C. Chinniah, A. Ravikumar, M. Kalyanasundaram, P. Parthiban
{"title":"FIELD EVALUATION OF METARHIZIUM ANISOPLIAE LIQUID FORMULATION (BIOMAGIC®) AGAINST BROWN PLANT HOPPER, NILAPARVATA LUGENS STAL ON RICE","authors":"C. Chinniah, A. Ravikumar, M. Kalyanasundaram, P. Parthiban","doi":"10.57182/jbiopestic.9.2.211-219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the bio-efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae– based liquid formulations (Bio-Magic®1.50%) against Brown Plant Hopper (BPH), Nilaparvatha lugens Stal (Homoptera: Delphacidae) at the farmers’ holdings of Theni district during Summer 2015 and kharif 2015. Bio-Magic was tested at three doses of 1500 mL, 2000 mL and 4000 mL ha-1 against BPH. The results revealed that Biomagic @ 4000 mL ha-1 (84.08 and 83.21 per cent) and 2000 mL ha-1 (82.76 and 81.62 %) statistically on par in terms of efficacy in suppressing the population of BPH after two rounds of application during both the seasons with increase in grain yield of 89.58 and 88.60 per cent over untreated check. The lower dose of Biomagic® 1.5 LF @ 1500 mL ha1 ranked second in the order of efficacy, however it was better than the standard check (Quinolphos 25 EC @ 1500 mL ha-1). All the three doses of Biomagic® tested were safer to the natural enemies and were on par with untreated check without any phytotoxicity effect.","PeriodicalId":15069,"journal":{"name":"journal of biopesticides","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of biopesticides","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57182/jbiopestic.9.2.211-219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the bio-efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae– based liquid formulations (Bio-Magic®1.50%) against Brown Plant Hopper (BPH), Nilaparvatha lugens Stal (Homoptera: Delphacidae) at the farmers’ holdings of Theni district during Summer 2015 and kharif 2015. Bio-Magic was tested at three doses of 1500 mL, 2000 mL and 4000 mL ha-1 against BPH. The results revealed that Biomagic @ 4000 mL ha-1 (84.08 and 83.21 per cent) and 2000 mL ha-1 (82.76 and 81.62 %) statistically on par in terms of efficacy in suppressing the population of BPH after two rounds of application during both the seasons with increase in grain yield of 89.58 and 88.60 per cent over untreated check. The lower dose of Biomagic® 1.5 LF @ 1500 mL ha1 ranked second in the order of efficacy, however it was better than the standard check (Quinolphos 25 EC @ 1500 mL ha-1). All the three doses of Biomagic® tested were safer to the natural enemies and were on par with untreated check without any phytotoxicity effect.
本研究于2015年夏季和2015年秋季在泰尼地区农民农场进行了以绿僵菌(Metarhizium anisopliae)为基础的液体制剂(Bio-Magic®1.50%)防治褐飞虱(BPH)和褐飞虱(Nilaparvatha lugens Stal)的田间试验。Bio-Magic以1500 mL、2000 mL和4000 mL ha-1三种剂量对BPH进行了试验。结果表明,4000 mL ha-1(84.08和83.21%)和2000 mL ha-1(82.76和81.62%)在两个季节施用两轮后对BPH种群的抑制效果具有统计学意义上的同等作用,产量比未处理的增加89.58%和88.60%。低剂量Biomagic®1.5 LF @ 1500 mL ha-1的疗效排名第二,但优于标准检查(Quinolphos 25 EC @ 1500 mL ha-1)。所有三种剂量的Biomagic®测试对天敌都更安全,并且与未经处理的检查相当,没有任何植物毒性作用。