{"title":"La apelación en el género discursivo del correo electrónico: fórmulas nominales de tratamiento en las aperturas y los cierres de los mensajes de email","authors":"Cristina Vela Delfa","doi":"10.7764/onomazein.add.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolA partir de un corpus de correos electronicos intercambiados por hablantes de espanol de Espana, en este trabajo nos ocupamos de los mecanismos de apelacion, en particular de las formulas de tratamiento nominales en funcion vocativa en las aperturas y los cierres de los correos electronicos, a traves del analisis de dos de sus valores fundamentales: el deictico y el relacional. Nuestro objetivo es identificar algunas pautas discursivas propias del correo electronico que nos legitimen a caracterizarlo como un genero discursivo independiente (Swales, 1990). En el correo electronico, los valores deicticos de las formulas de tratamiento nominales se desarrollan en un marco de enunciacion definido por el propio paratexto, que explicita las referencias al remitente y destinatario, y en algunas de las aperturas y de los cierres de los mensajes. Asimismo, la deixis social se relaciona con la seleccion de ciertas formulas de tratamiento. En sintesis, a partir del analisis de la apelacion en el correo electronico, este trabajo aborda cuestiones que nos ponen frente a temas centrales en la caracterizacion del estilo electronico y del discurso digital, segun su particular posicionamiento en relacion a la oposicion entre poder y solidaridad (Brown y Gilman, 1960) y autonomia y afiliacion (Bravo, 1999). EnglishFrom a corpus of e-mails exchanged by Spanish speakers in Spain, in this work we deal with forms of address, in particular of the nominal forms of address in vocative function, through the analysis of two of its fundamental values: the deictic and the relational. We will focus mainly on the analysis of the functions of the nominal treatment formulas in the openings and closings of the emails. Our objective is to identify some discursive patterns of e-mail that legitimize us to characterize it as an independent discursive genre (Swales, 1990). In e-mail, the nominal values of nominal address forms are developed within an enunciation framework defined by the paratext itself, which explains the references to the sender and recipient, and in some of the openings and closures of the messages. Furthermore, the study of the social-affective relational values of the nominal forms of address is related to the analysis of the more or less formulaic use of address forms. In summary, based on the analysis of address in the electronic mail, this work addresses issues that put us in front of central themes in the characterization of the electronic style and the digital discourse, according to its particular positioning in relation to the opposition between power and solidarity (Brown and Gilman, 1960) and autonomy and affiliation (Bravo, 1999).","PeriodicalId":44966,"journal":{"name":"Onomazein","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onomazein","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.add.06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
espanolA partir de un corpus de correos electronicos intercambiados por hablantes de espanol de Espana, en este trabajo nos ocupamos de los mecanismos de apelacion, en particular de las formulas de tratamiento nominales en funcion vocativa en las aperturas y los cierres de los correos electronicos, a traves del analisis de dos de sus valores fundamentales: el deictico y el relacional. Nuestro objetivo es identificar algunas pautas discursivas propias del correo electronico que nos legitimen a caracterizarlo como un genero discursivo independiente (Swales, 1990). En el correo electronico, los valores deicticos de las formulas de tratamiento nominales se desarrollan en un marco de enunciacion definido por el propio paratexto, que explicita las referencias al remitente y destinatario, y en algunas de las aperturas y de los cierres de los mensajes. Asimismo, la deixis social se relaciona con la seleccion de ciertas formulas de tratamiento. En sintesis, a partir del analisis de la apelacion en el correo electronico, este trabajo aborda cuestiones que nos ponen frente a temas centrales en la caracterizacion del estilo electronico y del discurso digital, segun su particular posicionamiento en relacion a la oposicion entre poder y solidaridad (Brown y Gilman, 1960) y autonomia y afiliacion (Bravo, 1999). EnglishFrom a corpus of e-mails exchanged by Spanish speakers in Spain, in this work we deal with forms of address, in particular of the nominal forms of address in vocative function, through the analysis of two of its fundamental values: the deictic and the relational. We will focus mainly on the analysis of the functions of the nominal treatment formulas in the openings and closings of the emails. Our objective is to identify some discursive patterns of e-mail that legitimize us to characterize it as an independent discursive genre (Swales, 1990). In e-mail, the nominal values of nominal address forms are developed within an enunciation framework defined by the paratext itself, which explains the references to the sender and recipient, and in some of the openings and closures of the messages. Furthermore, the study of the social-affective relational values of the nominal forms of address is related to the analysis of the more or less formulaic use of address forms. In summary, based on the analysis of address in the electronic mail, this work addresses issues that put us in front of central themes in the characterization of the electronic style and the digital discourse, according to its particular positioning in relation to the opposition between power and solidarity (Brown and Gilman, 1960) and autonomy and affiliation (Bravo, 1999).