National Preparedness Planning: The Historical Context and Current State of the U.S. Public's Readiness, 1940-2005

I. Redlener, D. Berman
{"title":"National Preparedness Planning: The Historical Context and Current State of the U.S. Public's Readiness, 1940-2005","authors":"I. Redlener, D. Berman","doi":"10.7916/D8KP8BVK","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n the United States, national public preparedness efforts meant to ready individuals and families for disasters have been driven primarily by international threats, actual or anticipated. These include terrorism, war and the potential for global instability such as the millennium Y2K computer error. The national dialogue on public preparedness following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in the fall of 2005 is a notable departure from the more typical focus of public preparedness, which is oriented toward terrorism and international threats. However, the response to the hurricanes was largely viewed as an unanticipated test of the public’s readiness for a disaster and the penetration of the public preparedness messages that have been actively promulgated since 11 September 2001. As such, we argue that the poor state of public readiness that was found in the U.S. Gulf Coast region after the hurricanes actually reflects a national state of unpreparedness for emergency events despite the postSeptember 11th calls from all levels of government for the U.S. public to be prepared.1 Since 11 September 2001, a renewed national focus on the U.S. public’s readiness for international aggression emerged. This focus was heightened by the anthrax mailings shortly after September 11th and the alleged threat of an Iraqi attack using unconventional weapons, specifically smallpox, on the U.S. homeland. The postSeptember 11th focus on national public preparedness came almost two years after calls had ended for the public to prepare for the millennium Y2K computer error and its potential to disrupt everything from alarm clocks to the power supply. Prior to the millennium, the national public had engaged in a preparedness dialogue born during the Second World War amid calls for the public to engage in air raid and naval watches that continued throughout the Cold War and its threat of nuclear attacks. The post-September 11th national public preparedness dialogue reignited a","PeriodicalId":81668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of international affairs","volume":"59 1","pages":"87-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of international affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8KP8BVK","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

n the United States, national public preparedness efforts meant to ready individuals and families for disasters have been driven primarily by international threats, actual or anticipated. These include terrorism, war and the potential for global instability such as the millennium Y2K computer error. The national dialogue on public preparedness following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in the fall of 2005 is a notable departure from the more typical focus of public preparedness, which is oriented toward terrorism and international threats. However, the response to the hurricanes was largely viewed as an unanticipated test of the public’s readiness for a disaster and the penetration of the public preparedness messages that have been actively promulgated since 11 September 2001. As such, we argue that the poor state of public readiness that was found in the U.S. Gulf Coast region after the hurricanes actually reflects a national state of unpreparedness for emergency events despite the postSeptember 11th calls from all levels of government for the U.S. public to be prepared.1 Since 11 September 2001, a renewed national focus on the U.S. public’s readiness for international aggression emerged. This focus was heightened by the anthrax mailings shortly after September 11th and the alleged threat of an Iraqi attack using unconventional weapons, specifically smallpox, on the U.S. homeland. The postSeptember 11th focus on national public preparedness came almost two years after calls had ended for the public to prepare for the millennium Y2K computer error and its potential to disrupt everything from alarm clocks to the power supply. Prior to the millennium, the national public had engaged in a preparedness dialogue born during the Second World War amid calls for the public to engage in air raid and naval watches that continued throughout the Cold War and its threat of nuclear attacks. The post-September 11th national public preparedness dialogue reignited a
国家准备计划:1940-2005年美国公众准备的历史背景和现状
在美国,旨在使个人和家庭为灾害做好准备的国家公共准备工作主要是由实际或预期的国际威胁推动的。这些威胁包括恐怖主义、战争,以及千年虫电脑错误等潜在的全球不稳定因素。2005年秋季卡特里娜飓风和丽塔飓风之后的全国公共准备对话明显偏离了针对恐怖主义和国际威胁的更典型的公共准备重点。然而,对飓风的反应在很大程度上被视为对公众对灾难的准备程度和自2001年9月11日以来积极传播的公众备灾信息的渗透程度的意外考验。因此,我们认为,飓风过后,美国墨西哥湾沿岸地区的公众准备状况不佳,实际上反映了一个国家对紧急事件准备不足的状态,尽管9·11事件后各级政府都呼吁美国公众做好准备自2001年9月11日以来,全国重新关注美国公众对国际侵略的准备情况。911事件后不久,炭疽邮件的出现,以及据称伊拉克可能使用非常规武器,特别是天花,对美国本土发动袭击的威胁,加剧了这种关注。911事件发生后,人们开始关注全国公众的准备工作,而近两年前,呼吁公众做好应对千年虫电脑错误的准备,以及它可能中断从闹钟到电力供应等一切的呼吁已经结束。在千禧年之前,全国公众参与了一场始于第二次世界大战的准备对话,呼吁公众参与整个冷战时期持续的空袭和海军监视,以及核攻击的威胁。911事件后的全国公共准备对话再次引发了一场讨论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信