The Names of the Balkan Peoples and the Names of the Inhabitants of Balkan Countries in Lexicography (on the Example of the Dictionary of Montenegrin National and Literary Language)

IF 0.9 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Lexikos Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5788/33-1-1797
Sanja Šubarić, Jovana Đurčević
{"title":"The Names of the Balkan Peoples and the Names of the Inhabitants of Balkan Countries in Lexicography (on the Example of the Dictionary of Montenegrin National and Literary Language)","authors":"Sanja Šubarić, Jovana Đurčević","doi":"10.5788/33-1-1797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lexicography is yet another witness of the historic recurrence in the Balkans — fifty years after banning Miloš Moskovljević's Dictionary of Contemporary Serbo-Croatian Literary Language with Language Manual (1966), the distribution of the first volume of the Dictionary of Montenegrin National and Literary Language (2016) of the Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts was stopped due to political reasons. Among other things, the representatives of the Albanian and Bos­niak people in the Parliament of Montenegro demanded that the Dictionary of Montenegrin National and Literary Language be withdrawn due to the \"offensive\" and \"discriminatory\" definition of the terms Albanian and Bosniak. This has shown, once again, that Balkan ethnonyms and (or) demo­nyms have considerable weight in the descriptions of lexical material and that they can lead to the situation where politics defeats lexicography. That is why we will deal, primarily from a linguistic perspective, with the lexicographic definitions of ethnonyms and demonyms that are controversial in Montenegro. Starting from their foundation on ethnic or civic identity, we want to examine the possibilities and justification of the definition of these concepts bearing in mind the broader socio-political framework. Keywords: ethnonym, demonym, people, inhabitant, Balkans, dictionary, lexicographic definition, redefinition, ethnic identity, civic identity","PeriodicalId":43907,"journal":{"name":"Lexikos","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lexikos","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5788/33-1-1797","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lexicography is yet another witness of the historic recurrence in the Balkans — fifty years after banning Miloš Moskovljević's Dictionary of Contemporary Serbo-Croatian Literary Language with Language Manual (1966), the distribution of the first volume of the Dictionary of Montenegrin National and Literary Language (2016) of the Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts was stopped due to political reasons. Among other things, the representatives of the Albanian and Bos­niak people in the Parliament of Montenegro demanded that the Dictionary of Montenegrin National and Literary Language be withdrawn due to the "offensive" and "discriminatory" definition of the terms Albanian and Bosniak. This has shown, once again, that Balkan ethnonyms and (or) demo­nyms have considerable weight in the descriptions of lexical material and that they can lead to the situation where politics defeats lexicography. That is why we will deal, primarily from a linguistic perspective, with the lexicographic definitions of ethnonyms and demonyms that are controversial in Montenegro. Starting from their foundation on ethnic or civic identity, we want to examine the possibilities and justification of the definition of these concepts bearing in mind the broader socio-political framework. Keywords: ethnonym, demonym, people, inhabitant, Balkans, dictionary, lexicographic definition, redefinition, ethnic identity, civic identity
词汇学中的巴尔干民族名称和巴尔干国家居民名称(以《黑山民族文学语言词典》为例)
词典编纂是巴尔干半岛历史重演的另一个见证——在米洛什·莫斯科夫耶维奇的《当代塞尔维亚-克罗地亚文学语言词典》和《语言手册》(1966年)被禁50年后,黑山科学与艺术学院的《黑山民族和文学语言词典》(2016年)第一卷的分发由于政治原因被停止。除其他外,阿尔巴尼亚人和波斯尼亚-尼亚克人在黑山议会的代表要求撤回《黑山民族和文学语言词典》,因为阿尔巴尼亚人和波斯尼亚人这两个词的定义具有“冒犯性”和“歧视性”。这再次表明,巴尔干民族词和(或)民主词在词汇材料的描述中有相当大的分量,它们可能导致政治击败词典编纂的情况。这就是为什么我们将主要从语言学的角度来处理在黑山有争议的民族词和魔鬼词的词典定义。我们要从这些概念以种族或公民身份为基础出发,考虑到更广泛的社会政治框架,审查这些概念的定义的可能性和理由。关键词:民族词、恶魔词、人、居民、巴尔干半岛、词典、词典定义、重新定义、民族认同、公民认同
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lexikos
Lexikos Multiple-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Lexikos (Greek for "of or for words") is a journal for the lexicographical specialist. It is the only journal in Africa which is exclusively devoted to lexicography. Articles dealing with all aspects of lexicography and terminology or the implications that research in related disciplines such as linguistics, computer and information science, etc. has for lexicography will be considered for publication. Articles may be written in Afrikaans, English, Dutch, German and French.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信