World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: psychometric properties and validation of the Ukrainian version in a sample of cadets of the Armed Forces

Q3 Medicine
Iu. O. Pavlova, Ostap Muzyka, K. Tymruk-Skoropad
{"title":"World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: psychometric properties and validation of the Ukrainian version in a sample of cadets of the Armed Forces","authors":"Iu. O. Pavlova, Ostap Muzyka, K. Tymruk-Skoropad","doi":"10.5114/areh.2022.116702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The health and functioning of the military are a priority in Ukraine. The WHODAS as the international tool for assessing the level of disability can be effectively used within the health care system in such a group of the population. The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of Ukrainian version of the WHODAS 2.0 in a sample of cadets. Material and methods: Military cadets responded to the Ukrainian 36-item version of the WHODAS and MOS SF-36 scales. The internal consistency, structure, and construct validity of the WHODAS were examined. Results: A homogeneous sample of military personnel’s was obtained in terms of age, living situations and level of physical activity. Internal consistency of the all WHODAS domain by Cronbach’s alpha was 0.951. Final model which consisted of six factors was identified by the results of exploratory factor analysis. Factors covered 66.413% of the total variance. Numerous negative moderate or high correlations were also found between almost all MOS SF-36 questionnaire scales and WHODAS domains (r = –0.553 – –0.513). Ten out of 14 a priori assumed hypotheses (71.4%) were confirmed, that indicated moderate construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0. Conclusions: The Ukrainian version of WHODAS 2.0 had a high internal consistency and sufficient construct valid ity. It shows as a valid instrument to assess the general level and main domains of functioning of specific categories of the population. The WHODAS can be a useful to obtain information about the limitations in functioning in Ukrainian speaking population for health and social policy services in different countries.","PeriodicalId":52524,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2022.116702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The health and functioning of the military are a priority in Ukraine. The WHODAS as the international tool for assessing the level of disability can be effectively used within the health care system in such a group of the population. The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of Ukrainian version of the WHODAS 2.0 in a sample of cadets. Material and methods: Military cadets responded to the Ukrainian 36-item version of the WHODAS and MOS SF-36 scales. The internal consistency, structure, and construct validity of the WHODAS were examined. Results: A homogeneous sample of military personnel’s was obtained in terms of age, living situations and level of physical activity. Internal consistency of the all WHODAS domain by Cronbach’s alpha was 0.951. Final model which consisted of six factors was identified by the results of exploratory factor analysis. Factors covered 66.413% of the total variance. Numerous negative moderate or high correlations were also found between almost all MOS SF-36 questionnaire scales and WHODAS domains (r = –0.553 – –0.513). Ten out of 14 a priori assumed hypotheses (71.4%) were confirmed, that indicated moderate construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0. Conclusions: The Ukrainian version of WHODAS 2.0 had a high internal consistency and sufficient construct valid ity. It shows as a valid instrument to assess the general level and main domains of functioning of specific categories of the population. The WHODAS can be a useful to obtain information about the limitations in functioning in Ukrainian speaking population for health and social policy services in different countries.
世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0:心理计量学特性和乌克兰版本在武装部队学员样本中的验证
简介:军队的健康和运作是乌克兰的一个优先事项。作为评估残疾水平的国际工具,《世界卫生分类》可在卫生保健系统内有效地用于这类人群。目的是在学员样本中检查乌克兰版WHODAS 2.0的心理测量特性。材料和方法:军事学员回答了乌克兰的WHODAS和MOS SF-36量表的36项版本。检验了WHODAS的内部一致性、结构和结构效度。结果:军人的年龄、生活状况和身体活动水平具有同质性。所有WHODAS域的Cronbach 's alpha内部一致性为0.951。探索性因子分析的结果确定了最终的模型,该模型由六个因素组成。因子占总方差的66.413%。几乎所有MOS SF-36问卷量表与WHODAS域之间也存在大量负的中度或高度相关(r = - 0.553 ~ - 0.513)。14个先验假设中有10个(71.4%)被证实,表明WHODAS 2.0的结构效度中等。结论:乌克兰版WHODAS 2.0具有较高的内部一致性和足够的结构效度。它是评估人口中特定类别的一般水平和主要职能领域的有效工具。世卫数据系统可用于获取有关不同国家讲乌克兰语人口的卫生和社会政策服务在运作方面的局限性的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy Rehabilitacji
Postepy Rehabilitacji Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Rehabilitation is not only directed to representatives of biological and medical sciences, specialists from almost all fields of medicine, such as cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, traumatology and internal diseases, have been published in it. The journal contains papers concerning psychological, sociological, and occupational rehabilitation, along with articles which deal with organization and marketing. The journal is also dedicated to the ethical problems of rehabilitation. A significant part of the published papers have focused on the problems of sport and physical activity for people with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信