Performance of coconut shell ash and palm kernel shell ash as partial replacement for cement in concrete

O. Oyedepo, L. M. Olanitori, Sumbo Philip Akande
{"title":"Performance of coconut shell ash and palm kernel shell ash as partial replacement for cement in concrete","authors":"O. Oyedepo, L. M. Olanitori, Sumbo Philip Akande","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.241986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High cost of cement used as binder in the production of concrete has led to a search for alternative. Using a mix design ratio of 1:2:4 and water binder ratio of 0.63, concrete cubes were casted using varying ordinary Portland cement (OPC): palm kernel shell ash (PKSA) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC): coconut shell ash (CSA) ratios of 100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30 , 60:40 and 50:50 respectively. This research reveal that partial replacement of cement with 20% PKSA and CSA in concrete gives an average optimum compressive strength of 15.4 N/mm2 and 17.26 N/mm2 respectively at 28 days. While, the optimum value of compressive strength obtained at 28 days is 20.58 N/mm2 at 10% replacement with CSA. The value obtained is suitable for both light weight and heavy weight concrete respectively. Thus, the research show that the use of PKSA and CSA as a partial replacement for cement in concrete, at lower volume of replacement, will enhance the reduction of cement usage in concretes, thereby reducing the production cost and the environmental pollution caused by the dumping of the agricultural waste.","PeriodicalId":33130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Building Materials and Structures","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Building Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.241986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

High cost of cement used as binder in the production of concrete has led to a search for alternative. Using a mix design ratio of 1:2:4 and water binder ratio of 0.63, concrete cubes were casted using varying ordinary Portland cement (OPC): palm kernel shell ash (PKSA) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC): coconut shell ash (CSA) ratios of 100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30 , 60:40 and 50:50 respectively. This research reveal that partial replacement of cement with 20% PKSA and CSA in concrete gives an average optimum compressive strength of 15.4 N/mm2 and 17.26 N/mm2 respectively at 28 days. While, the optimum value of compressive strength obtained at 28 days is 20.58 N/mm2 at 10% replacement with CSA. The value obtained is suitable for both light weight and heavy weight concrete respectively. Thus, the research show that the use of PKSA and CSA as a partial replacement for cement in concrete, at lower volume of replacement, will enhance the reduction of cement usage in concretes, thereby reducing the production cost and the environmental pollution caused by the dumping of the agricultural waste.
椰壳灰和棕榈仁灰在混凝土中部分替代水泥的性能
在混凝土生产中,作为粘合剂的水泥成本高,这促使人们寻找替代品。采用设计配合比为1:2:4、水胶比为0.63的方法,将普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)与棕榈仁壳灰(PKSA)、普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)与椰子壳灰(CSA)的比例分别为100:0、90:10、80:20、70:30、60:40和50:50浇筑混凝土立方体。本研究表明,在混凝土中部分替换20% PKSA和CSA的水泥,28天的平均最佳抗压强度分别为15.4 N/mm2和17.26 N/mm2。当CSA替代量为10%时,28d抗压强度最佳值为20.58 N/mm2。所得值分别适用于轻、重混凝土。因此,研究表明,使用PKSA和CSA作为混凝土中水泥的部分替代,在较低的替代量下,将增强混凝土中水泥使用量的减少,从而降低生产成本和农业废弃物倾倒造成的环境污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信