Thomas Reid on Reidian Religious Belief Forming Faculties

Ryan Nichols, Robert Callergård
{"title":"Thomas Reid on Reidian Religious Belief Forming Faculties","authors":"Ryan Nichols, Robert Callergård","doi":"10.5840/SCHOOLMAN2011883/418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of epistemology in philosophy of religion hastransformed the discipline by diverting questions away from traditionalmetaphysical issues and toward concerns about justificationand warrant. Leaders responsible for these changes, includingPlantinga, Alston and Draper, use methods and arguments fromScottish Enlightenment figures. In general theists use and cite techniquespioneered by Reid and non-theists use and cite techniquespioneered by Hume, a split reduplicated among cognitive scientistsof religion, with Justin Barrett and Scott Atran respectively framingtheir results in Reid’s and in Hume’s language and argument. Thisstate of affairs sets our agenda. First we identify Reid’s use in theepistemology of religion and in the cognitive science of religion.Then we turn to Reid’s texts in an effort to assess the interpretationsand extrapolations of Reid given by participants in these debates.The answers to our research questions shed light on whatReid would believe today, were he apprised of the latest research inepistemology of and cognitive science of religion.","PeriodicalId":83189,"journal":{"name":"The Modern schoolman","volume":"88 1","pages":"317-335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Modern schoolman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/SCHOOLMAN2011883/418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The role of epistemology in philosophy of religion hastransformed the discipline by diverting questions away from traditionalmetaphysical issues and toward concerns about justificationand warrant. Leaders responsible for these changes, includingPlantinga, Alston and Draper, use methods and arguments fromScottish Enlightenment figures. In general theists use and cite techniquespioneered by Reid and non-theists use and cite techniquespioneered by Hume, a split reduplicated among cognitive scientistsof religion, with Justin Barrett and Scott Atran respectively framingtheir results in Reid’s and in Hume’s language and argument. Thisstate of affairs sets our agenda. First we identify Reid’s use in theepistemology of religion and in the cognitive science of religion.Then we turn to Reid’s texts in an effort to assess the interpretationsand extrapolations of Reid given by participants in these debates.The answers to our research questions shed light on whatReid would believe today, were he apprised of the latest research inepistemology of and cognitive science of religion.
托马斯·里德论里德的宗教信仰形成能力
认识论在宗教哲学中的作用改变了这一学科,将问题从传统的形而上学问题转移到对辩护和保证的关注。负责这些变化的领导人,包括普兰廷加、奥尔斯顿和德雷珀,使用了苏格兰启蒙运动人物的方法和论点。一般来说,有神论者使用并引用里德首创的技术,而非有神论者使用并引用休谟首创的技术,这种分裂在宗教认知科学家中重复出现,贾斯汀·巴雷特(Justin Barrett)和斯科特·阿特兰(Scott Atran)分别在里德和休谟的语言和论点中构建了他们的结果。这种事态决定了我们的议程。首先,我们确定里德在宗教认识论和宗教认知科学中的应用。然后,我们转向里德的文本,努力评估这些辩论的参与者对里德的解释和推断。我们的研究问题的答案揭示了里德今天会相信什么,如果他被告知宗教的认识论和认知科学的最新研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书