The effects of differences in sleep quality and quantity on VO2max levels

Q3 Medicine
Nia Sri Ramania, T. Apriantono, B. Winata
{"title":"The effects of differences in sleep quality and quantity on VO2max levels","authors":"Nia Sri Ramania, T. Apriantono, B. Winata","doi":"10.5114/AREH.2020.100968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Sleep quality and quantity are factors that affect one’s cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). Therefore, this study aims to compare the effects of different sleep quality and quantity on VO2max levels. Material and methods: 64 participants were involved in this study, and they were divided into two groups based on their sleep quality and quantity. This division was determined by employing sleep pattern questionnaires. Group 1 was comprised of 32 participants with good sleep quality. Generally, they only slept for 6 hours, however, their sleep quality was very good. On the contrary, group 2 consisted of 32 participants with poor sleep quality, irrespective of the fact that their sleep durations were around 7 hours, which is longer than group 1. All participants went through a series of pretest sessions for one week to determine their average heart rate (HR) before and after sleep. Furthermore, they underwent experimental sessions which required them to participate in the cooper 2.4 km test to determine their VO2max levels. Results: The results show a significant difference in participants’ VO2max levels, with the average in group 1 being higher than in group 2 (F = 5.853) (p = 0.018). This result was obtained from statistical tests using a one-way ANOVA. Conclusions: This study indicates that having good quality sleep for 6 hours plays a crucial role in maintaining and increasing CRF.","PeriodicalId":52524,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/AREH.2020.100968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Sleep quality and quantity are factors that affect one’s cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). Therefore, this study aims to compare the effects of different sleep quality and quantity on VO2max levels. Material and methods: 64 participants were involved in this study, and they were divided into two groups based on their sleep quality and quantity. This division was determined by employing sleep pattern questionnaires. Group 1 was comprised of 32 participants with good sleep quality. Generally, they only slept for 6 hours, however, their sleep quality was very good. On the contrary, group 2 consisted of 32 participants with poor sleep quality, irrespective of the fact that their sleep durations were around 7 hours, which is longer than group 1. All participants went through a series of pretest sessions for one week to determine their average heart rate (HR) before and after sleep. Furthermore, they underwent experimental sessions which required them to participate in the cooper 2.4 km test to determine their VO2max levels. Results: The results show a significant difference in participants’ VO2max levels, with the average in group 1 being higher than in group 2 (F = 5.853) (p = 0.018). This result was obtained from statistical tests using a one-way ANOVA. Conclusions: This study indicates that having good quality sleep for 6 hours plays a crucial role in maintaining and increasing CRF.
睡眠质量和睡眠量的差异对最大摄氧量水平的影响
睡眠质量和睡眠时间是影响心肺健康(CRF)的重要因素。因此,本研究旨在比较不同睡眠质量和睡眠时间对VO2max水平的影响。材料和方法:64名参与者参与了这项研究,根据他们的睡眠质量和睡眠时间分为两组。这种划分是通过使用睡眠模式问卷来确定的。第一组由32名睡眠质量良好的参与者组成。一般来说,他们只睡了6个小时,但他们的睡眠质量很好。相反,第二组有32名睡眠质量较差的参与者,尽管他们的睡眠时间在7小时左右,比第一组长。所有参与者都经历了为期一周的一系列预测试,以确定他们睡前和睡觉后的平均心率(HR)。此外,他们还进行了实验,要求他们参加库珀2.4公里的测试,以确定他们的最大摄氧量水平。结果:结果显示,参与者的VO2max水平有显著差异,组1的平均值高于组2 (F = 5.853) (p = 0.018)。这一结果是通过使用单因素方差分析的统计检验获得的。结论:本研究提示6小时高质量睡眠对维持和增加CRF起着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy Rehabilitacji
Postepy Rehabilitacji Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Rehabilitation is not only directed to representatives of biological and medical sciences, specialists from almost all fields of medicine, such as cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, traumatology and internal diseases, have been published in it. The journal contains papers concerning psychological, sociological, and occupational rehabilitation, along with articles which deal with organization and marketing. The journal is also dedicated to the ethical problems of rehabilitation. A significant part of the published papers have focused on the problems of sport and physical activity for people with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信