Residual Densities Affect Growth of Overstory Trees and Planted Douglas-Fir, Western Hemlock, and Western Redcedar: Results from the First Decade

L. C. Brodie, D. Debell
{"title":"Residual Densities Affect Growth of Overstory Trees and Planted Douglas-Fir, Western Hemlock, and Western Redcedar: Results from the First Decade","authors":"L. C. Brodie, D. Debell","doi":"10.5849/WJAF.12-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"•In recent years, interest has increased in silvicultural systems and harvest cuts that retain partial overstories, but there are few data available on the growth of the understory trees in such stands. We studied the response of overstory trees and underplanted seedlings, Douglas-fir (Pseudofsugo menziesii), western hemlock (Tsuga heferaphylla), and western redcedar (Thuja plicafa), to a range of residual overstory densities. Forty to 70-year-old Douglas-fir stands in western Washington were harvested, leaving retention levels of 0, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40% of full stocking. The 9-year response of the understory seedlings was species-dependent wnh Douglas-fir the largest in diameter (mean diameter 6.4 cm and mean height 3.8 m), western hemlock the tallest (mean diameter 5.5 cm and mean height 5.4 m), and redcedar the smallest (mean diameter 1.5 cm and mean height 1.5 m), in port because it was heavily browsed. Douglas-fir and western redcedar showed the greatest growth in the lowest retention levels (0 and 8%), and western hemlock responded best at the middle retention levels (8 and 16%).","PeriodicalId":51220,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"28 1","pages":"121-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5849/WJAF.12-019","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5849/WJAF.12-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

•In recent years, interest has increased in silvicultural systems and harvest cuts that retain partial overstories, but there are few data available on the growth of the understory trees in such stands. We studied the response of overstory trees and underplanted seedlings, Douglas-fir (Pseudofsugo menziesii), western hemlock (Tsuga heferaphylla), and western redcedar (Thuja plicafa), to a range of residual overstory densities. Forty to 70-year-old Douglas-fir stands in western Washington were harvested, leaving retention levels of 0, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40% of full stocking. The 9-year response of the understory seedlings was species-dependent wnh Douglas-fir the largest in diameter (mean diameter 6.4 cm and mean height 3.8 m), western hemlock the tallest (mean diameter 5.5 cm and mean height 5.4 m), and redcedar the smallest (mean diameter 1.5 cm and mean height 1.5 m), in port because it was heavily browsed. Douglas-fir and western redcedar showed the greatest growth in the lowest retention levels (0 and 8%), and western hemlock responded best at the middle retention levels (8 and 16%).
残留密度影响上层树木和人工道格拉斯冷杉、西部铁杉和西部红杉的生长:第一个十年的结果
•近年来,人们对保留部分林下植被的造林系统和采伐越来越感兴趣,但关于这类林分中林下植被生长的数据很少。我们研究了林下树木和林下幼苗Douglas-fir (Pseudofsugo menziesii)、西部铁杉(Tsuga heferaphylla)和西部红杉(Thuja plicafa)对一系列剩余林下密度的响应。华盛顿西部40至70年树龄的道格拉斯冷杉林被采伐后,保留率分别为0、8、16、24、32和40%。林下植物幼苗的9年响应具有种间依赖性,其中杉木幼苗直径最大(平均直径6.4 cm,平均高3.8 m),铁杉幼苗最高(平均直径5.5 cm,平均高5.4 m),红杉幼苗最小(平均直径1.5 cm,平均高1.5 m)。道格拉斯冷杉和西部红杉在最低保留率(0和8%)下生长最快,西部铁杉在中等保留率(8%和16%)下反应最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信