The Assesment of Permissibility of Using Non-statutory Justifications in Czech and Polish Criminal Law

Q4 Social Sciences
Michał Grudecki
{"title":"The Assesment of Permissibility of Using Non-statutory Justifications in Czech and Polish Criminal Law","authors":"Michał Grudecki","doi":"10.5817/cpvp2022-3-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject-matter of this paper is the acceptability of non-statutory justifications, analysed on the instance of very similar penal law systems of closely related countries, namely the Republic of Poland and the Czech Republic. In both of them, one can observe a phenomenon of invoking circumstances not set forth in any legal act and rendering an action prohibited in the light of judicature. This paper studies whether it is permitted that public authorities invoked such circumstances in a democratic state of law. It is claimed by certain author that by invoking it judicial authorities violate the principles of specificity, separation of powers and legality, being the cornerstones of Polish and Czech law, and, thus, jeopardise the legal security of individuals; moreover, this course of action may be a threat to the legal system. Regardless of the fact that Poland and the Czech Republic are studied here, the considerations may well apply to any other penal law systems based on the formal and material definition of a crime and the above-mentioned principles. The research method in use was that of analysing legal provisions (mainly, basic laws and penal codes) formally and dogmatically.","PeriodicalId":52263,"journal":{"name":"Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cpvp2022-3-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject-matter of this paper is the acceptability of non-statutory justifications, analysed on the instance of very similar penal law systems of closely related countries, namely the Republic of Poland and the Czech Republic. In both of them, one can observe a phenomenon of invoking circumstances not set forth in any legal act and rendering an action prohibited in the light of judicature. This paper studies whether it is permitted that public authorities invoked such circumstances in a democratic state of law. It is claimed by certain author that by invoking it judicial authorities violate the principles of specificity, separation of powers and legality, being the cornerstones of Polish and Czech law, and, thus, jeopardise the legal security of individuals; moreover, this course of action may be a threat to the legal system. Regardless of the fact that Poland and the Czech Republic are studied here, the considerations may well apply to any other penal law systems based on the formal and material definition of a crime and the above-mentioned principles. The research method in use was that of analysing legal provisions (mainly, basic laws and penal codes) formally and dogmatically.
捷克和波兰刑法中非法定事由的可容许性评价
本文的主题是非法定理由的可接受性,并以密切相关国家(即波兰共和国和捷克共和国)非常相似的刑法制度为例进行分析。在这两种情况下,人们都可以观察到一种现象,即援引任何法律行为中没有规定的情况,并根据司法禁止采取行动。本文研究的是,在一个民主法治国家,是否允许公共当局援引这种情况。某些作者声称,司法当局援引这一法律违反了特殊性、三权分立和合法性原则,这些原则是波兰和捷克法律的基石,因此危及个人的法律安全;此外,这种做法可能对法律制度构成威胁。尽管这里研究的是波兰和捷克共和国,但这些考虑完全可以适用于以犯罪的正式和实质定义以及上述原则为基础的任何其他刑法制度。所使用的研究方法是正式和教条式地分析法律规定(主要是基本法律和刑法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi
Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信