{"title":"Animate, inanimate and beyond in Švankmajer's Faust (1994)","authors":"Laura Pontieri","doi":"10.5817/TY2019-S-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jan Švankmajer’s films are not meant to be simply watched but they are created to be intensely experienced – they inescapably provide a powerful feeling of disorientation. Not only are reality, performance, memory and fantasy intersected, but the inhabitants of these “realities” switch from human beings, to objects, puppets, and fantastic figures made by a mixture of all the above. The space in which these characters move is a transitional space, a meeting point of oneiric reality, natural reality, and fictional reality, in which theatricality is often underlined. In this contribution, I would like to suggest that a semiotic approach along the line of the heritage of the Prague school could help to understand the audience’s peculiar reactions to Švankmajer’s continuous crossing of boundaries. Once we approach Švankmajer’s works from a semiotic point of view, we realize how freely he switches from one set of signs to another, dwelling specifically on the space between these systems, exploring, as a faithful surrealist, “the conjunctions, the points of contact, between different realms of existence” (RICHARDSON 2006: 3). The effect is one of bewilderment and unsettlement that ranges from comic to dread. In order to investigate how Švankmajer provokes these various reactions from his spectators, I would like to borrow some insights from the scholars of the Prague school about the distinctive quality of the sets of signs that shape each kind of performing art and provide as an example Švankmajer’s film Faust (Lekce Faust, 1994).","PeriodicalId":37223,"journal":{"name":"Theatralia","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theatralia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/TY2019-S-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Jan Švankmajer’s films are not meant to be simply watched but they are created to be intensely experienced – they inescapably provide a powerful feeling of disorientation. Not only are reality, performance, memory and fantasy intersected, but the inhabitants of these “realities” switch from human beings, to objects, puppets, and fantastic figures made by a mixture of all the above. The space in which these characters move is a transitional space, a meeting point of oneiric reality, natural reality, and fictional reality, in which theatricality is often underlined. In this contribution, I would like to suggest that a semiotic approach along the line of the heritage of the Prague school could help to understand the audience’s peculiar reactions to Švankmajer’s continuous crossing of boundaries. Once we approach Švankmajer’s works from a semiotic point of view, we realize how freely he switches from one set of signs to another, dwelling specifically on the space between these systems, exploring, as a faithful surrealist, “the conjunctions, the points of contact, between different realms of existence” (RICHARDSON 2006: 3). The effect is one of bewilderment and unsettlement that ranges from comic to dread. In order to investigate how Švankmajer provokes these various reactions from his spectators, I would like to borrow some insights from the scholars of the Prague school about the distinctive quality of the sets of signs that shape each kind of performing art and provide as an example Švankmajer’s film Faust (Lekce Faust, 1994).
Jan Švankmajer的电影不仅仅是为了观看,而是为了强烈的体验——它们不可避免地提供了一种强大的迷失感。不仅现实、表演、记忆和幻想交织在一起,而且这些“现实”的居住者从人类切换到物体、木偶和由上述所有东西混合而成的奇妙人物。这些人物活动的空间是一个过渡空间,是虚拟现实、自然现实和虚构现实的交汇点,在这里,戏剧性经常被强调。在这篇文章中,我想建议一种符号学的方法,沿着布拉格学派的传统,可以帮助理解观众对Švankmajer不断跨越边界的特殊反应。一旦我们从符号学的角度来看Švankmajer的作品,我们就会意识到他是如何自由地从一组符号切换到另一组符号,特别关注这些系统之间的空间,作为一个忠实的超现实主义者,探索“不同存在领域之间的连接,接触点”(理查森2006:3)。其效果是一种困惑和不安,从喜剧到恐惧。为了研究Švankmajer如何引起观众的这些不同反应,我想从布拉格学派的学者那里借用一些关于塑造每种表演艺术的符号集的独特品质的见解,并以Švankmajer的电影《浮士德》(Lekce Faust, 1994)为例。