Advantage of endoscopic-ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration associated to Sendai clinical guidelines in detecting the malignant risk in patients with undetermined pancreatic cysts: Long-term follow-up

IF 0.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
P. Gambitta, P. Aseni, P. Fontana, E. Bareggi, E. Forti, A. Tringali, F. Molteni, M. Vertemati
{"title":"Advantage of endoscopic-ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration associated to Sendai clinical guidelines in detecting the malignant risk in patients with undetermined pancreatic cysts: Long-term follow-up","authors":"P. Gambitta, P. Aseni, P. Fontana, E. Bareggi, E. Forti, A. Tringali, F. Molteni, M. Vertemati","doi":"10.5348/IJHPD-2016-62-OA-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Aims: Contradictory information exists on whether different clinical guidelines are effective in detecting the malignant risk in patients with pancreatic cysts. We have retrospectively evaluated the accuracy and the long-term outcome in patients with pancreatic cysts with a diameter ≥ 2 cm when indication for surgery was established by clinical evaluation of their malignant risk according to Sendai Clinical Guidelines associated to endoscopic-ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration.\n Material and Methods: Patients with pancreatic cysts with a diameter ≥2 cm were evaluated for their potential malignant risk by endoscopic-ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration associated to the clinical evaluation by Sendai Clinical Guidelines. Long-term outcome and comparison in patients survival as well as the accuracy in detecting malignancies were evaluated with the combined clinical and endoscopic evaluation.\n Results: Two hundred eighteen patients with pancreatic cysts were observed during a nine-year period of the study and 74 of them (33.9%) presenting with a pancreatic cyst ≥2 cm were eligible for the study. Fourteen malignant neoplasms (18.9%) were detected. The accuracy in detecting malignancy of combined clinical and endoscopic evaluation was very high (0.99). The five-year survival rates for patients who underwent surgery with benign and malignant pancreatic cysts and for patients in observational follow-up were similar (70% and 85%). The cohort of patients with malignant pancreatic cysts with ductal adenocarcinoma showed a five-year survival rate of 41%.\n Conclusion: Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration associated to Sendai clinical guidelines showed a high accuracy in detecting malignant risk in patients with pancreatic cysts with a diameter ≥ 2 cm. allowing appropriate selection for surgical treatment with satisfactory long-term survival.\n","PeriodicalId":40532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/IJHPD-2016-62-OA-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Contradictory information exists on whether different clinical guidelines are effective in detecting the malignant risk in patients with pancreatic cysts. We have retrospectively evaluated the accuracy and the long-term outcome in patients with pancreatic cysts with a diameter ≥ 2 cm when indication for surgery was established by clinical evaluation of their malignant risk according to Sendai Clinical Guidelines associated to endoscopic-ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration. Material and Methods: Patients with pancreatic cysts with a diameter ≥2 cm were evaluated for their potential malignant risk by endoscopic-ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration associated to the clinical evaluation by Sendai Clinical Guidelines. Long-term outcome and comparison in patients survival as well as the accuracy in detecting malignancies were evaluated with the combined clinical and endoscopic evaluation. Results: Two hundred eighteen patients with pancreatic cysts were observed during a nine-year period of the study and 74 of them (33.9%) presenting with a pancreatic cyst ≥2 cm were eligible for the study. Fourteen malignant neoplasms (18.9%) were detected. The accuracy in detecting malignancy of combined clinical and endoscopic evaluation was very high (0.99). The five-year survival rates for patients who underwent surgery with benign and malignant pancreatic cysts and for patients in observational follow-up were similar (70% and 85%). The cohort of patients with malignant pancreatic cysts with ductal adenocarcinoma showed a five-year survival rate of 41%. Conclusion: Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration associated to Sendai clinical guidelines showed a high accuracy in detecting malignant risk in patients with pancreatic cysts with a diameter ≥ 2 cm. allowing appropriate selection for surgical treatment with satisfactory long-term survival.
基于仙台临床指南的内镜-超声-细针穿刺检测未确定胰腺囊肿患者恶性风险的优势:长期随访
目的:不同的临床指南在检测胰腺囊肿患者的恶性风险方面是否有效存在矛盾的信息。我们回顾性评估了直径≥2cm胰腺囊肿患者的准确性和长期预后,根据仙台临床指南对其恶性风险进行临床评估,确定手术指征。内镜-超声-细针穿刺。材料与方法:采用内镜-超声-细针穿刺法评估胰腺囊肿直径≥2 cm患者的潜在恶性风险,并参照仙台临床指南进行临床评价。采用临床和内镜联合评估的方法,对两组患者的长期预后和生存率进行比较,并对恶性肿瘤的检测准确性进行评估。结果:在9年的研究期间,观察到218例胰腺囊肿患者,其中74例(33.9%)表现为胰腺囊肿≥2 cm,符合研究条件。恶性肿瘤14例(18.9%)。临床与内镜联合评估对恶性肿瘤的检出率非常高(0.99)。良性和恶性胰腺囊肿手术患者和观察随访患者的5年生存率相似(70%和85%)。恶性胰腺囊肿合并导管腺癌患者的5年生存率为41%。结论:结合仙台临床指南,内镜下超声细针穿刺对直径≥2 cm胰腺囊肿患者的恶性风险检测准确率较高。允许适当的选择手术治疗和满意的长期生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信