Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy added to a physical therapy program for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Q3 Medicine
Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz, R. Liebano, M. Vera, J. Cancino
{"title":"Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy added to a physical therapy program for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz, R. Liebano, M. Vera, J. Cancino","doi":"10.5114/areh.2022.119498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has been incorporated last years as a new resource for musculoskeletal pain management, although studies that support it in Myofascial pain syndrome (MFPS) are limited. This systematic review (SR) aimed to determine the effectiveness of HILT as a therapeutic resource for myofascial pain management. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cinahl, Science Direct, and PEDro databases on April 30,2022. The selection criteria included RCTs that compared HILT added to a physical therapy program to a program without HILT, considering as the main outcome pain reduction and secondary results improvement in range of motion or disability in adults with MFPS. Three studies met the eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Rob2 tool, and a meta-analysis was conducted removing one low-quality study. RCTs reported a pain decrease for HILT (p < 0.01), and the meta-analysis revealed a mean difference of –1.90 cm (CI 95% = – 2.58,-1.22) for the visual analog scale (0–10 cm) after four weeks, with a pooled effect in favor of HILT (p < 0.01). Although the RCTs individually document improvements in range of motion (ROM) (p < 0.05). RCTs show that HILT is effective in reducing pain but not in improving the range of motion in MFPS patients. How-ever, even though the combined analgesic effect is significant, it would not have sufficient clinical relevance. The devel opment of new RCTs is suggested to confirm or improve these results.","PeriodicalId":52524,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2022.119498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has been incorporated last years as a new resource for musculoskeletal pain management, although studies that support it in Myofascial pain syndrome (MFPS) are limited. This systematic review (SR) aimed to determine the effectiveness of HILT as a therapeutic resource for myofascial pain management. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cinahl, Science Direct, and PEDro databases on April 30,2022. The selection criteria included RCTs that compared HILT added to a physical therapy program to a program without HILT, considering as the main outcome pain reduction and secondary results improvement in range of motion or disability in adults with MFPS. Three studies met the eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Rob2 tool, and a meta-analysis was conducted removing one low-quality study. RCTs reported a pain decrease for HILT (p < 0.01), and the meta-analysis revealed a mean difference of –1.90 cm (CI 95% = – 2.58,-1.22) for the visual analog scale (0–10 cm) after four weeks, with a pooled effect in favor of HILT (p < 0.01). Although the RCTs individually document improvements in range of motion (ROM) (p < 0.05). RCTs show that HILT is effective in reducing pain but not in improving the range of motion in MFPS patients. How-ever, even though the combined analgesic effect is significant, it would not have sufficient clinical relevance. The devel opment of new RCTs is suggested to confirm or improve these results.
高强度激光治疗的有效性添加到治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的物理治疗方案。系统回顾和荟萃分析
尽管支持高强度激光治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MFPS)的研究有限,但近年来,高强度激光治疗(HILT)已被纳入肌肉骨骼疼痛管理的新资源。本系统综述(SR)旨在确定HILT作为肌筋膜疼痛治疗资源的有效性。随机临床试验(RCTs)于2022年4月30日在PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Cinahl、Science Direct和PEDro数据库中检索。选择标准包括比较HILT加物理治疗方案和不加HILT方案的随机对照试验,考虑到主要结果是减轻疼痛,次要结果是改善MFPS成人的活动范围或残疾。三项研究符合入选标准并纳入分析。使用Cochrane Rob2工具评估偏倚风险,并进行荟萃分析,剔除一项低质量研究。rct报告HILT的疼痛减轻(p < 0.01), meta分析显示,四周后视觉模拟量表(0-10 cm)的平均差异为- 1.90 cm (CI 95% = - 2.58,-1.22),综合效应有利于HILT (p < 0.01)。尽管随机对照试验单独记录了活动范围(ROM)的改善(p < 0.05)。随机对照试验显示,HILT可有效减轻MFPS患者的疼痛,但不能改善其活动范围。然而,即使联合镇痛效果显著,也没有足够的临床相关性。建议开展新的随机对照试验来证实或改进这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy Rehabilitacji
Postepy Rehabilitacji Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Rehabilitation is not only directed to representatives of biological and medical sciences, specialists from almost all fields of medicine, such as cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, traumatology and internal diseases, have been published in it. The journal contains papers concerning psychological, sociological, and occupational rehabilitation, along with articles which deal with organization and marketing. The journal is also dedicated to the ethical problems of rehabilitation. A significant part of the published papers have focused on the problems of sport and physical activity for people with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信