The effectiveness of neural mobilization in addition to conservative physiotherapy on cervical posture, pain and functionality in patients with cervical disc herniation

Q3 Medicine
Tecelli Kayiran, Begümhan Turhan
{"title":"The effectiveness of neural mobilization \nin addition to conservative physiotherapy \non cervical posture, pain and functionality \nin patients with cervical disc herniation","authors":"Tecelli Kayiran, Begümhan Turhan","doi":"10.5114/areh.2021.107788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Medical treatment, conservative physiotherapy (CP), exercise, mobilization and prevention methods should be taken into consideration in cervical problems. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of neural mobilization (NM) combined with CP on cervical posture, pain functionality in patients with cervical disc herniation (CDH). Material and methods: Sixty patients with CDH and radicular pain participated in this randomized controlled study. They were randomly allocated into two groups. The control group (n = 30) received CP (hotpack, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, ultrasound), and the experimental group (n = 30) received CP plus NM on the radial, median and ulnar nerves. Both groups received the CP for three weeks (15 sessions). The experimental group received the neural mobilization technique for three weeks (3 sessions per week). The demographic data, severity of pain (by Visual Analog Scale), cervical active range of motion degree, and cervical posture data (by Tragus to Wall test, Measurement of C7 to Wall Distance) have been recorded. Neck Disability Index (NDI) was applied to all participants for functionality. Results: The distance between tragus and the wall decreased in the experimental group (p < 0.05), whereas there was not any significant difference in the distance between C7 and the wall (p > 0.05). The scores of pain and cervical active range of motion were found different in favor of the experimental group (p < 0.05). The NDI scores were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: CP together with NM techniques will provide additional gains in cervical posture, pain, and active range of motion in patients diagnosed with cervical disc herniation.","PeriodicalId":52524,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2021.107788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: Medical treatment, conservative physiotherapy (CP), exercise, mobilization and prevention methods should be taken into consideration in cervical problems. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of neural mobilization (NM) combined with CP on cervical posture, pain functionality in patients with cervical disc herniation (CDH). Material and methods: Sixty patients with CDH and radicular pain participated in this randomized controlled study. They were randomly allocated into two groups. The control group (n = 30) received CP (hotpack, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, ultrasound), and the experimental group (n = 30) received CP plus NM on the radial, median and ulnar nerves. Both groups received the CP for three weeks (15 sessions). The experimental group received the neural mobilization technique for three weeks (3 sessions per week). The demographic data, severity of pain (by Visual Analog Scale), cervical active range of motion degree, and cervical posture data (by Tragus to Wall test, Measurement of C7 to Wall Distance) have been recorded. Neck Disability Index (NDI) was applied to all participants for functionality. Results: The distance between tragus and the wall decreased in the experimental group (p < 0.05), whereas there was not any significant difference in the distance between C7 and the wall (p > 0.05). The scores of pain and cervical active range of motion were found different in favor of the experimental group (p < 0.05). The NDI scores were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: CP together with NM techniques will provide additional gains in cervical posture, pain, and active range of motion in patients diagnosed with cervical disc herniation.
神经活动加保守理疗对颈椎间盘突出症患者颈椎姿势、疼痛和功能的影响
颈椎问题应综合考虑药物治疗、保守理疗、运动、活动和预防等方法。我们旨在探讨神经活动(NM)联合CP对颈椎间盘突出症(CDH)患者颈椎姿势、疼痛功能的影响。材料和方法:60例CDH合并神经根性疼痛患者参与了本随机对照研究。他们被随机分为两组。对照组(n = 30)采用CP(热敷、经皮神经电刺激、超声)治疗,实验组(n = 30)采用CP + NM治疗桡、正中、尺神经。两组均接受CP治疗3周(15个疗程)。实验组接受神经活动技术治疗3周(每周3次)。统计数据、疼痛严重程度(通过视觉模拟量表)、颈椎活动范围和颈椎姿势数据(通过耳屏到壁面测试、C7到壁面距离测量)均已记录。颈部残疾指数(NDI)用于所有参与者的功能。结果:实验组耳屏与耳壁的距离减小(p < 0.05),而C7与耳壁的距离差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。疼痛评分和颈椎活动度评分实验组差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组患者NDI评分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:CP联合NM技术将为诊断为颈椎间盘突出的患者提供额外的颈椎姿势、疼痛和活动范围的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy Rehabilitacji
Postepy Rehabilitacji Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Rehabilitation is not only directed to representatives of biological and medical sciences, specialists from almost all fields of medicine, such as cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, traumatology and internal diseases, have been published in it. The journal contains papers concerning psychological, sociological, and occupational rehabilitation, along with articles which deal with organization and marketing. The journal is also dedicated to the ethical problems of rehabilitation. A significant part of the published papers have focused on the problems of sport and physical activity for people with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信