Comparative evaluation of argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions parameters in benign and malignant breast tumors

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
M. Koksal, S. Doğan, R. Eroz, F. Ozturk, A. Ozturk, N. Cucer
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions parameters in benign and malignant breast tumors","authors":"M. Koksal, S. Doğan, R. Eroz, F. Ozturk, A. Ozturk, N. Cucer","doi":"10.5937/afmnai40-35516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The aim of the paper was to evaluate the AgNOR parameters for the discrimination of benign from malignant breast tumors via a new approach - the total AgNOR area/nuclear area (TAA/NA). Material and methods. Three groups, consisting of control (n = 14), benign (n = 18) and malignant (n = 28) participants were included in the study. The AgNOR staining technique was performed and both mean AgNOR number and TAA/NA ratio were evaluated. Results. While the differences between the control and patient groups were statistically significant for AgNOR number (p < 0.001), it was not significant between the malignant group and the benign group for mean AgNOR number (p > 0.05). For the ratio of TAA/NA, the differences between the control and benign group (p < 0.001), control and malignant group (p < 0.001), and malignant and benign patient groups were significant. (p < 0.05). Conclusion. We consider that the evaluation of the TAA/NA rate, when compared with the AgNOR number, can be more sensitive and useful tool for distinguishing benign from the malignant breast lesions.","PeriodicalId":7132,"journal":{"name":"Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/afmnai40-35516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim. The aim of the paper was to evaluate the AgNOR parameters for the discrimination of benign from malignant breast tumors via a new approach - the total AgNOR area/nuclear area (TAA/NA). Material and methods. Three groups, consisting of control (n = 14), benign (n = 18) and malignant (n = 28) participants were included in the study. The AgNOR staining technique was performed and both mean AgNOR number and TAA/NA ratio were evaluated. Results. While the differences between the control and patient groups were statistically significant for AgNOR number (p < 0.001), it was not significant between the malignant group and the benign group for mean AgNOR number (p > 0.05). For the ratio of TAA/NA, the differences between the control and benign group (p < 0.001), control and malignant group (p < 0.001), and malignant and benign patient groups were significant. (p < 0.05). Conclusion. We consider that the evaluation of the TAA/NA rate, when compared with the AgNOR number, can be more sensitive and useful tool for distinguishing benign from the malignant breast lesions.
乳腺良恶性肿瘤中亲银核仁组织区参数的比较评价
的目标。本文的目的是通过AgNOR总面积/核面积(TAA/NA)的新方法来评价AgNOR参数对乳腺良恶性肿瘤的鉴别作用。材料和方法。研究分为对照组(n = 14)、良性组(n = 18)和恶性组(n = 28)。采用AgNOR染色技术,评估平均AgNOR数和TAA/NA比值。结果。正常组与患者组AgNOR数比较差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001),恶性组与良性组平均AgNOR数比较差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。TAA/NA比值,对照组与良性组(p < 0.001)、对照组与恶性组(p < 0.001)、恶性组与良性组差异均有统计学意义。(p < 0.05)。结论。我们认为TAA/NA率的评估,与AgNOR数相比,可以更敏感和有用的工具来区分乳腺良恶性病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis
Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信