Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of frontal recess cells according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) - difficulties in identification of frontal recess cells in patients with diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis?

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Weronika Jaremek-Ochniak, J. Sierdziński, Mariola Popko-Zagor
{"title":"Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of frontal recess cells according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) - difficulties in identification of frontal recess cells in patients with diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis?","authors":"Weronika Jaremek-Ochniak, J. Sierdziński, Mariola Popko-Zagor","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.6959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) is a consensus document created to standardize and specify the naming of cells within the region of the frontal recess and frontal sinus. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the difficulties in identifying cells according to the IFAC in patients with diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis. Material and methods: Three independent reviewers examined triplanar computed tomography (CT) scans to assess the anatomy of the frontal recess using the IFAC system. CT scans were chosen randomly and divided into 3 groups: CT scans of patients not presenting sinus complaints (control group), CT scans of patients affected by diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis non-type 2, and CT scans of patients affected by diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis type 2. Results: Identification of all frontal cell types was accurate in patients not presenting sinus complaints (P-value < 0.05). Patients scoring 9 or more points in the Lund-Mackay scoring system demonstrated a statistically increased risk of improper identification of frontal recess cells (P-value < 0.0001). Conclusions: Due to a large number of possible anatomical variants and changes caused by the chronic inflammatory disease, the IFAC nomenclatura is easier to apply to non-type 2 primary diffuse CRS patients with low scores in the L-M score scale than to primary diffuse type 2 CRS patients with higher M-L scores..","PeriodicalId":42608,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction:The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) is a consensus document created to standardize and specify the naming of cells within the region of the frontal recess and frontal sinus. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the difficulties in identifying cells according to the IFAC in patients with diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis. Material and methods: Three independent reviewers examined triplanar computed tomography (CT) scans to assess the anatomy of the frontal recess using the IFAC system. CT scans were chosen randomly and divided into 3 groups: CT scans of patients not presenting sinus complaints (control group), CT scans of patients affected by diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis non-type 2, and CT scans of patients affected by diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis type 2. Results: Identification of all frontal cell types was accurate in patients not presenting sinus complaints (P-value < 0.05). Patients scoring 9 or more points in the Lund-Mackay scoring system demonstrated a statistically increased risk of improper identification of frontal recess cells (P-value < 0.0001). Conclusions: Due to a large number of possible anatomical variants and changes caused by the chronic inflammatory disease, the IFAC nomenclatura is easier to apply to non-type 2 primary diffuse CRS patients with low scores in the L-M score scale than to primary diffuse type 2 CRS patients with higher M-L scores..
根据国际额窦解剖分类(IFAC)对额隐窝细胞的三维计算机断层分析——弥漫性原发性慢性鼻窦炎患者额隐窝细胞鉴别的困难?
简介:国际额窦解剖分类(IFAC)是一份共识文件,旨在规范和指定额隐窝和额窦区域内细胞的命名。目的:本研究的目的是分析弥漫性原发性慢性鼻窦炎患者根据IFAC识别细胞的困难。材料和方法:三位独立的审稿人检查了使用IFAC系统的三平面计算机断层扫描(CT)来评估额叶隐窝的解剖结构。随机选择CT扫描,分为3组:无鼻窦主诉患者的CT扫描(对照组)、非2型弥漫性原发性慢性鼻窦炎患者的CT扫描和2型弥漫性原发性慢性鼻窦炎患者的CT扫描。结果:在没有鼻窦疾患的患者中,所有额叶细胞类型的识别都是准确的(p值< 0.05)。在Lund-Mackay评分系统中得分为9分或以上的患者,在统计上显示额隐窝细胞识别不当的风险增加(p值< 0.0001)。结论:由于慢性炎症性疾病引起的大量可能的解剖变异和改变,IFAC命名法更容易适用于L-M评分较低的非2型原发性弥漫性CRS患者,而不适用于M-L评分较高的原发性弥漫性2型CRS患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信