that selection was stronger on performance traits than morphological traits.
选择是如何作用于整个生物体的功能表现能力的?综述与综合
假设:自然选择和性选择应该更倾向于整个生物体的功能表现特征(短跑、咬),而不是相关的形态变量。生物:蜥蜴、蛇、海龟、青蛙和鱼(回顾过去的野外和实验室研究)。现场地点:各种(回顾过去的现场和实验室研究)。方法:对现有文献进行了综述,介绍了生物性能性状的自然选择和性选择的性质和强度。我们回答了一些关于选择如何影响性能的关键问题,以及与形态特征相比,选择对性能的影响是否更大。结果:我们确定了23项量化绩效选择的研究。自然选择和性选择在本质上是典型的定向选择,具有明显的偏好高而不是低价值的表现。然而,一些研究并未发现表现上的显著选择,也没有证据表明表现性状的选择强于形态性状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolutionary Ecology Research
Evolutionary Ecology Research 生物-进化生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Ecology Research publishes original research contributions focusing on the overlap between ecology and evolution. Papers may treat any taxon or be general. They may be empirical, theoretical or a combination of the two. EER prefers conceptual contributions that take intellectual risks or that test ideas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信