Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor: a Comparative Study of Middle-class, Working Married Men and Women in Japan and Indonesia

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jenny Simulja, E. Wulandari, S. Wulansari
{"title":"Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor: a Comparative Study of Middle-class, Working Married Men and Women in Japan and Indonesia","authors":"Jenny Simulja, E. Wulandari, S. Wulansari","doi":"10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seeking to offer a balanced perspective to gender inequality and the division of household labor among middle-class, working married men and women in Japan and Indonesia, this paper examines the effects of individual-level characteristics (relative income, working hours, gender ideology) as well as the country-level factors (e.g. GEM: Gender Empowerment Measure) on the dynamics of housework distribution between spouses in both countries. Statistical analyses show a number of significant correlations between these variables, among which gender ideology seems to be of particular importance. Perhaps the most enlightening finding of all is that despite their lower GEM rank compared to Japan, the Indonesian respondents have relatively egalitarian division of labor in their households. This finding provides a new insight that GEM, which emphasizes the political economy aspects of a country, may not be sufficient to capture gender disparities without considering other socio-cultural factors in the complexity of day-to-day actual division of housework. Keywords: Blumberg’s theory of gender stratification, gender empowerment measure (GEM), Japan-Indonesia, gender inequality, the division of household labor","PeriodicalId":53785,"journal":{"name":"Makara Hubs-Asia","volume":"18 1","pages":"109-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makara Hubs-Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Seeking to offer a balanced perspective to gender inequality and the division of household labor among middle-class, working married men and women in Japan and Indonesia, this paper examines the effects of individual-level characteristics (relative income, working hours, gender ideology) as well as the country-level factors (e.g. GEM: Gender Empowerment Measure) on the dynamics of housework distribution between spouses in both countries. Statistical analyses show a number of significant correlations between these variables, among which gender ideology seems to be of particular importance. Perhaps the most enlightening finding of all is that despite their lower GEM rank compared to Japan, the Indonesian respondents have relatively egalitarian division of labor in their households. This finding provides a new insight that GEM, which emphasizes the political economy aspects of a country, may not be sufficient to capture gender disparities without considering other socio-cultural factors in the complexity of day-to-day actual division of housework. Keywords: Blumberg’s theory of gender stratification, gender empowerment measure (GEM), Japan-Indonesia, gender inequality, the division of household labor
性别不平等与家庭劳动分工:日本和印度尼西亚中产阶级、在职已婚男女的比较研究
为了提供一个平衡的视角来看待日本和印度尼西亚中产阶级、已婚工作男女之间的性别不平等和家务劳动分工,本文考察了个人层面的特征(相对收入、工作时间、性别意识形态)以及国家层面的因素(例如GEM:性别赋权措施)对两国配偶之间家务分配动态的影响。统计分析显示,这些变量之间有许多重要的相互关系,其中性别意识形态似乎特别重要。也许最具启发性的发现是,尽管印尼的创业板排名低于日本,但他们的家庭劳动分工相对平等。这一发现提供了一个新的见解,即GEM强调一个国家的政治经济方面,如果不考虑日常实际家务分工复杂性中的其他社会文化因素,可能不足以捕捉性别差异。关键词:布隆伯格性别分层理论,性别赋权措施,日本-印尼,性别不平等,家庭分工
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Makara Hubs-Asia
Makara Hubs-Asia SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信