Tubulo-villous adenoma with severe dysplasia in the prostatic urethra: A case report and histogenetic considerations

T. Terada
{"title":"Tubulo-villous adenoma with severe dysplasia in the prostatic urethra: A case report and histogenetic considerations","authors":"T. Terada","doi":"10.5430/crcp.v4n1p22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2002, Seibel et al. presented a case series of 18 patients with villous adenomas of the urethra. Since then, only a couple of reports regarding this rare entity have been published. Recently (2013), Kao and Epstein proposed a new entity of tubular adenoma (4 cases) in the urinary tract, being similar to tubular adenomas in gastrointestinal (GI) tract; no following cases have been reported. Herein presented a case of tubule-villous adenoma (TVA) in the prostatic urethra (PU) of a 77-year-old man male patient suffering from dysuria. Cystscopy showed a polypoid/villous tumor of the PU, and transurethral resection of this tumor was performed. Grossly, fragments of the tumor measured 12 mm in diameter and polypoid/villous. Microscopically, it was a TVA indistinguishable from GI adenomas. No urothelium was seen, but a few normal prostatic glands were noted. The tumor showed mild to severe dysplasia, but in situ malignant transformation and invasive malignancy were not seen. Histochemically, acidic mucins were present. Immunohistochemical staining results of the tumor cells were as follows: cytokeratin(CK) AE1/3+++, CKCAM5.2+++, CD34BE12+, CK5+, CK6+, CK7++, CK14-, CK20+, EMA+, CDX-2-, CEA++, CA19-9++, CA125-, vimentin-, NSE-, NCAM-, synaptophysin-, chromogranin-, E-cadherin+++, beta-catenin+++, MUC1++, MUC2-, MUC5AC++, MUC6+, PSA+++, AMACR+++, AFP-, HepPar1-, p53-, KIT-, PDGFRA+, MET+, HER2-, Ki67+ (labeling = 5%). Myoepithelial cells were present in some areas. These results suggest the development and presence of a TVA in the PU indistinguishable from those in the GI tract, and it can arise from prostatic epithelium.","PeriodicalId":90463,"journal":{"name":"Case reports in clinical pathology","volume":"4 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/crcp.v4n1p22","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case reports in clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/crcp.v4n1p22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2002, Seibel et al. presented a case series of 18 patients with villous adenomas of the urethra. Since then, only a couple of reports regarding this rare entity have been published. Recently (2013), Kao and Epstein proposed a new entity of tubular adenoma (4 cases) in the urinary tract, being similar to tubular adenomas in gastrointestinal (GI) tract; no following cases have been reported. Herein presented a case of tubule-villous adenoma (TVA) in the prostatic urethra (PU) of a 77-year-old man male patient suffering from dysuria. Cystscopy showed a polypoid/villous tumor of the PU, and transurethral resection of this tumor was performed. Grossly, fragments of the tumor measured 12 mm in diameter and polypoid/villous. Microscopically, it was a TVA indistinguishable from GI adenomas. No urothelium was seen, but a few normal prostatic glands were noted. The tumor showed mild to severe dysplasia, but in situ malignant transformation and invasive malignancy were not seen. Histochemically, acidic mucins were present. Immunohistochemical staining results of the tumor cells were as follows: cytokeratin(CK) AE1/3+++, CKCAM5.2+++, CD34BE12+, CK5+, CK6+, CK7++, CK14-, CK20+, EMA+, CDX-2-, CEA++, CA19-9++, CA125-, vimentin-, NSE-, NCAM-, synaptophysin-, chromogranin-, E-cadherin+++, beta-catenin+++, MUC1++, MUC2-, MUC5AC++, MUC6+, PSA+++, AMACR+++, AFP-, HepPar1-, p53-, KIT-, PDGFRA+, MET+, HER2-, Ki67+ (labeling = 5%). Myoepithelial cells were present in some areas. These results suggest the development and presence of a TVA in the PU indistinguishable from those in the GI tract, and it can arise from prostatic epithelium.
前列腺尿道管状绒毛腺瘤伴严重不典型增生:1例报告及组织遗传学考虑
2002年,Seibel等人报道了18例尿道绒毛腺瘤患者的病例系列。从那时起,只有几篇关于这种罕见实体的报道被发表。最近(2013),Kao和Epstein提出了一种新的尿路管状腺瘤(4例),类似于胃肠道管状腺瘤;未报告下列病例。本文报告一位77岁男性患者,因排尿困难而在前列腺尿道(PU)发生小管绒毛状腺瘤(TVA)。膀胱镜检查显示PU息肉样/绒毛状肿瘤,经尿道切除该肿瘤。肉眼可见肿瘤碎片直径12mm,呈息肉样/绒毛状。显微镜下,TVA与胃肠道腺瘤难以区分。未见尿路上皮,但见少量正常前列腺。肿瘤表现为轻至重度发育不良,未见原位恶性转化及侵袭性恶性。组织化学上可见酸性粘蛋白。肿瘤细胞免疫组化染色结果为:细胞角蛋白(CK) AE1/3+++、CKCAM5.2+++、CD34BE12+、CK5+、CK6+、CK7++、CK14-、CK20+、EMA+、CDX-2-、CEA++、CA19-9++、CA125-、vimentin-、NSE-、NCAM-、synaptophysin-、chromogranin-、E-cadherin++、β -catenin++、MUC1++、MUC2-、MUC5AC++、MUC6+、PSA++、AMACR++、AFP-、HepPar1-、p53-、KIT-、PDGFRA+、MET+、HER2-、Ki67+(标记率为5%)。局部可见肌上皮细胞。这些结果提示PU中TVA的发展和存在与胃肠道中的TVA难以区分,并且它可能起源于前列腺上皮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信